So, coronavirus...

Where goats go to escape
dpedin
Posts: 3341
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

Sandstorm wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 4:15 pm Something which I haven't seen analysed is exactly how each country is treating patients that arrive in their Covid19 wards.

Who sends their patients to hospital earliest? Denmark or Norway? Does the UK wait too long before admitting people for treatment?
Do they all get the same treatment when they arrive - Dex and high-flow oxygen? Do you wait longer for oxygen in NI vs Scotland?
What about care in the ward? Do patients in Australia get turned/proned more often than UK?

I think the above factors are just as important as obesity or co-morbidity factors when considering deaths.
Medical procedures, use of ventilation/CPAP and drugs they are using is evolving all the time and in the UK at least the college/professional networks etc are making sure best practice etc is communicated quickly. Four country CMOs are coordinating communications as well. Not sure about other countries, however in some of the states in the USA it depends if you have a valid credit card or health insurance.

However best way of minimising death is to not catch it!
dpedin
Posts: 3341
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

Fangle wrote: Thu Mar 04, 2021 7:23 pm Out of curiosity, who was dpedin on PR? These new names confuse me.
dpedin!
dkm57
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:08 pm

dpedin wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 4:32 pm
Fangle wrote: Thu Mar 04, 2021 7:23 pm Out of curiosity, who was dpedin on PR? These new names confuse me.
dpedin!
sneaky :???:
User avatar
Openside
Posts: 1718
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:27 pm

Raggs wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:02 am
Openside wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 12:14 am
Raggs wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 9:16 am Id say we handled it badly. The tier systems just meant lower tiers were free to get to higher. The lack of enforcement on movement between tiers meant tier 1 areas had a load of incoming traffic.

Christmas was a disaster, 1 day back at school the same.
Do you think the one day back at school thing rather than the total clusterfuck it appeared to be, was them delineating the end of the holidays, so kids felt they were 'back at school' and the 'on holiday' mentality was behind them. Just a thought.
No. Not even close. Not even in the realms of possibility.
Well it seems utterly bonkers then 🤪 I thought it sent the message to the pupils and teachers that school had started.
User avatar
Openside
Posts: 1718
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:27 pm

Sandstorm wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 4:15 pm Something which I haven't seen analysed is exactly how each country is treating patients that arrive in their Covid19 wards.

Who sends their patients to hospital earliest? Denmark or Norway? Does the UK wait too long before admitting people for treatment?
Do they all get the same treatment when they arrive - Dex and high-flow oxygen? Do you wait longer for oxygen in NI vs Scotland?
What about care in the ward? Do patients in Australia get turned/proned more often than UK?

I think the above factors are just as important as obesity or co-morbidity factors when considering deaths.
I read an article that suggested that per capita the French Italians and Spanish had up to three times more people in hospital than the Brits, which I thought was interesting. Perhaps there is a bit of stiff upper lip about the Brits still 😂
User avatar
Raggs
Posts: 3837
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:51 pm

Openside wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 5:33 pmWell it seems utterly bonkers then 🤪 I thought it sent the message to the pupils and teachers that school had started.
It was literally a u-turn. They were adamant that schools would re-open. Scientists advising against it. I suspect that basically too many people refused to send their children, and it became obvious that it was a bad choice. I refused to send my son.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
User avatar
Fangle
Posts: 567
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:25 pm

Raggs wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 5:42 pm
Openside wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 5:33 pmWell it seems utterly bonkers then 🤪 I thought it sent the message to the pupils and teachers that school had started.
It was literally a u-turn. They were adamant that schools would re-open. Scientists advising against it. I suspect that basically too many people refused to send their children, and it became obvious that it was a bad choice. I refused to send my son.
How different from the USA, where the CDC is pushing for kids to go back to school. The catholic and other private schools have been open for some time with no disastrous results.
Ovals
Posts: 1573
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:52 pm

Fangle wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 6:06 pm
Raggs wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 5:42 pm
Openside wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 5:33 pmWell it seems utterly bonkers then 🤪 I thought it sent the message to the pupils and teachers that school had started.
It was literally a u-turn. They were adamant that schools would re-open. Scientists advising against it. I suspect that basically too many people refused to send their children, and it became obvious that it was a bad choice. I refused to send my son.
How different from the USA, where the CDC is pushing for kids to go back to school. The catholic and other private schools have been open for some time with no disastrous results.
Not sure that the USA is a great advert for how to handle Covid. Some might even claim it's been a disaster there.
User avatar
Fangle
Posts: 567
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:25 pm

