
FW de Klerk gooooooooooooooooooooooornneeee
-
- Posts: 845
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:08 am
Gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooorne


Last edited by Big Nipper on Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 845
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:08 am
Fixxxed, slip of the finger
The excitement getting to you?

-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am
Bit classless to celebrate someone's death like that.
All I'll say is that he is certainly one of the biggest figures in South Africa's history as a state.
All I'll say is that he is certainly one of the biggest figures in South Africa's history as a state.
-
- Posts: 845
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:08 am
The only thing that is classless is somehow making your way to the top leadership of the National PartyLemoentjie wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:38 am Bit classless to celebrate someone's death like that.
All I'll say is that he is certainly one of the biggest figures in South Africa's history as a state.
Forgive my ignorance, but the above doesn’t sound like a terrible contribution to South Africa.
F.W. de Klerk, in full Frederik Willem de Klerk, (born March 18, 1936, Johannesburg, South Africa), politician who as president of South Africa (1989–94) brought the apartheid system of racial segregation to an end and negotiated a transition to majority rule in his country. He and Nelson Mandela jointly received the 1993 Nobel Prize for Peace for their collaboration in efforts to establish nonracial democracy in South Africa.
But I know very little on it.
I think some will tell you he made that happen and others will say he was dragged kicking and screaming to it and for political expediencyYmx wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:52 amForgive my ignorance, but the above doesn’t sound like a terrible contribution to South Africa.
F.W. de Klerk, in full Frederik Willem de Klerk, (born March 18, 1936, Johannesburg, South Africa), politician who as president of South Africa (1989–94) brought the apartheid system of racial segregation to an end and negotiated a transition to majority rule in his country. He and Nelson Mandela jointly received the 1993 Nobel Prize for Peace for their collaboration in efforts to establish nonracial democracy in South Africa.
But I know very little on it.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 845
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:08 am
If you believe FW brought Apartheid to an end due to his commitment to racial equality you must be smoking some strong stuff. He had no choice, the country was circling the drain due to his Apartheid cabalYmx wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:52 amForgive my ignorance, but the above doesn’t sound like a terrible contribution to South Africa.
F.W. de Klerk, in full Frederik Willem de Klerk, (born March 18, 1936, Johannesburg, South Africa), politician who as president of South Africa (1989–94) brought the apartheid system of racial segregation to an end and negotiated a transition to majority rule in his country. He and Nelson Mandela jointly received the 1993 Nobel Prize for Peace for their collaboration in efforts to establish nonracial democracy in South Africa.
But I know very little on it.
Very true Nips, but keep it classy.Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:01 amIf you believe FW brought Apartheid to an end due to his commitment to racial equality you must be smoking some strong stuff. He had no choice, the country was circling the drain due to his Apartheid cabalYmx wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:52 amForgive my ignorance, but the above doesn’t sound like a terrible contribution to South Africa.
F.W. de Klerk, in full Frederik Willem de Klerk, (born March 18, 1936, Johannesburg, South Africa), politician who as president of South Africa (1989–94) brought the apartheid system of racial segregation to an end and negotiated a transition to majority rule in his country. He and Nelson Mandela jointly received the 1993 Nobel Prize for Peace for their collaboration in efforts to establish nonracial democracy in South Africa.
But I know very little on it.
De Klerk was the right man at the right time leading the NP and for that South Africans should be grateful. He wasn't perfect, but at least he saw the light early and reacted in the right way.Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:01 amIf you believe FW brought Apartheid to an end due to his commitment to racial equality you must be smoking some strong stuff. He had no choice, the country was circling the drain due to his Apartheid cabalYmx wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:52 amForgive my ignorance, but the above doesn’t sound like a terrible contribution to South Africa.
F.W. de Klerk, in full Frederik Willem de Klerk, (born March 18, 1936, Johannesburg, South Africa), politician who as president of South Africa (1989–94) brought the apartheid system of racial segregation to an end and negotiated a transition to majority rule in his country. He and Nelson Mandela jointly received the 1993 Nobel Prize for Peace for their collaboration in efforts to establish nonracial democracy in South Africa.
But I know very little on it.
Some of the dinosaurs before him made Mugabe look reasonable and compassionate.
-
- Posts: 845
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:08 am
He really tarnished any shred of goodwill he had last year when his foundation argued Apartheid was not a crime against humanity.
- average joe
- Posts: 1895
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 5:46 am
- Location: kuvukiland
Recon there's not many people who liked the guy.
-
- Posts: 845
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:08 am
Agreed. Far right white nutjobs think he is a traitor, and the rest know him as an Apartheid stalwart
Very, very true.Sandstorm wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:14 amDe Klerk was the right man at the right time leading the NP and for that South Africans should be grateful. He wasn't perfect, but at least he saw the light early and reacted in the right way.Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:01 amIf you believe FW brought Apartheid to an end due to his commitment to racial equality you must be smoking some strong stuff. He had no choice, the country was circling the drain due to his Apartheid cabalYmx wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:52 am
Forgive my ignorance, but the above doesn’t sound like a terrible contribution to South Africa.
