French Ball Grabber Goes Unpunished.

Where goats go to escape
Post Reply
sockwithaticket
Posts: 9348
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

Or he may as well have done.

2 weeks for full on grabbing Leonardo Sarto's testicles with a good degree more force and mal-intent than earnt Joe Marler 10 weeks.

Sarto got a week for a retaliatory punch.

Baffling.

For those who haven't seen it:



Footage of the incident begins at 1:35 if I've messed up posting the video at the right time.
User avatar
sturginho
Posts: 2594
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:51 pm

Ridiculous 🙄
User avatar
laurent
Posts: 2297
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:36 am

Wow the French rugby sites here were expecting way over this (years...)

Very lucky ... and surprising
User avatar
sturginho
Posts: 2594
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:51 pm

Also exactly how was the ref expecting Sarto to react to being grabbed by the balls?
sockwithaticket
Posts: 9348
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

sturginho wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 9:47 pm Also exactly how was the ref expecting Sarto to react to being grabbed by the balls?
Tbf, it's long been established that retaliation gets sanctioned too regardless of how reasonable it may seem.

That said I am astonished they elected to ban him, even for just the one week, rather than say that the red card was sufficient punishment.
User avatar
Enzedder
Posts: 4123
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:55 pm
Location: Hamilton NZ

They gave the poor bugger a week off to recover. Very thoughtful of them. Grabber should get a tad more for the twist.
I drink and I forget things.
stemoc
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 7:10 am

thats nuts
but its french rugby, they play dirty all the time, so dirty that they will intentionally infect their Opposition with covid to get a free ride..
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12046
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

I repeat my stance of 20 years of posting: ball grabbers and eye gougers should be life ban.
stemoc
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 7:10 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Dec 17, 2020 8:42 am I repeat my stance of 20 years of posting: ball grabbers and eye gougers should be life ban.
butt fingerers?
User avatar
MungoMan
Posts: 487
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:53 pm
Location: Coalfalls

stemoc wrote: Thu Dec 17, 2020 9:06 am
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Dec 17, 2020 8:42 am I repeat my stance of 20 years of posting: ball grabbers and eye gougers should be life ban.
butt fingerers?
...should be firmly directed to find another hobby.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 11896
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

MungoMan wrote: Thu Dec 17, 2020 10:13 am
stemoc wrote: Thu Dec 17, 2020 9:06 am
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Dec 17, 2020 8:42 am I repeat my stance of 20 years of posting: ball grabbers and eye gougers should be life ban.
butt fingerers?
...should be firmly directed to find another hobby.
League
Slick
Posts: 13568
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

sockwithaticket wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 10:02 pm
sturginho wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 9:47 pm Also exactly how was the ref expecting Sarto to react to being grabbed by the balls?
Tbf, it's long been established that retaliation gets sanctioned too regardless of how reasonable it may seem.

That said I am astonished they elected to ban him, even for just the one week, rather than say that the red card was sufficient punishment.
Perhaps a warning for the crapness of the punch?
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
Hong Kong
Posts: 417
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 1:04 am

sockwithaticket wrote: Wed Dec 16, 2020 9:19 pm Or he may as well have done.

2 weeks for full on grabbing Leonardo Sarto's testicles with a good degree more force and mal-intent than earnt Joe Marler 10 weeks.

Sarto got a week for a retaliatory punch.

Baffling.

For those who haven't seen it:



Footage of the incident begins at 1:35 if I've messed up posting the video at the right time.
The original ball grabber was a grub act and deserves way more than 2 weeks, which as has been pointed out, is a far worse act than JM’s who got a significantly longer ban for a ‘fondle’ (it deserved sanction and a ban but 10 weeks? 🤦🏻‍♂️). Now as for the victim, he retaliated, which is contrary to the laws and deserved sanction. Maybe a “red card was sufficient penalty” decision would have been correct but very few would have disagreed with a YC had been issued instead
Post Reply