In tier 3 from midnight tonight?
Watch out for a screetching u turn on Christmas covid arrangements in the next 48 hours
In tier 3 from midnight tonight?
Yeah, I reckon so. At minimum they're going to try and ban households from different tiers mixing, could easily be no travel more than 30 miles. Don't think they'll completely ban Christmas bubbles though as I just don't see many people actually following that guidance and enforcement would be next to impossibleSaintK wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 3:07 pmIn tier 3 from midnight tonight?
Watch out for a screetching u turn on Christmas covid arrangements in the next 48 hours
Why with the levels ramping up so in schools they didn't end on-site term 10-14 days earlier and go back to online allowing the virus to work through households ahead of Christmas mixing I don't know. This is like when they refused to lockdown in sync with half-term, they're actively choosing to have a bigger problem for no sensible reasonSaint wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 3:12 pmYeah, I reckon so. At minimum they're going to try and ban households from different tiers mixing, could easily be no travel more than 30 miles. Don't think they'll completely ban Christmas bubbles though as I just don't see many people actually following that guidance and enforcement would be next to impossibleSaintK wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 3:07 pmIn tier 3 from midnight tonight?
Watch out for a screetching u turn on Christmas covid arrangements in the next 48 hours
I know. Makes precisely no sense at allRhubarb & Custard wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 3:46 pmWhy with the levels ramping up so in schools they didn't end on-site term 10-14 days earlier and go back to online allowing the virus to work through households ahead of Christmas mixing I don't know. This is like when they refused to lockdown in sync with half-term, they're actively choosing to have a bigger problem for no sensible reasonSaint wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 3:12 pmYeah, I reckon so. At minimum they're going to try and ban households from different tiers mixing, could easily be no travel more than 30 miles. Don't think they'll completely ban Christmas bubbles though as I just don't see many people actually following that guidance and enforcement would be next to impossibleSaintK wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 3:07 pm
In tier 3 from midnight tonight?
Watch out for a screetching u turn on Christmas covid arrangements in the next 48 hours
Williamson threatened Greenwich Council with immediate legal action yesterday if they did thatSaint wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 3:54 pmI know. Makes precisely no sense at allRhubarb & Custard wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 3:46 pmWhy with the levels ramping up so in schools they didn't end on-site term 10-14 days earlier and go back to online allowing the virus to work through households ahead of Christmas mixing I don't know. This is like when they refused to lockdown in sync with half-term, they're actively choosing to have a bigger problem for no sensible reasonSaint wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 3:12 pm
Yeah, I reckon so. At minimum they're going to try and ban households from different tiers mixing, could easily be no travel more than 30 miles. Don't think they'll completely ban Christmas bubbles though as I just don't see many people actually following that guidance and enforcement would be next to impossible
Which would have something to it as a strategy if they weren't going to lockdown after the festivities (or even cancel the relaxation of the rules). As is it just looks a horrible muddle of decision making and communication, exactly what they were told to avoid in management of a massive public safety issue.SaintK wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 4:27 pmWilliamson threatened Greenwich Council with immediate legal action yesterday if they did thatSaint wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 3:54 pmI know. Makes precisely no sense at allRhubarb & Custard wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 3:46 pm
Why with the levels ramping up so in schools they didn't end on-site term 10-14 days earlier and go back to online allowing the virus to work through households ahead of Christmas mixing I don't know. This is like when they refused to lockdown in sync with half-term, they're actively choosing to have a bigger problem for no sensible reason
Yeah, it's difficult to understand why people are still surprised by this.Sandstorm wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 4:21 pm You guys are looking at this expecting the Govt to have a handle on this and know WTF they are doing.![]()
they need to find a set of balls; & do their duty to their electorate & take decisions to protect the thick feckers from themselves; because it is increasingly apparent, that trusting people to do the right thing hasn't worked; & now, more draconian measures are required, because the Politicians chose popularity over doing what was required.Queues of ambulances have formed outside several hospitals in Northern Ireland as pressure continues to mount on the over-capacity health service.
The scenes unfolded as First Minister Arlene Foster participated in a call with other UK political leaders to review the planned relaxation of restrictions on household gatherings over Christmas.
