What's going on in Ukraine?

Where goats go to escape
Flockwitt
Posts: 1037
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2020 9:58 am

fishfoodie wrote: Thu Jun 23, 2022 11:09 pm
Hellraiser wrote: Thu Jun 23, 2022 10:23 pm
Flockwitt wrote: Thu Jun 23, 2022 8:45 pm I wonder where Ukraine will have a go at first once they get the opportunity. I would suggest Kherson front. Difficult for Russia to move additional troops there and less chance of things to go badly wrong. A threat to Crimea will force Putin's hand in the east. The Russians definitely want to keep it.
I think Kherson is definitely the priority. The Ukrainians have gone dark on the South but have little issue with admitting withdrawals in Donbas. I reckon the PzH 2000s and HIMARS are going straight to Kherson. There's been so many troop withdrawals from Melitopol and even Mariupol that a solid strike from the West and Zaporizhzhia could see the Russians break and rout provided the Ukrainians have enough heavy equipment to push through.
It might be, but it'd be playing the Russians game if they let themselves get drawn into the WW I type slog they want, where they can just reinforce the static battle lines & used the separatists as cannon fodder.

Instead, I think they should do the exact opposite, & force the Russians to maneuver & defend all across that enormous front; & that will force Putin to do what he doesn't want to do .. commit Russian forces.

Eventually they'll force the Russians to move out of their positions down in the South, & that'll be the opportunity to strike in at Kherson.
Actually to an extent that's already happened. Russia has had to commit so many troops to taking the Donbas region by stripping out from other areas they are vulnerable. The problem is Ukraine doesn't have enough in reserve yet to be able to bring overwhelming force to any one location and start destroying the Russian army in the field. There are a couple of locations Russian units are at risk, north Kherson, Izyum and so forth. I see the Ukrainians have got a new unit assaulting the south west of Kherson. I think in the short term that's best they can do, probe away for weak points, up the ante in the attrition stakes for the Russians, and eventually force a local collapse.

Not seeing much in the mobilisation rumours above for South and Western military districts. Those are either ethnic Russians or areas that have taken major losses already. With nothing to arm them with turning a mobilization into quick cannon fodder will have internal consequences you'd have to imagine. Or perhaps produce a crisis with people refusing to go.
User avatar
Hellraiser
Posts: 2272
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

I think we'll start seeing a shift in Ukrainian tactics in the next few weeks, and in fairness it's already started. The initial months of the war saw an emphasis on destroying Russian armour and vehicles, this then switched to infantry elimination and now I think with Western heavy artillery, and in particular the HIMARS, M270s, PzH 2000s, and CAESARS there will be a much larger emphasis on destroying Russian artillery pieces and ammo depots out of of range of counter-battery fire.
Image

Ceterum censeo delendam esse Muscovia
Flockwitt
Posts: 1037
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2020 9:58 am

Agreed. Once the balance of firepower is tilted in the Ukrainian favour then they can consider offensive operations properly. Until then they run the risk of what happened when they pushed down to the dam just north of Kherson. They were met with a wall of artillery fire and took significant losses for all their initial success. It'll be a different story with a month or so of constant counter battery work. The Russians have received a morale boost thinking artillery is going to do the job for them, it'll be a different story once the hitherto pretty much untouched towed tube units start degrading.
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6803
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街



User avatar
Hellraiser
Posts: 2272
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

I sincerely doubt that was a HIMARS strike. They wouldn't risk having them that close to the front line. I would guess it was a Tochka-U strike.
Image

Ceterum censeo delendam esse Muscovia
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6803
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

Hellraiser wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 9:18 am I sincerely doubt that was a HIMARS strike. They wouldn't risk having them that close to the front line. I would guess it was a Tochka-U strike.
Would have been a bold move, considering...
Flockwitt wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:36 am Seems strange that they publicise what they'll do before they do it.
Info was leaked by civilians on Social Media apparently, whether that was Pro Russian informers or just "careless talk"

User avatar
FalseBayFC
Posts: 3554
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2020 3:19 pm

Patriarch Kirill takes a spill. He's known to be a Putin stooge.

