FW de Klerk gooooooooooooooooooooooornneeee

Where goats go to escape
Big Nipper
Posts: 845
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:08 am

Gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooorne

Image
Last edited by Big Nipper on Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
assfly
Posts: 4652
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 6:30 am

FW?
Big Nipper
Posts: 845
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:08 am

assfly wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:32 amFW?
Fixxxed, slip of the finger
User avatar
assfly
Posts: 4652
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 6:30 am

Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:32 am Fixxxed, slip of the finger
The excitement getting to you? :lol:
Lemoentjie
Posts: 642
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am

Bit classless to celebrate someone's death like that.

All I'll say is that he is certainly one of the biggest figures in South Africa's history as a state.
Big Nipper
Posts: 845
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:08 am

Lemoentjie wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:38 am Bit classless to celebrate someone's death like that.

All I'll say is that he is certainly one of the biggest figures in South Africa's history as a state.
The only thing that is classless is somehow making your way to the top leadership of the National Party
User avatar
assfly
Posts: 4652
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 6:30 am

He's a complicated figure, which I'm sure the response to his death will demonstrate.
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm


F.W. de Klerk, in full Frederik Willem de Klerk, (born March 18, 1936, Johannesburg, South Africa), politician who as president of South Africa (1989–94) brought the apartheid system of racial segregation to an end and negotiated a transition to majority rule in his country. He and Nelson Mandela jointly received the 1993 Nobel Prize for Peace for their collaboration in efforts to establish nonracial democracy in South Africa.
Forgive my ignorance, but the above doesn’t sound like a terrible contribution to South Africa.

But I know very little on it.
Slick
Posts: 13585
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Ymx wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:52 am

F.W. de Klerk, in full Frederik Willem de Klerk, (born March 18, 1936, Johannesburg, South Africa), politician who as president of South Africa (1989–94) brought the apartheid system of racial segregation to an end and negotiated a transition to majority rule in his country. He and Nelson Mandela jointly received the 1993 Nobel Prize for Peace for their collaboration in efforts to establish nonracial democracy in South Africa.
Forgive my ignorance, but the above doesn’t sound like a terrible contribution to South Africa.

But I know very little on it.
I think some will tell you he made that happen and others will say he was dragged kicking and screaming to it and for political expediency
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Big Nipper
Posts: 845
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:08 am

Ymx wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:52 am

F.W. de Klerk, in full Frederik Willem de Klerk, (born March 18, 1936, Johannesburg, South Africa), politician who as president of South Africa (1989–94) brought the apartheid system of racial segregation to an end and negotiated a transition to majority rule in his country. He and Nelson Mandela jointly received the 1993 Nobel Prize for Peace for their collaboration in efforts to establish nonracial democracy in South Africa.
Forgive my ignorance, but the above doesn’t sound like a terrible contribution to South Africa.

But I know very little on it.
If you believe FW brought Apartheid to an end due to his commitment to racial equality you must be smoking some strong stuff. He had no choice, the country was circling the drain due to his Apartheid cabal
User avatar
Chilli
Posts: 5652
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:15 pm
Location: In Die Baai in.

Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:01 am
Ymx wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:52 am

F.W. de Klerk, in full Frederik Willem de Klerk, (born March 18, 1936, Johannesburg, South Africa), politician who as president of South Africa (1989–94) brought the apartheid system of racial segregation to an end and negotiated a transition to majority rule in his country. He and Nelson Mandela jointly received the 1993 Nobel Prize for Peace for their collaboration in efforts to establish nonracial democracy in South Africa.
Forgive my ignorance, but the above doesn’t sound like a terrible contribution to South Africa.

But I know very little on it.
If you believe FW brought Apartheid to an end due to his commitment to racial equality you must be smoking some strong stuff. He had no choice, the country was circling the drain due to his Apartheid cabal
Very true Nips, but keep it classy.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 11911
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:01 am
Ymx wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:52 am

F.W. de Klerk, in full Frederik Willem de Klerk, (born March 18, 1936, Johannesburg, South Africa), politician who as president of South Africa (1989–94) brought the apartheid system of racial segregation to an end and negotiated a transition to majority rule in his country. He and Nelson Mandela jointly received the 1993 Nobel Prize for Peace for their collaboration in efforts to establish nonracial democracy in South Africa.
Forgive my ignorance, but the above doesn’t sound like a terrible contribution to South Africa.