No decisions were taken, with Stormont ministers set to convene to discuss the situation on Thursday amid intensifying calls from medics to rethink the relaxations and introduce fresh measures to curb the spread of the coronavirus.
..
I think that's a but unfair. They had their manufacturing/dosage error early on, made the regulator aware, got approval for the study to continue..... but it threw up a massively unexpected result. That in turn means the data is far more complex to analyse and sign off. Remember, it's the regulator that makes the dosage recommendation when there is multiple datasets, not the manufacturerThe Druid wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 9:45 pm It seems that the Oxford-AstraZeneca effort has become the British Leyland of vaccines.
It still has the advantage of being logistically, the easiest to distribute; & with cost & the humanitarian ethos of it's development, will probably mean that it is the vaccine that will be delivered to the most people on the planetSaint wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:12 pmI think that's a but unfair. They had their manufacturing/dosage error early on, made the regulator aware, got approval for the study to continue..... but it threw up a massively unexpected result. That in turn means the data is far more complex to analyse and sign off. Remember, it's the regulator that makes the dosage recommendation when there is multiple datasets, not the manufacturerThe Druid wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 9:45 pm It seems that the Oxford-AstraZeneca effort has become the British Leyland of vaccines.
Bimbowomxn wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 9:49 pm
Have you stopped gleefully reporting them?
We also in England haven’t had a rise in cases (positive tests) for 6 days now,
Yup. I rather drive 20 miles to work in an Allegro than have to walk it.fishfoodie wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:17 pmIt still has the advantage of being logistically, the easiest to distribute; & with cost & the humanitarian ethos of it's development, will probably mean that it is the vaccine that will be delivered to the most people on the planetSaint wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:12 pmI think that's a but unfair. They had their manufacturing/dosage error early on, made the regulator aware, got approval for the study to continue..... but it threw up a massively unexpected result. That in turn means the data is far more complex to analyse and sign off. Remember, it's the regulator that makes the dosage recommendation when there is multiple datasets, not the manufacturerThe Druid wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 9:45 pm It seems that the Oxford-AstraZeneca effort has become the British Leyland of vaccines.
and now at least you can justify wearing a mask while you are in that Allegro, or wedge of cheese !Sandstorm wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:19 pmYup. I rather drive 20 miles to work in an Allegro than have to walk it.fishfoodie wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:17 pmIt still has the advantage of being logistically, the easiest to distribute; & with cost & the humanitarian ethos of it's development, will probably mean that it is the vaccine that will be delivered to the most people on the planetSaint wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:12 pm
I think that's a but unfair. They had their manufacturing/dosage error early on, made the regulator aware, got approval for the study to continue..... but it threw up a massively unexpected result. That in turn means the data is far more complex to analyse and sign off. Remember, it's the regulator that makes the dosage recommendation when there is multiple datasets, not the manufacturer
I take your point, it was a rather flippant comment I suppose. It does seem that it will never be accepted by the US regulator though, which if true will be a huge setback after all the effort involved.Saint wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:12 pmI think that's a but unfair. They had their manufacturing/dosage error early on, made the regulator aware, got approval for the study to continue..... but it threw up a massively unexpected result. That in turn means the data is far more complex to analyse and sign off. Remember, it's the regulator that makes the dosage recommendation when there is multiple datasets, not the manufacturerThe Druid wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 9:45 pm It seems that the Oxford-AstraZeneca effort has become the British Leyland of vaccines.
In Covid matters, the US is always an excellent example of what NOT to do !The Druid wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:24 pmI take your point, it was a rather flippant comment I suppose. It does seem that it will never be accepted by the US regulator though, which if true will be a huge setback after all the effort involved.Saint wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:12 pmI think that's a but unfair. They had their manufacturing/dosage error early on, made the regulator aware, got approval for the study to continue..... but it threw up a massively unexpected result. That in turn means the data is far more complex to analyse and sign off. Remember, it's the regulator that makes the dosage recommendation when there is multiple datasets, not the manufacturerThe Druid wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 9:45 pm It seems that the Oxford-AstraZeneca effort has become the British Leyland of vaccines.