Ovals,

In no way am I defending the States handling of the virus. All I am doing is saying that many of the private schools, not the government controlled schools, have been back in class for months without disaster.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8766
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Fangle wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 8:04 pm Ovals,

In no way am I defending the States handling of the virus. All I am doing is saying that many of the private schools, not the government controlled schools, have been back in class for months without disaster.
There are those who would say that 500,000 official deaths; & deity only knows how man, "extra" deaths; as well as the fact that the US death rate, & case rate still hasn't plateaued; as somewhat of a disaster.

It's very difficult to pick out the wood from the trees in the where the US deaths & cases are coming from.
User avatar
Fangle
Posts: 567
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:25 pm

fishfoodie wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 8:25 pm
Fangle wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 8:04 pm Ovals,

In no way am I defending the States handling of the virus. All I am doing is saying that many of the private schools, not the government controlled schools, have been back in class for months without disaster.
There are those who would say that 500,000 official deaths; & deity only knows how man, "extra" deaths; as well as the fact that the US death rate, & case rate still hasn't plateaued; as somewhat of a disaster.

It's very difficult to pick out the wood from the trees in the where the US deaths & cases are coming from.
I see that the worldometer site has the UK death rate at even worse than USA (if you can believe their figures) but I’m not trying to make points. All I’m saying is that going back to school looks to be ok. Make of that what you will.
tc27
Posts: 2559
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

The US has generally had less deaths per head than most European countries, many states have had far less stringent lock-downs and their economy has suffered far less and is now bouncing back strongly (plus they are all getting a cash boost from the US government). Ohh and they are vaccinating quicker than anyone except for the UK.

At some point we are going to have to ask why Europe suffered the worst out of all the all the worlds developed areas despite the far greater social welfare systems and socialized health care than most. It may not be comfortable for us.
User avatar
JPNZ
Posts: 215
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 12:44 am
Location: Christchurch NZ

I only realised this morning after PM Jacinda spoke on the news, that once all NZ population is vaccinated with both shots that to keep that immunity up every following 12 months everyone needs to get another shot(s). This will potentially be in place for the next 6-7 years.

I seriously thought it was two shots of vaccine and you were done. :oops:
Last edited by JPNZ on Mon Mar 08, 2021 9:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 10497
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

tc27 wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 9:26 pm The US has generally had less deaths per head than most European countries, many states have had far less stringent lock-downs and their economy has suffered far less and is now bouncing back strongly (plus they are all getting a cash boost from the US government). Ohh and they are vaccinating quicker than anyone except for the UK.

At some point we are going to have to ask why Europe suffered the worst out of all the all the worlds developed areas despite the far greater social welfare systems and socialized health care than most. It may not be comfortable for us.

I don't know if this will be shown to be a factor, but the US has a population density of 36 people per sqr km, compared to the EU's 112. The median age in the US is 38.3 years, in the EU it's 43.7.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 10497
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

Gruesome chart alert, deaths per million population, but with the caveat that different methodologies are used across the world. I don't think we'll get a proper handle on this for a long time

https://www.statista.com/statistics/110 ... habitants/
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 10497
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

JPNZ wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 9:34 pm I only realised this morning after PM Jacinda spoke on the news, that once all NZ population is vaccinated with both shots that to keep that immunity up every following 12 months everyone needs to get another shot(s). This will potentially be in place for the next 6-7 years.

I seriously thought it was two shots of vaccine and you were done. :oops:

It's a small price to pay, though, isn't it, all things considered?

NZ has done really well, your PM sets a high bar.
shaggy
Posts: 454
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:11 am

Tichtheid wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 9:35 pm
tc27 wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 9:26 pm The US has generally had less deaths per head than most European countries, many states have had far less stringent lock-downs and their economy has suffered far less and is now bouncing back strongly (plus they are all getting a cash boost from the US government). Ohh and they are vaccinating quicker than anyone except for the UK.

At some point we are going to have to ask why Europe suffered the worst out of all the all the worlds developed areas despite the far greater social welfare systems and socialized health care than most. It may not be comfortable for us.