But I know very little on it.
If you believe FW brought Apartheid to an end due to his commitment to racial equality you must be smoking some strong stuff. He had no choice, the country was circling the drain due to his Apartheid cabal
De Klerk was the right man at the right time leading the NP and for that South Africans should be grateful. He wasn't perfect, but at least he saw the light early and reacted in the right way.

Some of the dinosaurs before him made Mugabe look reasonable and compassionate.
Big Nipper
Posts: 845
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:08 am

He really tarnished any shred of goodwill he had last year when his foundation argued Apartheid was not a crime against humanity.
User avatar
average joe
Posts: 1895
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 5:46 am
Location: kuvukiland

Recon there's not many people who liked the guy.
Big Nipper
Posts: 845
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:08 am

average joe wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:21 am Recon there's not many people who liked the guy.
Agreed. Far right white nutjobs think he is a traitor, and the rest know him as an Apartheid stalwart
User avatar
Chilli
Posts: 5652
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:15 pm
Location: In Die Baai in.

Sandstorm wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:14 am
Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:01 am
Ymx wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:52 am

Forgive my ignorance, but the above doesn’t sound like a terrible contribution to South Africa.

But I know very little on it.
If you believe FW brought Apartheid to an end due to his commitment to racial equality you must be smoking some strong stuff. He had no choice, the country was circling the drain due to his Apartheid cabal
De Klerk was the right man at the right time leading the NP and for that South Africans should be grateful. He wasn't perfect, but at least he saw the light early and reacted in the right way.

Some of the dinosaurs before him made Mugabe look reasonable and compassionate.
Very, very true.
User avatar
Chilli
Posts: 5652
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:15 pm
Location: In Die Baai in.

Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:16 am He really tarnished any shred of goodwill he had last year when his foundation argued Apartheid was not a crime against humanity.
Not their finest hour.
User avatar
OomStruisbaai
Posts: 16060
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
Location: Longest beach in SH

Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:01 am
Ymx wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:52 am

F.W. de Klerk, in full Frederik Willem de Klerk, (born March 18, 1936, Johannesburg, South Africa), politician who as president of South Africa (1989–94) brought the apartheid system of racial segregation to an end and negotiated a transition to majority rule in his country. He and Nelson Mandela jointly received the 1993 Nobel Prize for Peace for their collaboration in efforts to establish nonracial democracy in South Africa.
Forgive my ignorance, but the above doesn’t sound like a terrible contribution to South Africa.

But I know very little on it.
If you believe FW brought Apartheid to an end due to his commitment to racial equality you must be smoking some strong stuff. He had no choice, the country was circling the drain due to his Apartheid cabal
That drain is full of kak since FWs days.
User avatar
Calculon
Posts: 1848
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:25 pm

Slick wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:01 am
Ymx wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:52 am

F.W. de Klerk, in full Frederik Willem de Klerk, (born March 18, 1936, Johannesburg, South Africa), politician who as president of South Africa (1989–94) brought the apartheid system of racial segregation to an end and negotiated a transition to majority rule in his country. He and Nelson Mandela jointly received the 1993 Nobel Prize for Peace for their collaboration in efforts to establish nonracial democracy in South Africa.
Forgive my ignorance, but the above doesn’t sound like a terrible contribution to South Africa.

But I know very little on it.
I think some will tell you he made that happen and others will say he was dragged kicking and screaming to it and for political expediency
Basically the ANC and their acolytes hate to share the credit for ending apartheid so they've done their best to rewrite history by saying fw de klerk had no choice and also to ignore the contribution of the many other anti apartheid organisations that existed at the time. Not unlike the CCP pretending that it was solely them who liberated China from the Japanese. FW is also hated by many on the right (not only Saffas ) for "betraying" white south Africans

I met him during the interval of a Bryn terfel concert in cape town, he was extremely good natured and loved talking politics.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5529
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

This thread has wonderful car-crash potential. Staying the hell away :wave:
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
sturginho
Posts: 2595
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:51 pm

Insane_Homer wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:31 am This thread has wonderful car-crash potential. Staying the hell away :wave:
spoilsport!
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:01 am
Ymx wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:52 am

F.W. de Klerk, in full Frederik Willem de Klerk, (born March 18, 1936, Johannesburg, South Africa), politician who as president of South Africa (1989–94) brought the apartheid system of racial segregation to an end and negotiated a transition to majority rule in his country. He and Nelson Mandela jointly received the 1993 Nobel Prize for Peace for their collaboration in efforts to establish nonracial democracy in South Africa.
Forgive my ignorance, but the above doesn’t sound like a terrible contribution to South Africa.

