It might be in total though the tested positive is likely to be near 40,000. The fear being propagated now is disproportionate to the risk. This dishonesty is unfair on the population who by and large have been sensible despite sensationalist reporting and silly politicians and not really needed the threats as much as it has been used.Blackmac wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 9:51 am I see Javid's claim of 200000 cases on Monday is being ridiculed. Likely to be more like 40000.
As I've said I understand the need for caution but object to the complete bullshit and dishonesty.
So, coronavirus...
Statement given by the First Minister Nicola Sturgeon to the Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh on 14 December 2021.
https://www.gov.scot/publications/coron ... mber-2021/
it contains the following;
https://www.gov.scot/publications/coron ... mber-2021/
it contains the following;
In recent months, the proportion of Delta cases needing hospital care has been around 2%.
Yeah, apologies my mistake.Tichtheid wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 10:45 am Statement given by the First Minister Nicola Sturgeon to the Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh on 14 December 2021.
https://www.gov.scot/publications/coron ... mber-2021/
it contains the following;
In recent months, the proportion of Delta cases needing hospital care has been around 2%.
Blackmac wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 10:49 amYeah, apologies my mistake.Tichtheid wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 10:45 am Statement given by the First Minister Nicola Sturgeon to the Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh on 14 December 2021.
https://www.gov.scot/publications/coron ... mber-2021/
it contains the following;
In recent months, the proportion of Delta cases needing hospital care has been around 2%.
There is a 4% figure, but it's in relation to testing
For about 95% of all cases in Scotland, tests are currently processed in a way that allows us to know if the S gene is present or not.
This shows that Omicron cases are increasing exponentially - faster than any variant that has gone before.
When I made a statement to Parliament last week, around 4% of cases showed the S Gene drop out. By Wednesday it was 7%, on Friday it was above 15%.
Today, it is 27.5%
We estimate that the doubling time is two to three days - more rapid than anything experienced in the pandemic so far.
There are so many figures to keep up with in this.
I think that is the problem. I'm no scientist but also not exactly stupid and despite some best efforts on here I struggle to understand the difference in S gene dropout detection and the daily positive cases. If it takes say a couple of days to carry out the full sequencing examination, yesterdays figures were potentially 27.4% of 3117 then surely in a couple of days, on completion of full sequencing of todays tests we will see a jump to around 850ish??Tichtheid wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 10:52 amBlackmac wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 10:49 amYeah, apologies my mistake.Tichtheid wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 10:45 am Statement given by the First Minister Nicola Sturgeon to the Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh on 14 December 2021.
https://www.gov.scot/publications/coron ... mber-2021/
it contains the following;
There is a 4% figure, but it's in relation to testing
For about 95% of all cases in Scotland, tests are currently processed in a way that allows us to know if the S gene is present or not.
This shows that Omicron cases are increasing exponentially - faster than any variant that has gone before.
When I made a statement to Parliament last week, around 4% of cases showed the S Gene drop out. By Wednesday it was 7%, on Friday it was above 15%.
Today, it is 27.5%
We estimate that the doubling time is two to three days - more rapid than anything experienced in the pandemic so far.
There are so many figures to keep up with in this.
That's why I asked are the full positive results lagging a day or two behind,
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4920
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Mike Ryan from WHO has said we won't beat Covid with lockdown or vaccination alone. It needs to be a range of measures to slow it down and social distancing has to be one of those.Biffer wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 7:43 amCan you explain why they want discourage socialising during the festive season?Blackmac wrote: Tue Dec 14, 2021 10:10 pmI'm not a conspiracy theorist and given the fact I have spent my whole life in public service I always presume that governments are trying to do right by the population. Whilst I don't think they are looking to do any harm I certainly think that they have seized on the opportunity of Omicron to impose their will without having to legislate too much. Sadly I also think both the current Scottish and Westminster governments are rotten to the core and completely untrustworthy.Dogbert wrote: Tue Dec 14, 2021 9:35 pm
I'm no medical expert , but my understanding is this - The S gene drop out is a marker for the presence of the Omnicron variant , but not definite proof - The definite proof can only be confirmed by a genome scan
The S gene dropout test is a useful surrogate and a quick fix. Other variants and mutations can also cause a dropout. I suspect that they will only confirm a Positive for Omnicron with a full Genome sequence
So its a bit more complicated than "either positive Omicron cases or not"
If any of the above is incorrect - then maybe another poster who has more experience can confirm / clarify
The best information that all the governments / devolved administrations in the UK is that this variant is much more infectious and will shortly become dominant , with the potential for large numbers of Hospitalisations
Do you believe that all the administrations are 'scaremongering' ( or just the Scottish one )
I'll admit I do not understand the science behind the testing situation but if they are only able to confirm 10% of the potential Omicron cases on a daily basis we either have a significant public health failing or as I sadly believe, they are deliberately overstating the problem to frighten the populace into compliance. PHE are claiming over 200000 cases with only 4000 confirmed.