I don't know if this will be shown to be a factor, but the US has a population density of 36 people per sqr km, compared to the EU's 112. The median age in the US is 38.3 years, in the EU it's 43.7.
We have been reliably informed that public health policy is the single most important factor in national death rates.
Ovals
Posts: 1573
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:52 pm

Fangle wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 9:01 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 8:25 pm
Fangle wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 8:04 pm Ovals,

In no way am I defending the States handling of the virus. All I am doing is saying that many of the private schools, not the government controlled schools, have been back in class for months without disaster.
There are those who would say that 500,000 official deaths; & deity only knows how man, "extra" deaths; as well as the fact that the US death rate, & case rate still hasn't plateaued; as somewhat of a disaster.

It's very difficult to pick out the wood from the trees in the where the US deaths & cases are coming from.
I see that the worldometer site has the UK death rate at even worse than USA (if you can believe their figures) but I’m not trying to make points. All I’m saying is that going back to school looks to be ok. Make of that what you will.
In the UK's case we have the perfect Covid storm. High average age, high population density, open borders, lots of travelling, overweight population, a more highly transmissibe dominant Covid strain and a Government that was slow to act. Given the death rates in the USA, I really wouldn't be looking at the States for an example of how to handle Covid, including the return of kids to schools.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5507
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Image
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Biffer
Posts: 10069
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

shaggy wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:00 pm
Tichtheid wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 9:35 pm
tc27 wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 9:26 pm The US has generally had less deaths per head than most European countries, many states have had far less stringent lock-downs and their economy has suffered far less and is now bouncing back strongly (plus they are all getting a cash boost from the US government). Ohh and they are vaccinating quicker than anyone except for the UK.

At some point we are going to have to ask why Europe suffered the worst out of all the all the worlds developed areas despite the far greater social welfare systems and socialized health care than most. It may not be comfortable for us.

I don't know if this will be shown to be a factor, but the US has a population density of 36 people per sqr km, compared to the EU's 112. The median age in the US is 38.3 years, in the EU it's 43.7.
We have been reliably informed that public health policy is the single most important factor in national death rates.
That’s not generally what people have been saying. They’ve been pointing out that you can’t just assign differences to obesity, demography or population density. These things will all have an influence, but the PH policy that’s put in place alongside them is also very important. Generally it’s been in response to someone claiming it’s all down to one or two factors.

For what it’s worth I think cultural differences, age demographics and public health policy will probably be the big things that have an effect on rates.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
Openside
Posts: 1718
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:27 pm

Insane_Homer wrote: Tue Mar 09, 2021 9:59 am Image
:clap: :clap: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5507
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

https://www.ft.com/content/9948d23a-70f ... 7c9f8eb956
England’s £23bn test and trace programme condemned by MPs

England’s test and trace programme failed to make a “measurable difference” to the spread of the pandemic despite an outlay of £23bn, an “unimaginable” level of expenditure, a parliamentary spending watchdog has claimed.
Another world beater :thumbdown:
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
tc27
Posts: 2559
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

We have been reliably informed that public health policy is the single most important factor in national death rates.
I have said my piece on this - a really bizarre claim.
User avatar
Lobby
Posts: 1875
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2020 7:34 pm

tc27 wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:12 am
We have been reliably informed that public health policy is the single most important factor in national death rates.
I have said my piece on this - a really bizarre claim.
Dpedin won't be satisfied until we have all signed affidavits confirming that we agree that Boris ("the Bumblecunt") is personally and solely responsible for every single death in the UK.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7333
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

Lobby wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:17 am
tc27 wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:12 am
We have been reliably informed that public health policy is the single most important factor in national death rates.
I have said my piece on this - a really bizarre claim.
Dpedin won't be satisfied until we have all signed affidavits confirming that we agree that Boris ("the Bumblecunt") is personally and solely responsible for every single death in the UK.
Nah, not all of them.
TheNatalShark
Posts: 1298
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm

Saint wrote: Thu Mar 04, 2021 5:36 pm
TheNatalShark wrote: Thu Mar 04, 2021 4:02 pm Italy confirms first European export ban of vaccines produced locally, 250k AZ which were destined for Aus.

