WTF is going on at P&O

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7414
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

P&O ferries sacked all 800 of the crew this afternoon having cancelled all sailings today.
Staff were told they were losing their jobs by video message, and then private security guards were sent to remove them from their ships.
The No 10 spokesperson said officials were in “urgent” talks to find out what the company’s plans were. He said that, if the company were planning to fire staff and then employ them again on worse terms - so-called “fire and rehire” - the government would be “dismayed”. He said:

Security staff were preparing to remove crew from ships in Dover and Larne, Belfast, after unions instructed crew not to leave vessels. Coaches carrying replacement agency staff – brought in from Colombia, according to reports in the French press – were reported to be standing by at Dover and Hull.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2 ... uncement
inactionman
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am

They're losing a fair few quid and thought this would be a good cost-saving - sacking permanent employees and bringing in poverty-wage temp workers.

Disgraceful.

They were re-bought by some middle-eastern outfit a few years back, so can't believe there's much - if any - engagement or interaction with unions.
inactionman
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am

And the government needs to be more than 'dismayed'.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7414
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

inactionman wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 5:32 pm They're losing a fair few quid and thought this would be a good cost-saving - sacking permanent employees and bringing in poverty-wage temp workers.

Disgraceful.

They were re-bought by some middle-eastern outfit a few years back, so can't believe there's much - if any - engagement or interaction with unions.
Dubai owned and they also own 2 UK Freeports. Took a shitload of Covid money from the government as well whi hasn't been repayed
User avatar
Hal Jordan
Posts: 4689
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
Location: Sector 2814

inactionman wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 5:34 pm And the government needs to be more than 'dismayed'.
Given the views of this Government towards industrial relations, I would have thought they'd be engorged at mass sackings in favour of dirt cheap labour. Profits and doubles all round!
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8866
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Another Brexit Benefit !

An it'll make the NIP a lot easier to enforce, if NI businesses have no choice but to import, & export thru the ROI ports :grin:
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

Brexit?

Doesn’t Brexit limit immigration, so cheap Labour forces not as easy to substitute in.

Or is it all international employees and not at all related?
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8866
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Ymx wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:50 pm Brexit?

Doesn’t Brexit limit immigration, so cheap Labour forces not as easy to substitute in.

Or is it all international employees and not at all related?
It just stops freedom of movement from the EU. It'll be interesting to hear where these Agency workers who're replacing the P&O crews are coming from, & what their contracts are. The Tories are doing their best to sound outraged, but this kind of shit doesn't happen without them previously hollowing out workers rights over years.
shaggy
Posts: 458
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:11 am

fishfoodie wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 8:01 pm
Ymx wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:50 pm Brexit?

Doesn’t Brexit limit immigration, so cheap Labour forces not as easy to substitute in.

Or is it all international employees and not at all related?
It just stops freedom of movement from the EU. It'll be interesting to hear where these Agency workers who're replacing the P&O crews are coming from, & what their contracts are. The Tories are doing their best to sound outraged, but this kind of shit doesn't happen without them previously hollowing out workers rights over years.
The crew will be international and from many locations such is the maritime labour market. This is not a British issue, the only places that protect are US, Canada and Australia.
mos_eisely_
Posts: 184
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:51 am

inactionman wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 5:34 pm And the government needs to be more than 'dismayed'.
Given that yesterday the Prime Minster met with the the ultimate owners of DP World (UAE Crown Prince) it's likely he new in advance this was going to happen
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8866
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

shaggy wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 9:48 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 8:01 pm
Ymx wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:50 pm Brexit?

Doesn’t Brexit limit immigration, so cheap Labour forces not as easy to substitute in.