But I know very little on it.
If you believe FW brought Apartheid to an end due to his commitment to racial equality you must be smoking some strong stuff. He had no choice, the country was circling the drain due to his Apartheid cabal
I don’t think anything, as I said I know little. I was just asking after I looked him up and that was straight from wiki.
User avatar
Kiwias
Posts: 7548
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 1:44 am

I suspect the transition could have been far worse with someone else at the helm but am willing to be educated.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12063
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

assfly wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:49 am He's a complicated figure, which I'm sure the response to his death will demonstrate.
Quite. Didn't he gain a Nobel Peace Prize? :eh:
User avatar
Blake
Posts: 2682
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:28 pm
Location: Republic of Western Cape

Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:25 am
average joe wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:21 am Recon there's not many people who liked the guy.
Agreed. Far right white nutjobs think he is a traitor, and the rest know him as an Apartheid stalwart
The bar is very low, granted, but had he been a hardliner like many others in his midst, things could have gotten very ugly very fast.
He is being put on a pedestal for having done the bare minimum sure, but at the end of the day I'm glad it was him at the helm and not one of the other NP nutjobs that he was fighting against within his own party.
User avatar
Calculon
Posts: 1848
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:25 pm

I was only a youngster but I remember how shocked people were when he announced the unbanning of the ANC and SACP . The peaceful end of apartheid in the space of a few years certainly didn't seem inevitable at the time
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 5063
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

Blake wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 12:56 pm
Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:25 am
average joe wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:21 am Recon there's not many people who liked the guy.
Agreed. Far right white nutjobs think he is a traitor, and the rest know him as an Apartheid stalwart
The bar is very low, granted, but had he been a hardliner like many others in his midst, things could have gotten very ugly very fast.
He is being put on a pedestal for having done the bare minimum sure, but at the end of the day I'm glad it was him at the helm and not one of the other NP nutjobs that he was fighting against within his own party.
From the outside looking in, could another leader have gone full Ian Smith and let it go as far as bloodshed to hold onto minority rule?
User avatar
assfly
Posts: 4652
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 6:30 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 12:27 pm Quite. Didn't he gain a Nobel Peace Prize? :eh:
Yes, it was a joint award with Madiba. Controversial, but recognition for his participation in the downfall of Apartheid.
User avatar
Calculon
Posts: 1848
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:25 pm

Uncle fester wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:29 pm
Blake wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 12:56 pm
Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:25 am

Agreed. Far right white nutjobs think he is a traitor, and the rest know him as an Apartheid stalwart
The bar is very low, granted, but had he been a hardliner like many others in his midst, things could have gotten very ugly very fast.
He is being put on a pedestal for having done the bare minimum sure, but at the end of the day I'm glad it was him at the helm and not one of the other NP nutjobs that he was fighting against within his own party.
From the outside looking in, could another leader have gone full Ian Smith and let it go as far as bloodshed to hold onto minority rule?
Yes, easily
Lemoentjie
Posts: 642
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am

Uncle fester wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:29 pm From the outside looking in, could another leader have gone full Ian Smith and let it go as far as bloodshed to hold onto minority rule?
Yes, and unlike in Rhodesia, they probably would have won the war.
User avatar
assfly
Posts: 4652
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 6:30 am

Uncle fester wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:29 pm From the outside looking in, could another leader have gone full Ian Smith and let it go as far as bloodshed to hold onto minority rule?
This is an interesting comparison, and one that I think of quite a lot. Smith is still spoken about like a saviour to white Rhodesians, but all he did in my opinion was delay the inevitable and lead thousands of young men to their deaths. If power had been handed over in the mid 1960s like all the other colonies, Zimbabwe could be in such a different place now.

The fact that Mandela and de Klerk managed to avoid a civil war is something to behold.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6736
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

assfly wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:58 pm
Uncle fester wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:29 pm From the outside looking in, could another leader have gone full Ian Smith and let it go as far as bloodshed to hold onto minority rule?
This is an interesting comparison, and one that I think of quite a lot. Smith is still spoken about like a saviour to white Rhodesians, but all he did in my opinion was delay the inevitable and lead thousands of young men to their deaths. If power had been handed over in the mid 1960s like all the other colonies, Zimbabwe could be in such a different place now.