But I know very little on it.
Some of the dinosaurs before him made Mugabe look reasonable and compassionate.
Not their finest hour.Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:16 am He really tarnished any shred of goodwill he had last year when his foundation argued Apartheid was not a crime against humanity.
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 16059
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
That drain is full of kak since FWs days.Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:01 amIf you believe FW brought Apartheid to an end due to his commitment to racial equality you must be smoking some strong stuff. He had no choice, the country was circling the drain due to his Apartheid cabalYmx wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:52 amForgive my ignorance, but the above doesn’t sound like a terrible contribution to South Africa.
F.W. de Klerk, in full Frederik Willem de Klerk, (born March 18, 1936, Johannesburg, South Africa), politician who as president of South Africa (1989–94) brought the apartheid system of racial segregation to an end and negotiated a transition to majority rule in his country. He and Nelson Mandela jointly received the 1993 Nobel Prize for Peace for their collaboration in efforts to establish nonracial democracy in South Africa.
But I know very little on it.
Basically the ANC and their acolytes hate to share the credit for ending apartheid so they've done their best to rewrite history by saying fw de klerk had no choice and also to ignore the contribution of the many other anti apartheid organisations that existed at the time. Not unlike the CCP pretending that it was solely them who liberated China from the Japanese. FW is also hated by many on the right (not only Saffas ) for "betraying" white south AfricansSlick wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:01 amI think some will tell you he made that happen and others will say he was dragged kicking and screaming to it and for political expediencyYmx wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:52 amForgive my ignorance, but the above doesn’t sound like a terrible contribution to South Africa.
F.W. de Klerk, in full Frederik Willem de Klerk, (born March 18, 1936, Johannesburg, South Africa), politician who as president of South Africa (1989–94) brought the apartheid system of racial segregation to an end and negotiated a transition to majority rule in his country. He and Nelson Mandela jointly received the 1993 Nobel Prize for Peace for their collaboration in efforts to establish nonracial democracy in South Africa.
But I know very little on it.
I met him during the interval of a Bryn terfel concert in cape town, he was extremely good natured and loved talking politics.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
This thread has wonderful car-crash potential. Staying the hell away 

“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
spoilsport!Insane_Homer wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:31 am This thread has wonderful car-crash potential. Staying the hell away![]()
I don’t think anything, as I said I know little. I was just asking after I looked him up and that was straight from wiki.Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:01 amIf you believe FW brought Apartheid to an end due to his commitment to racial equality you must be smoking some strong stuff. He had no choice, the country was circling the drain due to his Apartheid cabalYmx wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:52 amForgive my ignorance, but the above doesn’t sound like a terrible contribution to South Africa.
F.W. de Klerk, in full Frederik Willem de Klerk, (born March 18, 1936, Johannesburg, South Africa), politician who as president of South Africa (1989–94) brought the apartheid system of racial segregation to an end and negotiated a transition to majority rule in his country. He and Nelson Mandela jointly received the 1993 Nobel Prize for Peace for their collaboration in efforts to establish nonracial democracy in South Africa.
But I know very little on it.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12063
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Quite. Didn't he gain a Nobel Peace Prize?assfly wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 10:49 am He's a complicated figure, which I'm sure the response to his death will demonstrate.

The bar is very low, granted, but had he been a hardliner like many others in his midst, things could have gotten very ugly very fast.Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:25 amAgreed. Far right white nutjobs think he is a traitor, and the rest know him as an Apartheid stalwart
He is being put on a pedestal for having done the bare minimum sure, but at the end of the day I'm glad it was him at the helm and not one of the other NP nutjobs that he was fighting against within his own party.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 5061
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
From the outside looking in, could another leader have gone full Ian Smith and let it go as far as bloodshed to hold onto minority rule?Blake wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 12:56 pmThe bar is very low, granted, but had he been a hardliner like many others in his midst, things could have gotten very ugly very fast.Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:25 amAgreed. Far right white nutjobs think he is a traitor, and the rest know him as an Apartheid stalwart
He is being put on a pedestal for having done the bare minimum sure, but at the end of the day I'm glad it was him at the helm and not one of the other NP nutjobs that he was fighting against within his own party.
Yes, it was a joint award with Madiba. Controversial, but recognition for his participation in the downfall of Apartheid.
Yes, easilyUncle fester wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:29 pmFrom the outside looking in, could another leader have gone full Ian Smith and let it go as far as bloodshed to hold onto minority rule?Blake wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 12:56 pmThe bar is very low, granted, but had he been a hardliner like many others in his midst, things could have gotten very ugly very fast.Big Nipper wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:25 am
Agreed. Far right white nutjobs think he is a traitor, and the rest know him as an Apartheid stalwart
He is being put on a pedestal for having done the bare minimum sure, but at the end of the day I'm glad it was him at the helm and not one of the other NP nutjobs that he was fighting against within his own party.