Or is it all international employees and not at all related?
It just stops freedom of movement from the EU. It'll be interesting to hear where these Agency workers who're replacing the P&O crews are coming from, & what their contracts are. The Tories are doing their best to sound outraged, but this kind of shit doesn't happen without them previously hollowing out workers rights over years.
The crew will be international and from many locations such is the maritime labour market. This is not a British issue, the only places that protect are US, Canada and Australia.
The UK controls what happens on UK flagged vessels !, & as these vessels are running routes under contracts, they also control the Ts & Cs.

It's a cop out to just throw your hands up in the air, & claim there's nothing the UK Government can do.
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

shaggy wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 9:48 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 8:01 pm
Ymx wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:50 pm Brexit?

Doesn’t Brexit limit immigration, so cheap Labour forces not as easy to substitute in.

Or is it all international employees and not at all related?
It just stops freedom of movement from the EU. It'll be interesting to hear where these Agency workers who're replacing the P&O crews are coming from, & what their contracts are. The Tories are doing their best to sound outraged, but this kind of shit doesn't happen without them previously hollowing out workers rights over years.
The crew will be international and from many locations such is the maritime labour market. This is not a British issue, the only places that protect are US, Canada and Australia.
Yep. That’s kind of what I was wondering.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 10676
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

fishfoodie wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 10:06 pm
shaggy wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 9:48 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 8:01 pm

It just stops freedom of movement from the EU. It'll be interesting to hear where these Agency workers who're replacing the P&O crews are coming from, & what their contracts are. The Tories are doing their best to sound outraged, but this kind of shit doesn't happen without them previously hollowing out workers rights over years.
The crew will be international and from many locations such is the maritime labour market. This is not a British issue, the only places that protect are US, Canada and Australia.
The UK controls what happens on UK flagged vessels !, & as these vessels are running routes under contracts, they also control the Ts & Cs.

It's a cop out to just throw your hands up in the air, & claim there's nothing the UK Government can do.

Exactly. P&O is a British shipping company, as such they are obliged to notify the government if they are making redundancies over a certain number (I think it's 100)

The UK Gov says they have had no notification
Glaston
Posts: 484
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:35 am

fishfoodie wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 8:01 pm
Ymx wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:50 pm Brexit?

Doesn’t Brexit limit immigration, so cheap Labour forces not as easy to substitute in.

Or is it all international employees and not at all related?
It just stops freedom of movement from the EU. It'll be interesting to hear where these Agency workers who're replacing the P&O crews are coming from, & what their contracts are. The Tories are doing their best to sound outraged, but this kind of shit doesn't happen without them previously hollowing out workers rights over years.
What workers rights have changed since the UK left the eu?


In any case it will end up in the law courts
https://www.gov.uk/redundancy-your-rights/consultation
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8866
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Glaston wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 10:58 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 8:01 pm
Ymx wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:50 pm Brexit?

Doesn’t Brexit limit immigration, so cheap Labour forces not as easy to substitute in.

Or is it all international employees and not at all related?
It just stops freedom of movement from the EU. It'll be interesting to hear where these Agency workers who're replacing the P&O crews are coming from, & what their contracts are. The Tories are doing their best to sound outraged, but this kind of shit doesn't happen without them previously hollowing out workers rights over years.
What workers rights have changed since the UK left the eu?


In any case it will end up in the law courts
https://www.gov.uk/redundancy-your-rights/consultation
Well the Court of last resort is now the UK Supreme court; the one the Tories want to either remove, or make judicial appointments purely political ....
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8866
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Tichtheid wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 10:14 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 10:06 pm
shaggy wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 9:48 pm

The crew will be international and from many locations such is the maritime labour market. This is not a British issue, the only places that protect are US, Canada and Australia.
The UK controls what happens on UK flagged vessels !, & as these vessels are running routes under contracts, they also control the Ts & Cs.

It's a cop out to just throw your hands up in the air, & claim there's nothing the UK Government can do.

Exactly. P&O is a British shipping company, as such they are obliged to notify the government if they are making redundancies over a certain number (I think it's 100)

The UK Gov says they have had no notification
Are there alternative operators for the Scottish Isles ?