If the testing is lagging so far behind are we soon to see the massive increase in cases they are predicting.
Blackmac,
You aren't going to sequence the lot. You will randomly sample a smaller but statistically significant number of them.
You can can also infer a growth rate for omicron and extrapolate it but probably only for few days or week before it becomes too uncertain.
You aren't going to sequence the lot. You will randomly sample a smaller but statistically significant number of them.
You can can also infer a growth rate for omicron and extrapolate it but probably only for few days or week before it becomes too uncertain.
Yeah, I should not have said most people. My point was it was a pretty unprecedented situation, there were conflicting scientific advice, I mean the UK's chief medical officer who is an epidemiologist told the public in March 2020 not to wear masks and not to change their daily routine. While the political decisions had to be informed by the science, other factors also had to be considered, so I cut the politicians some slack in those first few months .JM2K6 wrote: Tue Dec 14, 2021 5:29 pmI don't understand that final paragraph. Are you holding governments to the same standard as a layman with no specialist knowledge or access to scientific data?Calculon wrote: Tue Dec 14, 2021 5:19 pmI don't really understand this term "precautionary principle". What exactly does it mean, just a fancy way of saying "better safe than sorry"? It seems a phrase that can be used to justify whatever precautions (restrictions) are deemed necessary, whatever the actual nature of the resistrictions, and without then having to lay out a clear cost/ bennefit rationale of said restrictions. Which admittedly can be very hard to do consideing the somewhat unpredictable nature of this pandemic.Biffer wrote: Tue Dec 14, 2021 1:31 pm
There's also a case, not for fearmongering, but emphasising worst cases that is scientific. Using the precautionary principle is important when you've only got one of something, like a global environment or a global population. If we'd applied it more in earlier waves in the UK, there might not be as many dead.
The UK along with most countries made loads of mistakes in the beginning. Most people , including myself, completely underestimated the impact the virus would have. So I can't be too critical of decisions taken in the first few months. Even those taken by shitty politicians.
I'm not quite a layperson in epidemiology or virology, most scientific data is published, and my predictions were wrong.
I know. What I'm trying to understand from Blackmac is what he's on about. He acknowledges that we should decrease our socialising in order to prevent the virus spreading but goes off on a rant when the SNP try to get people to do it. It's not clear where the line is for him other than if the SNP are saying it it has to be shouted down.Uncle fester wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 11:21 amMike Ryan from WHO has said we won't beat Covid with lockdown or vaccination alone. It needs to be a range of measures to slow it down and social distancing has to be one of those.Biffer wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 7:43 amCan you explain why they want discourage socialising during the festive season?Blackmac wrote: Tue Dec 14, 2021 10:10 pm
I'm not a conspiracy theorist and given the fact I have spent my whole life in public service I always presume that governments are trying to do right by the population. Whilst I don't think they are looking to do any harm I certainly think that they have seized on the opportunity of Omicron to impose their will without having to legislate too much. Sadly I also think both the current Scottish and Westminster governments are rotten to the core and completely untrustworthy.
I'll admit I do not understand the science behind the testing situation but if they are only able to confirm 10% of the potential Omicron cases on a daily basis we either have a significant public health failing or as I sadly believe, they are deliberately overstating the problem to frighten the populace into compliance. PHE are claiming over 200000 cases with only 4000 confirmed.
