Page 2 of 2

Re: Uber business model fecked

Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2021 8:18 pm
by I like neeps
Ymx wrote: Sat Feb 20, 2021 8:07 pm
Lemoentjie wrote: Sat Feb 20, 2021 2:29 pm Service - very good
Business model - horrible
No one is forced to use an Uber or be an Uber driver
It's easy for qualified secure people to tell other people what they can and cannot do.

Re: Uber business model fecked

Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2021 8:53 pm
by Biffer
Ymx wrote: Sat Feb 20, 2021 8:07 pm
Lemoentjie wrote: Sat Feb 20, 2021 2:29 pm Service - very good
Business model - horrible
No one is forced to use an Uber or be an Uber driver
Straight out of the neoclassical economics playbook, well parroted.

It's a line that's usually said by someone who's never struggled to find work.

Re: Uber business model fecked

Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2021 9:03 pm
by Ymx
Ok, I think you’ve both said it fairly kindly (thankfully this is NPR).

What you’re saying is

Image

Re: Uber business model fecked

Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2021 9:23 pm
by Gumboot
Image

Re: Uber business model fecked

Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2021 9:29 pm
by Cartman
Are their competitors treating their drivers as workers? Can only think of one now (lyft) but there must be quite a few now.

Re: Uber business model fecked

Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2021 11:00 pm
by Guy Smiley
Ymx wrote: Sat Feb 20, 2021 9:03 pm Ok, I think you’ve both said it fairly kindly (thankfully this is NPR).

What you’re saying is

Image
Something that popped up recently about that sort of thing...

‘It’s not so much that you made good choices, it’s the fact you had a choice to make’

Re: Uber business model fecked

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 8:59 am
by Biffer
Just to add, people choosing to work for Uber doesn’t remove Uber’s legal obligations to their workers. They have to obey the law. And every level of the court system within the UK said they weren’t.

Re: Uber business model fecked

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 9:03 am
by Lemoentjie
Ymx wrote: Sat Feb 20, 2021 8:07 pm
Lemoentjie wrote: Sat Feb 20, 2021 2:29 pm Service - very good
Business model - horrible
No one is forced to use an Uber or be an Uber driver
In the same way that young boys in Midwest USA or North England weren't forced to work down horrible mines for very low wages, they did it because they loved it so much :crazy:

Re: Uber business model fecked

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 4:24 pm
by Ymx
Biffer wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 8:59 am Just to add, people choosing to work for Uber doesn’t remove Uber’s legal obligations to their workers. They have to obey the law. And every level of the court system within the UK said they weren’t.
Except they were operating as revenue sharing own time keeping contractors until, well now.

I do wonder which other equivalent business models this will break.

Re: Uber business model fecked

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 4:55 pm
by I like neeps
Ymx wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 4:24 pm
Biffer wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 8:59 am Just to add, people choosing to work for Uber doesn’t remove Uber’s legal obligations to their workers. They have to obey the law. And every level of the court system within the UK said they weren’t.
Except they were operating as revenue sharing own time keeping contractors until, well now.

I do wonder which other equivalent business models this will break.
Lyft and Deliveroo probably have kept their lawyers busy this weekend.

I wonder if Uber will stay in London. It's tricky, one of few profitable cities for them but the regulatory requirements are causing them all sorts of trouble.

Re: Uber business model fecked

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 5:06 pm
by Mahoney
I seem to remember reading somewhere that Uber were simultaneously arguing the drivers are employees for the sake of a different (regulatory?) lawsuit. In some way Uber’s model relied on them being employees to keep some of UK law happy whilst not being employees to make the pricing work, so it was just a matter of time before the law stuffed them in the UK one way or the other.

May be a bit garbled - my 10 second google failed to find the article.

Re: Uber business model fecked

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 5:14 pm
by Biffer
Mahoney wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 5:06 pm I seem to remember reading somewhere that Uber were simultaneously arguing the drivers are employees for the sake of a different (regulatory?) lawsuit. In some way Uber’s model relied on them being employees to keep some of UK law happy whilst not being employees to make the pricing work, so it was just a matter of time before the law stuffed them in the UK one way or the other.

May be a bit garbled - my 10 second google failed to find the article.
Yeah, that was to allow them to get a license from the m TfL to operate in London. They talked about their drivers and their customers.

Same lawyers doing the arguing in both cases, as was pointed out by the judge in the original tribunal.

Re: Uber business model fecked

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 5:15 pm
by Biffer
Ymx wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 4:24 pm
Biffer wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 8:59 am Just to add, people choosing to work for Uber doesn’t remove Uber’s legal obligations to their workers. They have to obey the law. And every level of the court system within the UK said they weren’t.
Except they were operating as revenue sharing own time keeping contractors until, well now.

I do wonder which other equivalent business models this will break.
Except that was illegal.

Re: Uber business model fecked

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 5:46 pm
by Uncle fester
Never ceases to amaze me the number of people who applaud a return to early 20th century employment practices just so that they can get a slightly better service or cheaper price.