User avatar
FalseBayFC
Posts: 3554
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2020 3:19 pm

tabascoboy wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 9:25 am
[quote=Flockwitt post_id=215284 time=1656063389 user_id=601

This could easily become an iconic image of this war. Reminds me somehow of Dorothea Lange's Migrant Mother.
User avatar
Gumboot
Posts: 8711
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:17 am

FalseBayFC wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 11:28 am
tabascoboy wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 9:25 am
[quote=Flockwitt post_id=215284 time=1656063389 user_id=601

This could easily become an iconic image of this war. Reminds me somehow of Dorothea Lange's Migrant Mother.
Yep, could be any number of her dustbowl portraits. Desperate times.
User avatar
Blake
Posts: 2676
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:28 pm
Location: Republic of Western Cape

FalseBayFC wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 11:28 am
tabascoboy wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 9:25 am
[quote=Flockwitt post_id=215284 time=1656063389 user_id=601

This could easily become an iconic image of this war. Reminds me somehow of Dorothea Lange's Migrant Mother.
That photo will definitely be "up there" among the many others. There have been a couple that have been iconic as the stages of the war have progressed. These are two that I will always remember.

Drone photo of T-72 Turret in Ukrainian field:
Image

Azovstal Defenders:
Image
User avatar
FalseBayFC
Posts: 3554
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2020 3:19 pm

Gumboot wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 11:46 am
FalseBayFC wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 11:28 am
tabascoboy wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 9:25 am
[quote=Flockwitt post_id=215284 time=1656063389 user_id=601

This could easily become an iconic image of this war. Reminds me somehow of Dorothea Lange's Migrant Mother.
Yep, could be any number of her dustbowl portraits. Desperate times.
All in the eyes.
User avatar
Hellraiser
Posts: 2272
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

The launch site for the strike on Svatove was 100km south so it definitely wasn't HIMARS.
Image

Ceterum censeo delendam esse Muscovia
User avatar
laurent
Posts: 2276
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:36 am

Hellraiser wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 3:09 pm The launch site for the strike on Svatove was 100km south so it definitely wasn't HIMARS.
Toshka more likely

Looks like the Ukrainians have Either got a stash (been using quite a few) or reactivated stocks.

They did have a very competent Rocket industry (and Jet engines too).
Flockwitt
Posts: 1037
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2020 9:58 am

Jockaline
Posts: 244
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 6:23 pm
Location: Scotland

laurent wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 3:15 pm
Hellraiser wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 3:09 pm The launch site for the strike on Svatove was 100km south so it definitely wasn't HIMARS.
Toshka more likely

Looks like the Ukrainians have Either got a stash (been using quite a few) or reactivated stocks.

They did have a very competent Rocket industry (and Jet engines too).
Maybe they were holding them back for emergency use in really critical situations, but because of the weapons now coming from other countries they don't need to do that. Looking forward to news getting better in the days ahead.

Also want to add my appriection for all those that post in this thread, with special mention to Hellraiser, who has been outstanding.
User avatar
Hellraiser
Posts: 2272
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

laurent wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 3:15 pm
Hellraiser wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 3:09 pm The launch site for the strike on Svatove was 100km south so it definitely wasn't HIMARS.
Toshka more likely

Looks like the Ukrainians have Either got a stash (been using quite a few) or reactivated stocks.

They did have a very competent Rocket industry (and Jet engines too).
That's my belief too. I reckon they either have stock they've been holding back/reactivated, or they have undisclosed weapons manufactories still quietly producing munitions in western Ukraine. Possibly both.
Image

Ceterum censeo delendam esse Muscovia
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6803
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

Putin continues to play Lukashenko for the weak fool that he is. Lukashenko has Putin's arm so far up his arse he can probably taste it. He must love being a vassal, since Belarus is ever more clearly seen as being welcomed back officially as part of Russia before long. Suggestions being made that the supply of Iskanders is an exchange for munitions from Belarus to his own forces, and probably still hoping to use Belarus as more cannon fodder. Any pre-emptive attack by Ukraine against Belarus would just inflame the situation for themselves further, it must be hard to sit on their hands while Russia freely uses Belarus territory for rocket and missile launches.

Flockwitt
Posts: 1037
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2020 9:58 am

Was reading the Kyiv Independent on Belarus. It's now Russia's largest trade partner overtaking Germany with Russia promising more.