If the testing is lagging so far behind are we soon to see the massive increase in cases they are predicting.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 796
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm
They tried to get away with this in march 2020. Around the 7th march boris gave a speech effectively saying "we're not shutting pubs, but don't go to pubs" the week running up to the 19th they were eerily quiet and it was only when the numbers went through the roof that they felt they had to order them shutBlackmac wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 8:35 amThat is essentially my theory. If they had legislated to shut down hospitality they would have had to put a huge financial support structure in place. Panic the public into doing it for you and you are off the hook.Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 8:11 am Did an annual Christmas pub crawl last night, albeit depleted from those who came back positive on LFTs. In at least three Central London pubs in the run up to Christmas we were the only customers, only one (a spoons) was anything like busy. We've locked down by stealth with no support for hospitality businesses. Heart goes out to them - would usually be standing room at the bar in most of them.
No, nothing to do with the SNP specifically. It's the way all the governments are going about it. The rhetoric they are using, tsunamis etc and the blatant exaggeration of the current situation is clearly designed to create a greater impression of the risk than they currently understand. As others have said, it is lockdown by the back door without the governments having to wear the financial consequences.Biffer wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 1:26 pmI know. What I'm trying to understand from Blackmac is what he's on about. He acknowledges that we should decrease our socialising in order to prevent the virus spreading but goes off on a rant when the SNP try to get people to do it. It's not clear where the line is for him other than if the SNP are saying it it has to be shouted down.Uncle fester wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 11:21 amMike Ryan from WHO has said we won't beat Covid with lockdown or vaccination alone. It needs to be a range of measures to slow it down and social distancing has to be one of those.Biffer wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 7:43 am
Can you explain why they want discourage socialising during the festive season?
I know what you mean with the overstating of risk. The uncertainty overall is far lower than it was in March 2020 and the risk is lower as well. People need to accept they are going to get this multiple times in their life.Blackmac wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 3:00 pmNo, nothing to do with the SNP specifically. It's the way all the governments are going about it. The rhetoric they are using, tsunamis etc and the blatant exaggeration of the current situation is clearly designed to create a greater impression of the risk than they currently understand. As others have said, it is lockdown by the back door without the governments having to wear the financial consequences.Biffer wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 1:26 pmI know. What I'm trying to understand from Blackmac is what he's on about. He acknowledges that we should decrease our socialising in order to prevent the virus spreading but goes off on a rant when the SNP try to get people to do it. It's not clear where the line is for him other than if the SNP are saying it it has to be shouted down.Uncle fester wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 11:21 am
Mike Ryan from WHO has said we won't beat Covid with lockdown or vaccination alone. It needs to be a range of measures to slow it down and social distancing has to be one of those.
A bit of research today showed that omicron is 70x better at replicating in nose and throat cells than delta but 10x worse at replicating in lung cells.
Thanks, that would support the difference in symptoms we are seeing between the two strains.
Moderna?Slick wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 6:00 pm My wife’s place has had every single booking for tonight and tomorrow night cancel
In other news, feel totally shite after the booster yesterday
And the speed of spread.Calculon wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 5:58 pmThanks, that would support the difference in symptoms we are seeing between the two strains.
Moderna booster yesterday, sore arm but fine apart from that.Slick wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 6:00 pm My wife’s place has had every single booking for tonight and tomorrow night cancel
In other news, feel totally shite after the booster yesterday
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Slick wrote: Mon Dec 06, 2021 10:07 pmYeehaa! Sounds like you are a bit of a fanny, but glad you’re feeling betterSandstorm wrote: Mon Dec 06, 2021 9:04 pm Well that escalated fast!! Jabbed 3pm Saturday, just a sore arm on Sunday until 9pm when I started shivering and sweating uncontrollably. Went to bed and was ready to die all night. Drenched the sheets in sweat, awful headache. Almost cracked my teeth they were chattering so much!! Sent a sick note text to boss at breakfast time.
Finally passed out asleep and woke up at 2pm this afternoon. Felt much better at last and the arm barely aches any more.
Fuck Moderna boosters and fuck Covid19.![]()
I’m not sure you’ll get much sympathy from Sandy on this one.Slick wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 6:00 pm My wife’s place has had every single booking for tonight and tomorrow night cancel
In other news, feel totally shite after the booster yesterday
Nah, I know how shite he feels. It ain’t fun.Ymx wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 8:44 pmSlick wrote: Mon Dec 06, 2021 10:07 pmYeehaa! Sounds like you are a bit of a fanny, but glad you’re feeling betterSandstorm wrote: Mon Dec 06, 2021 9:04 pm Well that escalated fast!! Jabbed 3pm Saturday, just a sore arm on Sunday until 9pm when I started shivering and sweating uncontrollably. Went to bed and was ready to die all night. Drenched the sheets in sweat, awful headache. Almost cracked my teeth they were chattering so much!! Sent a sick note text to boss at breakfast time.