Ireland, & Dover are okay, because there are alternatives; but the Isles could be proper screwed if P&O just decide to go into Liquidation.
TheNatalShark
Posts: 1333
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm

Glaston wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 10:58 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 8:01 pm
Ymx wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:50 pm Brexit?

Doesn’t Brexit limit immigration, so cheap Labour forces not as easy to substitute in.

Or is it all international employees and not at all related?
It just stops freedom of movement from the EU. It'll be interesting to hear where these Agency workers who're replacing the P&O crews are coming from, & what their contracts are. The Tories are doing their best to sound outraged, but this kind of shit doesn't happen without them previously hollowing out workers rights over years.
What workers rights have changed since the UK left the eu?


In any case it will end up in the law courts
https://www.gov.uk/redundancy-your-rights/consultation
It's not a "Brexit has caused this" case (as some seem desperate to claim with explanation), but rather a possible demonstration of its futility - the RMT said we needed to leave the EU in order to prevent these job losses and in this manner. Well we've left over 2 years ago and it is the non-EU jobs currently culled, whilst those P&O staff in France and Netherlands have remained, potentially a result of the the stronger labour laws that aren't inhibited by the EU, as the RMT claimed they were.

Its political effort could have been expended on something useful to these P&O staff.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12063
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

inactionman wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 5:32 pm They're losing a fair few quid and thought this would be a good cost-saving - sacking permanent employees and bringing in poverty-wage temp workers.
They'll be slaughtered for constructive dismissal.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 10676
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

fishfoodie wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:37 pm
Tichtheid wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 10:14 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 10:06 pm

The UK controls what happens on UK flagged vessels !, & as these vessels are running routes under contracts, they also control the Ts & Cs.

It's a cop out to just throw your hands up in the air, & claim there's nothing the UK Government can do.

Exactly. P&O is a British shipping company, as such they are obliged to notify the government if they are making redundancies over a certain number (I think it's 100)

The UK Gov says they have had no notification
Are there alternative operators for the Scottish Isles ?

Ireland, & Dover are okay, because there are alternatives; but the Isles could be proper screwed if P&O just decide to go into Liquidation.

Caledonian MacBrayne, or CalMac run the ferries to the Scottish islands

I think they are owned by the Scottish Government
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6735
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Tichtheid wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:29 am
fishfoodie wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:37 pm
Tichtheid wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 10:14 pm


Exactly. P&O is a British shipping company, as such they are obliged to notify the government if they are making redundancies over a certain number (I think it's 100)

The UK Gov says they have had no notification
Are there alternative operators for the Scottish Isles ?

Ireland, & Dover are okay, because there are alternatives; but the Isles could be proper screwed if P&O just decide to go into Liquidation.

Caledonian MacBrayne, or CalMac run the ferries to the Scottish islands

I think they are owned by the Scottish Government
Given the low prices and the very old ferries I think that's a safe assumption.
As I understand it this is just part of P&O as well?

Utterly disgraceful stuff, you wonder how the execs slept last night pulling a tactic like this.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5529
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Image

Image

Image

Image Image

:clap:
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5529
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
duke
Posts: 836
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 6:54 am
Location: Smallsbury

Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 9:08 am
Tichtheid wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:29 am
fishfoodie wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:37 pm

Are there alternative operators for the Scottish Isles ?

Ireland, & Dover are okay, because there are alternatives; but the Isles could be proper screwed if P&O just decide to go into Liquidation.

Caledonian MacBrayne, or CalMac run the ferries to the Scottish islands

I think they are owned by the Scottish Government
Given the low prices and the very old ferries I think that's a safe assumption.
As I understand it this is just part of P&O as well?