Heard elsewhere Russia is getting some tanks and APCs to help replace stuff from Belarus.

Birds of a feather.
User avatar
Hellraiser
Posts: 2272
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

Image

Ceterum censeo delendam esse Muscovia
User avatar
Hellraiser
Posts: 2272
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

tabascoboy wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 4:29 pm Putin continues to play Lukashenko for the weak fool that he is. Lukashenko has Putin's arm so far up his arse he can probably taste it. He must love being a vassal, since Belarus is ever more clearly seen as being welcomed back officially as part of Russia before long. Suggestions being made that the supply of Iskanders is an exchange for munitions from Belarus to his own forces, and probably still hoping to use Belarus as more cannon fodder. Any pre-emptive attack by Ukraine against Belarus would just inflame the situation for themselves further, it must be hard to sit on their hands while Russia freely uses Belarus territory for rocket and missile launches.

You misread the situation. Lukashenka's only aim, much like Boris, is to stay in power. The fact that he has managed to stay out of active involvement in the war to date is testament to just what a manipulative snake he is and having Putin's number down pat. He genuinely thought he might be Yeltsin's successor in a Russian-Belarusian confederal state in 1999 and has never really forgiven Putin for being "anointed".
Image

Ceterum censeo delendam esse Muscovia
User avatar
Hellraiser
Posts: 2272
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

Flockwitt wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 4:39 pm Was reading the Kyiv Independent on Belarus. It's now Russia's largest trade partner overtaking Germany with Russia promising more.

Heard elsewhere Russia is getting some tanks and APCs to help replace stuff from Belarus.

Birds of a feather.
Lukashenka basically buying off getting directly involved in Ukraine. There's been some video going around today and yesterday on Twitter and Telegram of 152mm munitions being taken out of storage in Belarus for shipment to Russia.
Image

Ceterum censeo delendam esse Muscovia
yermum
Posts: 560
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2020 3:15 pm

Hellraiser wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 6:46 pm
Flockwitt wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 4:39 pm Was reading the Kyiv Independent on Belarus. It's now Russia's largest trade partner overtaking Germany with Russia promising more.

Heard elsewhere Russia is getting some tanks and APCs to help replace stuff from Belarus.

Birds of a feather.
Lukashenka basically buying off getting directly involved in Ukraine. There's been some video going around today and yesterday on Twitter and Telegram of 152mm munitions being taken out of storage in Belarus for shipment to Russia.
But all the tankie concern trolls have been wanking off about how Russia has unlimited 152 ammo on reddit. Why would they need to take some from belorus?
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8729
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

The Russians sending Iskander missiles to Belarus, reminds me of Iraq sending its best fighter aircraft to Iran.

These are Russia's best, & most modern deployed tactical missiles; & they were specifically designed to nominally comply with the INF treaty, while everyone knew they can be modified in hours to fly far much further than the INF limits.

If I were in the Belarus military; I'd park these new missiles in a hanger, as far as possible from stuff they wanted to keep, & guard them with a couple of cardboard cutout soldiers ..... & maybe forward the GPS co-ords to Ukraine, so there isn't any collateral damage.
Flockwitt
Posts: 1037
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2020 9:58 am

Blimey, this war is now 4 months old. It seem like only yesterday when people were just sort of numbly taking in the fact Russian had invaded.
TheFrog
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:29 am

Flockwitt wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 3:15 am Blimey, this war is now 4 months old. It seem like only yesterday when people were just sort of numbly taking in the fact Russian had invaded.
I remain concerned that the West hasn't switched yet into full arsenal of democracy mode.

Still difficult to guess where Putin is going next. But he will keep on probing until he is hurt big time. As long as he doesn't feel the pain, he remains dangerous.
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6803
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

A few days ago:



Now seems to have happened, another new General to get a hospital pass then

User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4920
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

Jockaline wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 3:53 pm
laurent wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 3:15 pm
Hellraiser wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 3:09 pm The launch site for the strike on Svatove was 100km south so it definitely wasn't HIMARS.
Toshka more likely

Looks like the Ukrainians have Either got a stash (been using quite a few) or reactivated stocks.

They did have a very competent Rocket industry (and Jet engines too).
Maybe they were holding them back for emergency use in really critical situations, but because of the weapons now coming from other countries they don't need to do that. Looking forward to news getting better in the days ahead.