Finally passed out asleep and woke up at 2pm this afternoon. Felt much better at last and the arm barely aches any more.
Fuck Moderna boosters and fuck Covid19.
I’m not sure you’ll get much sympathy from Sandy on this one.Slick wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 6:00 pm My wife’s place has had every single booking for tonight and tomorrow night cancel
In other news, feel totally shite after the booster yesterday
I'm sprightly today!
Doesn't it just mean I have an immense and extremely manly immune system?
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Think it means your default setting on infection is manfluSlick wrote: Thu Dec 16, 2021 10:23 amI'm sprightly today!
Doesn't it just mean I have an immense and extremely manly immune system?
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
foshure, let's hope it completely replaces the delta variantpetej wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 6:20 pmModerna?Slick wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 6:00 pm My wife’s place has had every single booking for tonight and tomorrow night cancel
In other news, feel totally shite after the booster yesterday
And the speed of spread.Calculon wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 5:58 pmThanks, that would support the difference in symptoms we are seeing between the two strains.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11945
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Are we assuming that the vaccine program was pointless then? I know that's sounding facetious, but who gives a flying f**k about infection rates if the vaccines are effective?tc27 wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 4:33 pm Well..lets hope Omicron is mild in most people because in cases numbers looks like we are going to set some new records:
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2801
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
No
Infection rates matter if they end up being double what was observed during the last winter peak. There will be a follow on impact on hospital admissions etc.
Without vaccinations we would be in huge trouble
Infection rates matter if they end up being double what was observed during the last winter peak. There will be a follow on impact on hospital admissions etc.
Without vaccinations we would be in huge trouble
That would be good. Hopefully, post this wave we can start to get rid of PCR testing outside of clinical settings, the shitty contact tracing, travel restrictions, quarantine of contacts. Going to be difficult for some of the UK public to shift attitudes on COVID even as the level of risk declines as it has become part of people's tribal identities.Calculon wrote: Thu Dec 16, 2021 11:05 amfoshure, let's hope it completely replaces the delta variantpetej wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 6:20 pmModerna?Slick wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 6:00 pm My wife’s place has had every single booking for tonight and tomorrow night cancel
In other news, feel totally shite after the booster yesterday
And the speed of spread.Calculon wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 5:58 pm
Thanks, that would support the difference in symptoms we are seeing between the two strains.
Covid didn't start with Omicron, and the vaccines are still providing us with a real defence against Omicron. It'd be carnage without them. Vaccines are effective but don't stop transmission of Omicron and aren't 100% effective.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Dec 16, 2021 12:52 pmAre we assuming that the vaccine program was pointless then? I know that's sounding facetious, but who gives a flying f**k about infection rates if the vaccines are effective?
No...without vaccines this would be an absolute catastrophe.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Dec 16, 2021 12:52 pmAre we assuming that the vaccine program was pointless then? I know that's sounding facetious, but who gives a flying f**k about infection rates if the vaccines are effective?tc27 wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 4:33 pm Well..lets hope Omicron is mild in most people because in cases numbers looks like we are going to set some new records:
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4920
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
If that is the case, it could be very good news. One of the reasons Covid has been so serious is that it infects both upper and lower respiratory tracts. Other similar viruses like MERS were lower respiratory only.
As as general rule of thumb, lower respiratory only is more dangerous but much slower to spread. Upper respiratory only is very quick to spread but not as serious. Covid had the perfect storm combination of both.
Now if Omicron eases us away from lower respiratory infections, that will eliminate most of the risk. We've effectively used natural selection to force it to become less dangerous.
Still need to be a bit careful that we don't throw caution to the wind and let it mutate back into something more dangerous.
Think I read somewhere it has a 23% less likelihood of people ending up in hospital than delta. Which actually isn’t that much.
But then the likelihood of ending up in ICU is drastically reduced. From the numbers I saw it was 5.7 times less likely for an omicron case to end up in ICU than for a delta case.

But then the likelihood of ending up in ICU is drastically reduced. From the numbers I saw it was 5.7 times less likely for an omicron case to end up in ICU than for a delta case.

Last edited by Ymx on Thu Dec 16, 2021 10:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.