Would I have to walk it whilst suffering with a plague? 'cause just 20 miles seems easier and faster than an AllegroSandstorm wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:19 pm
Yup. I rather drive 20 miles to work in an Allegro than have to walk it.
Yeah, it's absolutely terrible that they've managed to get a vaccine developed to the point of approval in less than a year, how shit is that.The Druid wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 9:45 pm It seems that the Oxford-AstraZeneca effort has become the British Leyland of vaccines.
There's a separate US study, expected end of Jan. Most if the doomsayers appear to be US financial analysts whose impartiality is questionable - but ultimately the enormous benefit of the AZ vaccine is not in the US.The Druid wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:24 pmI take your point, it was a rather flippant comment I suppose. It does seem that it will never be accepted by the US regulator though, which if true will be a huge setback after all the effort involved.Saint wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:12 pmI think that's a but unfair. They had their manufacturing/dosage error early on, made the regulator aware, got approval for the study to continue..... but it threw up a massively unexpected result. That in turn means the data is far more complex to analyse and sign off. Remember, it's the regulator that makes the dosage recommendation when there is multiple datasets, not the manufacturerThe Druid wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 9:45 pm It seems that the Oxford-AstraZeneca effort has become the British Leyland of vaccines.
It's vintage of a particularly British attitude to our own stuff that is fairly cringeworthy. It must be crap because it's British, everyone else definitely doesn't have similar issues, rather than hope it works aim for snark from the start. Bin.Biffer wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 11:31 pmYeah, it's absolutely terrible that they've managed to get a vaccine developed to the point of approval in less than a year, how shit is that.The Druid wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 9:45 pm It seems that the Oxford-AstraZeneca effort has become the British Leyland of vaccines.
You fucking halfwit.
Saint wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 11:43 pmThere's a separate US study, expected end of Jan. Most if the doomsayers appear to be US financial analysts whose impartiality is questionable - but ultimately the enormous benefit of the AZ vaccine is not in the US.The Druid wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:24 pmI take your point, it was a rather flippant comment I suppose. It does seem that it will never be accepted by the US regulator though, which if true will be a huge setback after all the effort involved.Saint wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:12 pm
I think that's a but unfair. They had their manufacturing/dosage error early on, made the regulator aware, got approval for the study to continue..... but it threw up a massively unexpected result. That in turn means the data is far more complex to analyse and sign off. Remember, it's the regulator that makes the dosage recommendation when there is multiple datasets, not the manufacturer
No and No. Never gleefully, the guy reporting them via twitter has been slack lately and I've been otherwise occupied.
It's true, really infuriates me.Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:27 amIt's vintage of a particularly British attitude to our own stuff that is fairly cringeworthy. It must be crap because it's British, everyone else definitely doesn't have similar issues, rather than hope it works aim for snark from the start. Bin.Biffer wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 11:31 pmYeah, it's absolutely terrible that they've managed to get a vaccine developed to the point of approval in less than a year, how shit is that.The Druid wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 9:45 pm It seems that the Oxford-AstraZeneca effort has become the British Leyland of vaccines.
You fucking halfwit.
I wonder who they are talking to in these polls, I haven't spoken to a single advocate of lockdowns for months. FTR I am obeying them (before there is a pile on. )Slick wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 10:39 amIt's true, really infuriates me.Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:27 amIt's vintage of a particularly British attitude to our own stuff that is fairly cringeworthy. It must be crap because it's British, everyone else definitely doesn't have similar issues, rather than hope it works aim for snark from the start. Bin.Biffer wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 11:31 pm
Yeah, it's absolutely terrible that they've managed to get a vaccine developed to the point of approval in less than a year, how shit is that.
You fucking halfwit.
The current situation also seems to be quite British though. Opinion polls say the majority of people don't want a relaxation of rules over Christmas but unless we are actually told not to do it, the majority will go ahead anyway.