Utterly disgraceful stuff, you wonder how the execs slept last night pulling a tactic like this.
No, Scottish Government owned
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6735
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

duke wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 9:46 am
Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 9:08 am
Tichtheid wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:29 am


Caledonian MacBrayne, or CalMac run the ferries to the Scottish islands

I think they are owned by the Scottish Government
Given the low prices and the very old ferries I think that's a safe assumption.
As I understand it this is just part of P&O as well?

Utterly disgraceful stuff, you wonder how the execs slept last night pulling a tactic like this.
No, Scottish Government owned
Ah no, I meant the people being fired. Don't think it's all routes/cruises etc.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
dpedin
Posts: 3394
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

This seems more than just a cost cutting exercise by P&O and parent company DP World. DP World is hardly short of cash, they pay 2-3x more in golf sponsorship than savings they are making with this dodgy move. Looks like there might be some dodgy Russian politics involved in the background - the P&O issue is crippling channel crossings and freight movement. As PG Woodehouse would say 'wheels within wheels'.
I like neeps
Posts: 3823
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

dpedin wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 9:56 am This seems more than just a cost cutting exercise by P&O and parent company DP World. DP World is hardly short of cash, they pay 2-3x more in golf sponsorship than savings they are making with this dodgy move. Looks like there might be some dodgy Russian politics involved in the background - the P&O issue is crippling channel crossings and freight movement. As PG Woodehouse would say 'wheels within wheels'.
DP world don't make their money for golf sponsorship by allowing unprofitable businesses like P&O to continue as is. This is classic PE bloodsucking rather than any conspiracy.
User avatar
ASMO
Posts: 5615
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:08 pm

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 6:32 am
inactionman wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 5:32 pm They're losing a fair few quid and thought this would be a good cost-saving - sacking permanent employees and bringing in poverty-wage temp workers.
They'll be slaughtered for constructive dismissal.
Well if they have been made redundant, legally their positions no longer exist in the organisation so P&O cannot rehire to the same positions for 6 months.
User avatar
Hal Jordan
Posts: 4689
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
Location: Sector 2814

Insane_Homer wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 9:44 am
Britannia Unchained at last!
weegie01
Posts: 1003
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:34 pm

To pick up a couple of points made on the thread, it is years since I retired, but back then someone could not be made redundant if the job continued to exist, which appears to be the case here since they are rehiring. Similarly, redundancies on this scale could not be made without prior consultations.

So how is this possible?
User avatar
Jimmy Smallsteps
Posts: 914
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:24 pm
Location: Auckland

You're a fucking goose if you sign up for that shit anyway.

2 or 3 days is as much as I can stand being told what to do at certain points during the day.
User avatar
Lobby
Posts: 1880
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2020 7:34 pm

weegie01 wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 1:22 pm To pick up a couple of points made on the thread, it is years since I retired, but back then someone could not be made redundant if the job continued to exist, which appears to be the case here since they are rehiring. Similarly, redundancies on this scale could not be made without prior consultations.

So how is this possible?
P&O’s actions are almost certainly illegal, so the short answer is it’s not possible under UK law. But as we all know, lots of businesses regularly ignore employment law.

The main unions involved are obtaining legal advice, and I expect this will end up in Court. Whether that will help employees get their jobs back remains to be seen.
inactionman
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am

weegie01 wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 1:22 pm To pick up a couple of points made on the thread, it is years since I retired, but back then someone could not be made redundant if the job continued to exist, which appears to be the case here since they are rehiring. Similarly, redundancies on this scale could not be made without prior consultations.

So how is this possible?
It does seem to go against most of the employment law I'm familiar with. I'm not exactly sure how a corporate restructure works in the context of ships' crew - I can't believe a pilot is now a redundant role.

Think there's some mileage in rumours of external shenanigans, as I'd hope this would generate a nuclear response through which both P&O and the parent company would get fingers badly burnt.
pjm1
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2021 11:33 am

From what I've heard and read, they haven't made any positions redundant. They've just binned everyone en-masse. Disgraceful and if UK employment law applies, totally in contravention of it. Unfair dismissal (rather than constructive as another poster suggested). However, it will depend on whether P&O have somehow structured their contracts under different jurisdiction than E&W.