Also want to add my appriection for all those that post in this thread, with special mention to Hellraiser, who has been outstanding.
Agreed. Kinda miss Os posting in the thread though. He was good reading early in the conflict.
Jockaline
Posts: 244
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 6:23 pm
Location: Scotland

Uncle fester wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 12:05 pm
Jockaline wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 3:53 pm
laurent wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 3:15 pm

Toshka more likely

Looks like the Ukrainians have Either got a stash (been using quite a few) or reactivated stocks.

They did have a very competent Rocket industry (and Jet engines too).
Maybe they were holding them back for emergency use in really critical situations, but because of the weapons now coming from other countries they don't need to do that. Looking forward to news getting better in the days ahead.

Also want to add my appriection for all those that post in this thread, with special mention to Hellraiser, who has been outstanding.
Agreed. Kinda miss Os posting in the thread though. He was good reading early in the conflict.
Os was a great poster on this thread too, odd that he doesn't post anymore.
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6803
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街



"Unrolled" tweets
1/5 After theRussian missile strike on Kyiv this morning (a civilian building has been hit, injuring a little girl and killing her father), I have already seen three different Russian propaganda messages.

They may serve as a reminder of how the Russian propaganda works.

2/5 The messages are:

1. The building was empty, there was no one inside.
2. The Ukrainian air defence is to blame for shooting down a missile near the building.
3. It's all "fake", just like the "White helmets" stuff in Syria was fake.

There probably are (or will be) more.

3/5 The Russian propaganda machine doesn't care if those messages are mutually exclusive, easily disprovable or downright absurd.

The point is to flood you with multiple "alternate" versions of events. The more the better. They want to make you doubt: "It's not so clear".

4/5 That's exactly what Russians are doing every single time they commit war crimes. After the downing of MH17 in 2014 Russian officials and state media kept producing more and more versions of the event. It was the same with Syria. It was the same after Bucha Massacre.

5/5 They know some versions won't stick at all. They know they'll contradict themselves. They know they'll be caught lying.

But if they manage to make enough people think "Well, who knows what really happened and who's to blame" - they'll succeed. That's their goal.
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6803
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

Good grief...this sounds like parody news but it's in many outlets
Desperate Putin ‘calls up obese 20st retired general, 67,’ to lead troops in Ukraine after ‘running out of commanders’
0:26, 26 Jun 2022 Updated: 1:47, 26 Jun 2022

VLADIMIR Putin has called a morbidly obese general out of retirement to lead his troops in Ukraine as he is running out of senior officers, reports claim. The Russian despot is now "scraping the barrel" and relying on 20st vodka-swilling General Pavel, 67, to revive his faltering invasion.

He is said to be in charge of Putin's special forces in eastern Ukraine after the unit's former commander was seriously injured in an artillery strike, a source told the Daily Star.

The hulking veteran reportedly served in Russia's bungled invasion of Afghanistan in the 1980s and has over four decades' experience under his straining belt.

General Pavel first became a commander of elite troops 25 years ago, but had settled into high-calorie retirement.

He reportedly scoffs five meals a day and washes it down with at least a litre of vodka.
Image
petej
Posts: 2506
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:41 am
Location: Gwent

tabascoboy wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 4:48 pm Good grief...this sounds like parody news but it's in many outlets
Desperate Putin ‘calls up obese 20st retired general, 67,’ to lead troops in Ukraine after ‘running out of commanders’
0:26, 26 Jun 2022 Updated: 1:47, 26 Jun 2022

VLADIMIR Putin has called a morbidly obese general out of retirement to lead his troops in Ukraine as he is running out of senior officers, reports claim. The Russian despot is now "scraping the barrel" and relying on 20st vodka-swilling General Pavel, 67, to revive his faltering invasion.

He is said to be in charge of Putin's special forces in eastern Ukraine after the unit's former commander was seriously injured in an artillery strike, a source told the Daily Star.

The hulking veteran reportedly served in Russia's bungled invasion of Afghanistan in the 1980s and has over four decades' experience under his straining belt.

General Pavel first became a commander of elite troops 25 years ago, but had settled into high-calorie retirement.