It's looking increasingly silly. I got it more when there was no end in sight, but the people who are likeliest to die from Christmas interaction would be vaccinated by March. There's light at the end of the tunnel, so not to ask for one last heave seems like a major blunder.Slick wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 10:39 amIt's true, really infuriates me.Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:27 amIt's vintage of a particularly British attitude to our own stuff that is fairly cringeworthy. It must be crap because it's British, everyone else definitely doesn't have similar issues, rather than hope it works aim for snark from the start. Bin.Biffer wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 11:31 pm
Yeah, it's absolutely terrible that they've managed to get a vaccine developed to the point of approval in less than a year, how shit is that.
You fucking halfwit.
The current situation also seems to be quite British though. Opinion polls say the majority of people don't want a relaxation of rules over Christmas but unless we are actually told not to do it, the majority will go ahead anyway.
people not at the golf club I imagineOpenside wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 11:18 amI wonder who they are talking to in these polls, I haven't spoken to a single advocate of lockdowns for months. FTR I am obeying them (before there is a pile on. )Slick wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 10:39 amIt's true, really infuriates me.Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:27 am
It's vintage of a particularly British attitude to our own stuff that is fairly cringeworthy. It must be crap because it's British, everyone else definitely doesn't have similar issues, rather than hope it works aim for snark from the start. Bin.
The current situation also seems to be quite British though. Opinion polls say the majority of people don't want a relaxation of rules over Christmas but unless we are actually told not to do it, the majority will go ahead anyway.
As the resident "Grandad on Facebook" I can see why you'd be miffed at not being part of the poll.Openside wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 11:18 amI wonder who they are talking to in these polls, I haven't spoken to a single advocate of lockdowns for months. FTR I am obeying them (before there is a pile on. )Slick wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 10:39 amIt's true, really infuriates me.Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:27 am
It's vintage of a particularly British attitude to our own stuff that is fairly cringeworthy. It must be crap because it's British, everyone else definitely doesn't have similar issues, rather than hope it works aim for snark from the start. Bin.
The current situation also seems to be quite British though. Opinion polls say the majority of people don't want a relaxation of rules over Christmas but unless we are actually told not to do it, the majority will go ahead anyway.
Slick wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 11:25 ampeople not at the golf club I imagineOpenside wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 11:18 amI wonder who they are talking to in these polls, I haven't spoken to a single advocate of lockdowns for months. FTR I am obeying them (before there is a pile on. )Slick wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 10:39 am
It's true, really infuriates me.
The current situation also seems to be quite British though. Opinion polls say the majority of people don't want a relaxation of rules over Christmas but unless we are actually told not to do it, the majority will go ahead anyway.
Don't bother.Rinkals wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 11:43 amAs the resident "Grandad on Facebook" I can see why you'd be miffed at not being part of the poll.Openside wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 11:18 amI wonder who they are talking to in these polls, I haven't spoken to a single advocate of lockdowns for months. FTR I am obeying them (before there is a pile on. )Slick wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 10:39 am
It's true, really infuriates me.
The current situation also seems to be quite British though. Opinion polls say the majority of people don't want a relaxation of rules over Christmas but unless we are actually told not to do it, the majority will go ahead anyway.
Speaking of that, I'm getting miffed at all this "Don't give Granny Covid" headlines. What about us old codgers eh?Rinkals wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 11:43 amAs the resident "Grandad on Facebook" I can see why you'd be miffed at not being part of the poll.Openside wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 11:18 amI wonder who they are talking to in these polls, I haven't spoken to a single advocate of lockdowns for months. FTR I am obeying them (before there is a pile on. )Slick wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 10:39 am
It's true, really infuriates me.
The current situation also seems to be quite British though. Opinion polls say the majority of people don't want a relaxation of rules over Christmas but unless we are actually told not to do it, the majority will go ahead anyway.
I assume backed by the Welsh pop at large?? if polls are to be believed.
So this was a mistake sent out to hundreds of people using the Scottish app.... 2 days taken off work for nothingSlick wrote: Mon Dec 14, 2020 2:27 pm Cases going up quite quickly in Edinburgh as well it seems.
As an aside, my wife got pinged by the Scottish trace app this morning about someone she was near last Sunday so told to isolate for 2 days. Seems a little late.
The WG are probably more hated in Wales than they've ever been before.Openside wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 1:26 pmI assume backed by the Welsh pop at large?? if polls are to be believed.