It's 1986, South Africa is on fire. The Nationalist Party clings desperately onto power. Grand Apartheid prevails. The regime has allies, the people of the UK are sympathetic and their leader Margaret Thatcher reflects the popular opinion and throws her weight behind PW Botha
The South African government are under huge pressure though. The rest of the world have imposed a cultural and economic blockade on the Republic. They're desparate for a moral boost, a propaganda coup.
A rebel tour, but who? Who would be morally bankrupt enough to sell their soul? The Australians? Apartheid gold proved an easy sell for Kim Hughes and his band of craven greedy sellouts.
Surprisingly it took relatively little persuasion and a bit of silver to persuade a number of eminent Kiwis to accept the offer to whitewash this criminal state. Buck Shelford, Colin Meads - manager, Grant Fox, Steve Pokere, Bill Osborne and many others disgraced themselves and chose to ignore the suffering of 35 million repressed black people.
They belong in the same basket of shame as Izzy Folau. Their endorsement of apartheid was a crime that makes his look like chicken feed
Izzy Folau vs Buck Shelford
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11945
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
What have the All Blacks ever done for us, eh? Eh?ASMO wrote: Mon Apr 12, 2021 11:52 am Those Romans were a bunch of cunts too, massacres galore on populations that disagreed with them...cunts
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5506
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Should we still be boycotting all the companies that still traded with/in Apartheid SA?
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11945
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Still is a bit of a stain on the self proclamation as spiritual guardians blah blahInsane_Homer wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 12:33 pm Should we still be boycotting all the companies that still traded with/in Apartheid SA?
I am in two minds as how South Africa should have been treated. And I wonder if isolation was the best. To my mind one of the most persuasive things that changed many people’s mind was The Cosby Show which showed us that the Huxtable family was no different from the white families. An aspect we didn’t see in South Africa, and I think it was shows like this that changed many people.
On the other side the British actors group, Equiity I think, banned all British shows from being viewed in South Africa and so didn’t influence us in any way.
Did these “shameful” tours show us what we were missing and stop us from turning inwards, or dud they make us think that we could carry on as before? As I said, I am in two minds.
On the other side the British actors group, Equiity I think, banned all British shows from being viewed in South Africa and so didn’t influence us in any way.
Did these “shameful” tours show us what we were missing and stop us from turning inwards, or dud they make us think that we could carry on as before? As I said, I am in two minds.
35 years.....you should learn to forgive and forgetFalseBayFC wrote: Mon Apr 12, 2021 10:30 am It's 1986, South Africa is on fire. The Nationalist Party clings desperately onto power. Grand Apartheid prevails. The regime has allies, the people of the UK are sympathetic and their leader Margaret Thatcher reflects the popular opinion and throws her weight behind PW Botha
The South African government are under huge pressure though. The rest of the world have imposed a cultural and economic blockade on the Republic. They're desparate for a moral boost, a propaganda coup.
A rebel tour, but who? Who would be morally bankrupt enough to sell their soul? The Australians? Apartheid gold proved an easy sell for Kim Hughes and his band of craven greedy sellouts.
Surprisingly it took relatively little persuasion and a bit of silver to persuade a number of eminent Kiwis to accept the offer to whitewash this criminal state. Buck Shelford, Colin Meads - manager, Grant Fox, Steve Pokere, Bill Osborne and many others disgraced themselves and chose to ignore the suffering of 35 million repressed black people.
They belong in the same basket of shame as Izzy Folau. Their endorsement of apartheid was a crime that makes his look like chicken feed
The Rebel Tours were stupid and in my gut certainly prolonged the opinion in the minds of the National Party and their supporters that Apartheid was ok.Fangle wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 11:27 pm I am in two minds as how South Africa should have been treated. And I wonder if isolation was the best. To my mind one of the most persuasive things that changed many people’s mind was The Cosby Show which showed us that the Huxtable family was no different from the white families. An aspect we didn’t see in South Africa, and I think it was shows like this that changed many people.
On the other side the British actors group, Equiity I think, banned all British shows from being viewed in South Africa and so didn’t influence us in any way.
Did these “shameful” tours show us what we were missing and stop us from turning inwards, or dud they make us think that we could carry on as before? As I said, I am in two minds.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11945
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Yup. Because the Huxtables (like the Drummonds in Different Strokes or the Banks in Fresh Prince) are a real representation of black families in the US? There is an argument that these shows caused more damage than good because they were simply assuaging white guilt.Fangle wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 11:27 pm The Cosby Show which showed us that the Huxtable family was no different from the white families.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5506
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Yup, wasn't there a Trust and Reconciliation thingy to specifically leave all that shit in the past?
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- average joe
- Posts: 1893
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 5:46 am
- Location: kuvukiland
I preferred Sanford and Son. The old guy was hilarious.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Apr 15, 2021 8:07 amYup. Because the Huxtables (like the Drummonds in Different Strokes or the Banks in Fresh Prince) are a real representation of black families in the US? There is an argument that these shows caused more damage than good because they were simply assuaging white guilt.Fangle wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 11:27 pm The Cosby Show which showed us that the Huxtable family was no different from the white families.
Yeeb wrote: Thu Apr 15, 2021 7:14 pm I wonder how this falsbay chap feels after a quarter century of democracy in SA, that there are still millions of black people oppressed, only now they are oppressed by black people.
Oh, and![]()
At least the blacks in South Africa now have the comfort of knowing that their oppression is the same as the oppression suffered by blacks in the rest of Africa though. Oppression is only noteworthy if it's racist oppression don't forget.