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/hea ... -1.4501365

https://www.ft.com/content/bed655ac-928 ... 15284798c8
That's pretty much ended any long term pharma investment in Italy then
Now this is an interestingly ironic development, although obviously negotiations would have been more or less completed before the Aus export ban, and production will only seem to come online at a point where it will likely not be at any risk of forming part of Italy's current plans and potential confiscation.

https://www.thehindu.com/news/internati ... 0.ece/amp/

Getting more positive by the day that the developing world won't have to wait until late 2022 before seeing meaningful levels of jabs available.
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 8:30 am https://www.ft.com/content/9948d23a-70f ... 7c9f8eb956
England’s £23bn test and trace programme condemned by MPs

England’s test and trace programme failed to make a “measurable difference” to the spread of the pandemic despite an outlay of £23bn, an “unimaginable” level of expenditure, a parliamentary spending watchdog has claimed.
Another world beater :thumbdown:
I;'m trying to find figures on what has actually been spent, vs what was budgeted.

As of October last year £4 billion had actuall'y been spent out of the total budget, and a large % of that was the laboratory testing - which is also shared across the whole of the UK. There's been a massive ramp up in testing since then, so I could easily believe that that figure has doubled, but it would still be a long way short of £23 billion that was in last year's budget
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

TheNatalShark wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 10:24 am
Saint wrote: Thu Mar 04, 2021 5:36 pm
TheNatalShark wrote: Thu Mar 04, 2021 4:02 pm Italy confirms first European export ban of vaccines produced locally, 250k AZ which were destined for Aus.

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/hea ... -1.4501365

https://www.ft.com/content/bed655ac-928 ... 15284798c8
That's pretty much ended any long term pharma investment in Italy then
Now this is an interestingly ironic development, although obviously negotiations would have been more or less completed before the Aus export ban, and production will only seem to come online at a point where it will likely not be at any risk of forming part of Italy's current plans and potential confiscation.

https://www.thehindu.com/news/internati ... 0.ece/amp/

Getting more positive by the day that the developing world won't have to wait until late 2022 before seeing meaningful levels of jabs available.
It's certainly unexpected.

I also see that the EU is accusing the UK of implementing an export ban of all vaccine and vaccine components. Not sure what the angle is here, as if we were then one of the critical components of Pfizer wouldn't be reaching them
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7333
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

Saint wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 10:31 am
TheNatalShark wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 10:24 am
Saint wrote: Thu Mar 04, 2021 5:36 pm

That's pretty much ended any long term pharma investment in Italy then
Now this is an interestingly ironic development, although obviously negotiations would have been more or less completed before the Aus export ban, and production will only seem to come online at a point where it will likely not be at any risk of forming part of Italy's current plans and potential confiscation.

https://www.thehindu.com/news/internati ... 0.ece/amp/

Getting more positive by the day that the developing world won't have to wait until late 2022 before seeing meaningful levels of jabs available.
It's certainly unexpected.

I also see that the EU is accusing the UK of implementing an export ban of all vaccine and vaccine components. Not sure what the angle is here, as if we were then one of the critical components of Pfizer wouldn't be reaching them
Robust reaction from our lot!
A senior European Union diplomat was summoned to the Foreign Office this morning in the row over vaccine supply, PA Media reports.
As my colleague Jessica Elgot reports, Dominic Raab, the foreign secretary, ordered the meeting in response to claims by the president of the European council, Charles Michel, that the UK has banned exports of vaccines, which the government says are entirely false. Here story is here.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/20 ... -claims
Ovals
Posts: 1573
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:52 pm

Lobby wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:17 am
tc27 wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:12 am
We have been reliably informed that public health policy is the single most important factor in national death rates.
I have said my piece on this - a really bizarre claim.
Dpedin won't be satisfied until we have all signed affidavits confirming that we agree that Boris ("the Bumblecunt") is personally and solely responsible for every single death in the UK.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
TheNatalShark
Posts: 1298
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm

Saint wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 10:31 am It's certainly unexpected.

I also see that the EU is accusing the UK of implementing an export ban of all vaccine and vaccine components. Not sure what the angle is here, as if we were then one of the critical components of Pfizer wouldn't be reaching them
Hopefully it can help the EMA move past any politics (and Russia likewise in whatever production facilities inspections necessary) and "quickly" finish the approval application, to allow developing countries that are not yet comfortable accepting it to do so.