The fact that Mandela and de Klerk managed to avoid a civil war is something to behold.
AIUI Smith had the situation broadly under control until Salazar fell no? And by then the die was already cast.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
FalseBayFC
Posts: 3554
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2020 3:19 pm

Lemoentjie wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:48 pm
Uncle fester wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:29 pm From the outside looking in, could another leader have gone full Ian Smith and let it go as far as bloodshed to hold onto minority rule?
Yes, and unlike in Rhodesia, they probably would have won the war.
Who? The SADF? Lol. They ultimately would have bled to death. The support from Israel, the UK and USA would have evaporated as soon as the optics of white soldiers killing black people escalated. Rhodesia has support from us and Britain. No way the apartheid govt could fight and survive a war once the under the table sanction busting dried up.
User avatar
handyman
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:23 pm

Looking forward to Ox's contribution to this here fred.
Springboks, Stormers and WP supporter.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 11911
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

handyman wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:13 pm Looking forward to Ox's contribution to this here fred.
Something Transvaal, those Cape fools, not Natal, something, something.
User avatar
Blake
Posts: 2682
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:28 pm
Location: Republic of Western Cape

FalseBayFC wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:12 pm
Lemoentjie wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:48 pm
Uncle fester wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:29 pm From the outside looking in, could another leader have gone full Ian Smith and let it go as far as bloodshed to hold onto minority rule?
Yes, and unlike in Rhodesia, they probably would have won the war.
Who? The SADF? Lol. They ultimately would have bled to death. The support from Israel, the UK and USA would have evaporated as soon as the optics of white soldiers killing black people escalated. Rhodesia has support from us and Britain. No way the apartheid govt could fight and survive a war once the under the table sanction busting dried up.
Pretty much this. Urban civil war in your own neighbourhood is a different prospect of a bush war against an external enemy on foreign soil.

I’m sure government and the SANDF had battle plans and contingencies for such an eventuality, but at some point they would have been bled dry of funds, resources and bodies to throw into the meat grinder.
User avatar
assfly
Posts: 4652
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 6:30 am

Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:10 pm AIUI Smith had the situation broadly under control until Salazar fell no? And by then the die was already cast.
I don't think it was every truly under control. Although white Rhodesians appeared to have thrived in the conditions from 1965 onwards, with their unique siege mentality, even then they must have seen what was going on around them.

But yes, 1974 things definitely changed with the front in Mozambique opening up. When John Vorster resigned in 1978 Rhodesia lost its last ally.
User avatar
Hugo
Posts: 1544
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:27 pm

Strikes me that he occupies a similar place in history to Gorbachev in that he brought about an end to a dying, unsustainable system with relatively minor bloodshed.

I think these types of leaders never quite get the credit that they deserve because people tend to take for granted that what happened under their watch was inevitable.
User avatar
Blake
Posts: 2682
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:28 pm
Location: Republic of Western Cape

Hugo wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 3:11 pm Strikes me that he occupies a similar place in history to Gorbachev in that he brought about an end to a dying, unsustainable system with relatively minor bloodshed.

I think these types of leaders never quite get the credit that they deserve because people tend to take for granted that what happened under their watch was inevitable.
You are probably right and I think if it had ended there and he retired quietly into public life, that is maybe what he would have been remembered for.

But like all egotistical politicians he had to start of the FW de Klerk Foundation as a vehicle to obtain some social relevance and make some questionable comments about the pre- and post apartheid society.

Even before the era of internet cancel culture, these raised a ton of eyebrows and tarnished whatever legacy he had at the time.
Lemoentjie
Posts: 642
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am

FalseBayFC wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:12 pm
Lemoentjie wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:48 pm
Uncle fester wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:29 pm From the outside looking in, could another leader have gone full Ian Smith and let it go as far as bloodshed to hold onto minority rule?
Yes, and unlike in Rhodesia, they probably would have won the war.
Who? The SADF? Lol. They ultimately would have bled to death. The support from Israel, the UK and USA would have evaporated as soon as the optics of white soldiers killing black people escalated. Rhodesia has support from us and Britain. No way the apartheid govt could fight and survive a war once the under the table sanction busting dried up.
Ja the SADF.

It depends on your timeframe. I think it could have continued well into the late 2000s, even with heavy sanctions. SA was very self-sufficient.
Post Reply