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am
Yes, and unlike in Rhodesia, they probably would have won the war.Uncle fester wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:29 pm From the outside looking in, could another leader have gone full Ian Smith and let it go as far as bloodshed to hold onto minority rule?
This is an interesting comparison, and one that I think of quite a lot. Smith is still spoken about like a saviour to white Rhodesians, but all he did in my opinion was delay the inevitable and lead thousands of young men to their deaths. If power had been handed over in the mid 1960s like all the other colonies, Zimbabwe could be in such a different place now.Uncle fester wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:29 pm From the outside looking in, could another leader have gone full Ian Smith and let it go as far as bloodshed to hold onto minority rule?
The fact that Mandela and de Klerk managed to avoid a civil war is something to behold.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6735
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
AIUI Smith had the situation broadly under control until Salazar fell no? And by then the die was already cast.assfly wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:58 pmThis is an interesting comparison, and one that I think of quite a lot. Smith is still spoken about like a saviour to white Rhodesians, but all he did in my opinion was delay the inevitable and lead thousands of young men to their deaths. If power had been handed over in the mid 1960s like all the other colonies, Zimbabwe could be in such a different place now.Uncle fester wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:29 pm From the outside looking in, could another leader have gone full Ian Smith and let it go as far as bloodshed to hold onto minority rule?
The fact that Mandela and de Klerk managed to avoid a civil war is something to behold.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- FalseBayFC
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2020 3:19 pm
Who? The SADF? Lol. They ultimately would have bled to death. The support from Israel, the UK and USA would have evaporated as soon as the optics of white soldiers killing black people escalated. Rhodesia has support from us and Britain. No way the apartheid govt could fight and survive a war once the under the table sanction busting dried up.Lemoentjie wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:48 pmYes, and unlike in Rhodesia, they probably would have won the war.Uncle fester wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:29 pm From the outside looking in, could another leader have gone full Ian Smith and let it go as far as bloodshed to hold onto minority rule?
Pretty much this. Urban civil war in your own neighbourhood is a different prospect of a bush war against an external enemy on foreign soil.FalseBayFC wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:12 pmWho? The SADF? Lol. They ultimately would have bled to death. The support from Israel, the UK and USA would have evaporated as soon as the optics of white soldiers killing black people escalated. Rhodesia has support from us and Britain. No way the apartheid govt could fight and survive a war once the under the table sanction busting dried up.Lemoentjie wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:48 pmYes, and unlike in Rhodesia, they probably would have won the war.Uncle fester wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:29 pm From the outside looking in, could another leader have gone full Ian Smith and let it go as far as bloodshed to hold onto minority rule?
I’m sure government and the SANDF had battle plans and contingencies for such an eventuality, but at some point they would have been bled dry of funds, resources and bodies to throw into the meat grinder.
I don't think it was every truly under control. Although white Rhodesians appeared to have thrived in the conditions from 1965 onwards, with their unique siege mentality, even then they must have seen what was going on around them.Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:10 pm AIUI Smith had the situation broadly under control until Salazar fell no? And by then the die was already cast.
But yes, 1974 things definitely changed with the front in Mozambique opening up. When John Vorster resigned in 1978 Rhodesia lost its last ally.
Strikes me that he occupies a similar place in history to Gorbachev in that he brought about an end to a dying, unsustainable system with relatively minor bloodshed.
I think these types of leaders never quite get the credit that they deserve because people tend to take for granted that what happened under their watch was inevitable.
I think these types of leaders never quite get the credit that they deserve because people tend to take for granted that what happened under their watch was inevitable.
You are probably right and I think if it had ended there and he retired quietly into public life, that is maybe what he would have been remembered for.Hugo wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 3:11 pm Strikes me that he occupies a similar place in history to Gorbachev in that he brought about an end to a dying, unsustainable system with relatively minor bloodshed.
I think these types of leaders never quite get the credit that they deserve because people tend to take for granted that what happened under their watch was inevitable.
But like all egotistical politicians he had to start of the FW de Klerk Foundation as a vehicle to obtain some social relevance and make some questionable comments about the pre- and post apartheid society.
Even before the era of internet cancel culture, these raised a ton of eyebrows and tarnished whatever legacy he had at the time.
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am
Ja the SADF.FalseBayFC wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:12 pmWho? The SADF? Lol. They ultimately would have bled to death. The support from Israel, the UK and USA would have evaporated as soon as the optics of white soldiers killing black people escalated. Rhodesia has support from us and Britain. No way the apartheid govt could fight and survive a war once the under the table sanction busting dried up.Lemoentjie wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:48 pmYes, and unlike in Rhodesia, they probably would have won the war.Uncle fester wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:29 pm From the outside looking in, could another leader have gone full Ian Smith and let it go as far as bloodshed to hold onto minority rule?
It depends on your timeframe. I think it could have continued well into the late 2000s, even with heavy sanctions. SA was very self-sufficient.