Michel's is another weirdly confrontational jibe, thinking of sinking in and accepting we'll have increasingly poor relations over at least the next decade until we all get bored of, or break, the stick.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5507
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Raab has written to the EU denouncing their vaccine export ban claim, so it's very probably true.

because technically this isn't a ban...
"The UK Government has an agreement with AstraZeneca to supply 100 million doses of the University of Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine, and have agreed delivery timescales for this.
"The detail of any commercial agreements between the UK government and AstraZeneca for the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine are commercially sensitive."

"I wasn't going to settle for a contract that allowed the Oxford vaccine to be delivered to others around the world before us. I was insisting we could keep all of the British public safe as my primary responsibility as the Health Secretary," he said.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
tc27
Posts: 2559
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Lobby wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:17 am
tc27 wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:12 am
We have been reliably informed that public health policy is the single most important factor in national death rates.
I have said my piece on this - a really bizarre claim.
Dpedin won't be satisfied until we have all signed affidavits confirming that we agree that Boris ("the Bumblecunt") is personally and solely responsible for every single death in the UK.
Yes and whilst academics in every other field of science and humanities can never agree about anything less than a year into a global epidemic the decisive research is complete - its slight variations in policies (for example having 5 tiers instead of 4 or using a different slogan to 'Hands, Space, Face') that are the most important factors. :wtf:
Ovals
Posts: 1573
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:52 pm

Saint wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 10:31 am
TheNatalShark wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 10:24 am
Saint wrote: Thu Mar 04, 2021 5:36 pm

That's pretty much ended any long term pharma investment in Italy then
Now this is an interestingly ironic development, although obviously negotiations would have been more or less completed before the Aus export ban, and production will only seem to come online at a point where it will likely not be at any risk of forming part of Italy's current plans and potential confiscation.

https://www.thehindu.com/news/internati ... 0.ece/amp/

Getting more positive by the day that the developing world won't have to wait until late 2022 before seeing meaningful levels of jabs available.
It's certainly unexpected.

I also see that the EU is accusing the UK of implementing an export ban of all vaccine and vaccine components. Not sure what the angle is here, as if we were then one of the critical components of Pfizer wouldn't be reaching them
It's extremely embarrassing for the EU; that the, recently, ex member of the EU is having an extremely succesful (independent) vaccine programme - whilst the EU controlled programme has been an utter shambles. Hence, the mud slinging form them - it's just deflection and trying to paint themselves as the good guys. Not sure it will cut much ice with the members.
TheNatalShark
Posts: 1298
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm

Ovals wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 11:02 am It's extremely embarrassing for the EU; that the, recently, ex member of the EU is having an extremely succesful (independent) vaccine programme - whilst the EU controlled programme has been an utter shambles. Hence, the mud slinging form them - it's just deflection and trying to paint themselves as the good guys. Not sure it will cut much ice with the members.
Supposedly 8-9 million doses moved from EU to UK, so 20% of what EU has so far managed to administer (and rough third of what we have). If seniors keep slinging, some will stick. Europe has a strong right wing media too who would gladly see seizing means of production, but they don't tend to be as good at controlling narratives as ours.

If we had exported such a % of completed doses Vs domestically administered without trying to claim a moral high ground as Global Britain, I imagine Bojo's head would have been firmly placed on a spike on tower of London with Cameron invited to stick his todger in the proverbial pig by lunchtime.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6672
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 10:52 am Raab has written to the EU denouncing their vaccine export ban claim, so it's very probably true.

because technically this isn't a ban...
"The UK Government has an agreement with AstraZeneca to supply 100 million doses of the University of Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine, and have agreed delivery timescales for this.
"The detail of any commercial agreements between the UK government and AstraZeneca for the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine are commercially sensitive."

"I wasn't going to settle for a contract that allowed the Oxford vaccine to be delivered to others around the world before us. I was insisting we could keep all of the British public safe as my primary responsibility as the Health Secretary," he said.
No, it's not a ban, and that is pretty clear. The EU can, and does, cock things up and make untrue statements on occasion.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 11:38 am
Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 10:52 am Raab has written to the EU denouncing their vaccine export ban claim, so it's very probably true.

because technically this isn't a ban...
"The UK Government has an agreement with AstraZeneca to supply 100 million doses of the University of Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine, and have agreed delivery timescales for this.
"The detail of any commercial agreements between the UK government and AstraZeneca for the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine are commercially sensitive."