Just like how Britannia Hotels binned a load of staff when Covid hit and re-hired cheaper ones on zero hours contracts - I won't be using P&O again and I don't stay in Britannia hotels. We have to vote with our feet on shit like this.

And I say that as a capitalist!
User avatar
ASMO
Posts: 5615
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:08 pm

pjm1 wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 1:50 pm From what I've heard and read, they haven't made any positions redundant. They've just binned everyone en-masse. Disgraceful and if UK employment law applies, totally in contravention of it. Unfair dismissal (rather than constructive as another poster suggested). However, it will depend on whether P&O have somehow structured their contracts under different jurisdiction than E&W.

Just like how Britannia Hotels binned a load of staff when Covid hit and re-hired cheaper ones on zero hours contracts - I won't be using P&O again and I don't stay in Britannia hotels. We have to vote with our feet on shit like this.

And I say that as a capitalist!
100% this, fuck both of them, and spoons too
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8866
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

There's no way the Government knew nothing of this.

It'll take a few days, but I'm sure someone in the CS will leak ,a letter, or whatever, but we've all seen how long it took the Home Office to issue 800 visas, with the entire CS helping them !

It also shows the vaunted, Points Based Immigration system for the fraud it is, because there's no way that a large number of this people are earning the ~£35k minimum wage.

P&O had everything setup & ready to go simultaneously; down to the hired thugs to throw the unsurprisingly pissed off staff off the ferries.
I like neeps
Posts: 3823
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am



The government have responded by sending strongly worded letters to the P&O chairman...

.... Who resigned last year :lol:
Slick
Posts: 13576
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Tichtheid wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:29 am
fishfoodie wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:37 pm
Tichtheid wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 10:14 pm


Exactly. P&O is a British shipping company, as such they are obliged to notify the government if they are making redundancies over a certain number (I think it's 100)

The UK Gov says they have had no notification
Are there alternative operators for the Scottish Isles ?

Ireland, & Dover are okay, because there are alternatives; but the Isles could be proper screwed if P&O just decide to go into Liquidation.

Caledonian MacBrayne, or CalMac run the ferries to the Scottish islands

I think they are owned by the Scottish Government
They are, and they are an absolute disgrace
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 10676
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

Slick wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 6:11 pm
Tichtheid wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:29 am
fishfoodie wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:37 pm

Are there alternative operators for the Scottish Isles ?

Ireland, & Dover are okay, because there are alternatives; but the Isles could be proper screwed if P&O just decide to go into Liquidation.

Caledonian MacBrayne, or CalMac run the ferries to the Scottish islands

I think they are owned by the Scottish Government
They are, and they are an absolute disgrace

Tell me your complaints and I'll ask my mate who captains one of the ferries.

He might well agree with you.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8866
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

I like neeps wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 6:06 pm
The government have responded by sending strongly worded letters to the P&O chairman...

.... Who resigned last year :lol:
So now we know when the Chairman knew of this plan .... so it would be good if there was an urgent question from say the SNP, to
ask the Pritster if her Ministry was aware that when it issued these Visas, that they were replacing all the existing crews
Slick
Posts: 13576
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Tichtheid wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 9:48 pm
Slick wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 6:11 pm
Tichtheid wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:29 am


Caledonian MacBrayne, or CalMac run the ferries to the Scottish islands

I think they are owned by the Scottish Government
They are, and they are an absolute disgrace

Tell me your complaints and I'll ask my mate who captains one of the ferries.

He might well agree with you.
Well the main one being it is an ageing fleet that isn’t being replaced due to incompetence leading to huge cuts in the service on a daily basis.

The state owned shipyards that are meant to build the state owned ferries are so badly run that the newest ones are being built in Turkey.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Post Reply