"I wasn't going to settle for a contract that allowed the Oxford vaccine to be delivered to others around the world before us. I was insisting we could keep all of the British public safe as my primary responsibility as the Health Secretary," he said.
No, it's not a ban, and that is pretty clear. The EU can, and does, cock things up and make untrue statements on occasion.
The EU are claiming a ban on all vaccine components. But there's a component of the Pfizer vaccine that is only manufactured in the UK and the US, and at the very minimum that's still being exported. If the EU want to try and claim that we're banning exports of AZ to them then they can go and knock themselves out for all I care.
User avatar
Lobby
Posts: 1875
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2020 7:34 pm

Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 11:38 am
Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 10:52 am Raab has written to the EU denouncing their vaccine export ban claim, so it's very probably true.

because technically this isn't a ban...
"The UK Government has an agreement with AstraZeneca to supply 100 million doses of the University of Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine, and have agreed delivery timescales for this.
"The detail of any commercial agreements between the UK government and AstraZeneca for the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine are commercially sensitive."

"I wasn't going to settle for a contract that allowed the Oxford vaccine to be delivered to others around the world before us. I was insisting we could keep all of the British public safe as my primary responsibility as the Health Secretary," he said.
No, it's not a ban, and that is pretty clear. The EU can, and does, cock things up and make untrue statements on occasion.
And as Saint has pointed out, while we may not have exported any vaccines as yet, we are the only supplier of a vital ingredient of the Pfizer vaccine being manufactured in Europe, and so the EU's claim that we have banned the export of 'vaccine components' is demonstrably untrue.
User avatar
Calculon
Posts: 1827
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:25 pm

shaggy wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:00 pm
Tichtheid wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 9:35 pm
tc27 wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 9:26 pm The US has generally had less deaths per head than most European countries, many states have had far less stringent lock-downs and their economy has suffered far less and is now bouncing back strongly (plus they are all getting a cash boost from the US government). Ohh and they are vaccinating quicker than anyone except for the UK.

At some point we are going to have to ask why Europe suffered the worst out of all the all the worlds developed areas despite the far greater social welfare systems and socialized health care than most. It may not be comfortable for us.

I don't know if this will be shown to be a factor, but the US has a population density of 36 people per sqr km, compared to the EU's 112. The median age in the US is 38.3 years, in the EU it's 43.7.
We have been reliably informed that public health policy is the single most important factor in national death rates.
It’s probably pointless to generalize too much. If you look at countries like Japan, Taiwan, Korea, Vietnam, China, Australia, New Zealand etc, the main factor in their success is quite possibly public health policies which would include shutting down borders early, track and trace, and in China’s case a strict initial lockdown. While I agree that Europe hasn’t done particularly well there is considerable variation amongst European countries when it comes to death rate per capita and it is factually incorrect to say that the US has had less deaths per head than most European countries.
Ovals
Posts: 1573
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:52 pm

Calculon wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 11:56 am
shaggy wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:00 pm
Tichtheid wrote: Mon Mar 08, 2021 9:35 pm


I don't know if this will be shown to be a factor, but the US has a population density of 36 people per sqr km, compared to the EU's 112. The median age in the US is 38.3 years, in the EU it's 43.7.
We have been reliably informed that public health policy is the single most important factor in national death rates.
It’s probably pointless to generalize too much. If you look at countries like Japan, Taiwan, Korea, Vietnam, China, Australia, New Zealand etc, the main factor in their success is quite possibly public health policies which would include shutting down borders early, track and trace, and in China’s case a strict initial lockdown. While I agree that Europe hasn’t done particularly well there is considerable variation amongst European countries when it comes to death rate per capita and it is factually incorrect to say that the US has had less deaths per head than most European countries.
Levels of obesity have a much stronger correlation with death rates.

And, of course;
The coronavirus variant first discovered in Kent may be up to twice as deadly as previous variants, new research suggests.

The more infectious variant, which swept across the UK at the end of last year before spreading across the world, is between 30% and 100% more deadly, a new study has found.

Epidemiologists from the Universities of Exeter and Bristol said the data suggested the variant was associated with a significantly higher mortality rate among adults diagnosed in the community, compared with previously circulating variants.
Post Reply