He reportedly scoffs five meals a day and washes it down with at least a litre of vodka.
Image
:lol:
I think this one might not be fired because he will have a heart attack or stroke first.
User avatar
Hellraiser
Posts: 2272
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

Image

Ceterum censeo delendam esse Muscovia
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8729
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Hellraiser wrote: Sun Jun 26, 2022 9:21 pm
Some very, very, very juicy targets.

There are obviously plenty of sympathetic Belorussian citizens, & it just needs a couple to plant gps locators on these wagons ....
inactionman
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am

Uncle fester wrote: Mon Jun 27, 2022 6:52 am Russia's defaulted.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/ ... dApp_Other
I'm struggling a bit with this - what benefit is there in disallowing Russia's repayment? By definition it's not funding anything, and it doesn't really change much about Russia's ability to borrow as pretty much all of that is sanctioned anyway.

It just seems to hurt bondholders for no real benefit - unless hurting bondholders is the reason for it?
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6803
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

Another relatively long strike wipes out a Russian ammo depot in Luhansk region, at least 50km range. Suggested as Tochka-U misslie


User avatar
Openside
Posts: 1718
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:27 pm

FalseBayFC wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 7:25 pm Swedish Special Forces Operators show their stuff.

😂😂😂😂😂
User avatar
Hellraiser
Posts: 2272
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

inactionman wrote: Mon Jun 27, 2022 8:14 am
Uncle fester wrote: Mon Jun 27, 2022 6:52 am Russia's defaulted.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/ ... dApp_Other
I'm struggling a bit with this - what benefit is there in disallowing Russia's repayment? By definition it's not funding anything, and it doesn't really change much about Russia's ability to borrow as pretty much all of that is sanctioned anyway.

It just seems to hurt bondholders for no real benefit - unless hurting bondholders is the reason for it?
Russian debt is reduced to junk status and it can't return in any meaningful sense to the bond market even if/when sanctions are lifted. No one will touch them. It's a fundamental principle of the bond market that bond holders cannot be forced to accept repayment in a currency other than that in which the bonds are denominated.
Image

Ceterum censeo delendam esse Muscovia
Rhubarb & Custard
Posts: 2350
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm

inactionman wrote: Mon Jun 27, 2022 8:14 am
Uncle fester wrote: Mon Jun 27, 2022 6:52 am Russia's defaulted.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/ ... dApp_Other
I'm struggling a bit with this - what benefit is there in disallowing Russia's repayment? By definition it's not funding anything, and it doesn't really change much about Russia's ability to borrow as pretty much all of that is sanctioned anyway.

It just seems to hurt bondholders for no real benefit - unless hurting bondholders is the reason for it?
Its part of a suite of actions. And if you threaten someone with sanctions and they invade a sovereign nation anyway then your red lines need to mean something. And this is about Russia not the bondholders.

What in practice this goes on to mean we don't yet know, can't yet know tbh. It's very likely raises the cost of capital to Russia in the short and medium term, and that does worry them else they wouldn't have been using what stockpiles of dollars they had to try and avoid this scenario. You'd think many lenders may now take action to seize overseas Russian assets to cover the debt, how widespread and what assets we don't know, but it's now a fairly common move when a nation doesn't stump up cash. Yes Russia could argue they'd have the cash but for other sanctions in place but it is what it is.

If one has to give one reason for all this it's essentially Russia has a choice now, to fund the invasion or to fund their own populace. Borrowing would have allowed them more room to do both. History will inform nations less able to borrow lose wars, but you could also contend many losing nations cared more about their own people than the Russians do.
TheFrog
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:29 am

Given the situation on the ground, i am starting to feel that we are at the point where NATO should mass aircraft and troops on its borders with Ukraine and Russia, and send an ultimatum to Putin to withdraw from Ukraine or face the full might of NATO military.

But I assume this would be very difficult to implement, having to cover a long border (including protecting non NATO countries like Finland), and having powerful enough forces to fight the Russian army in Ukraine at the same time would require a huge mobilization and be a logistic challenge. In addition I am not even sure we would have enough ammo to fight that war.

But where we are at, at the moment, with Ukraine bleeding its best troops in combat, concerns me and I worry that western equipment is too little to late to allow Ukraine to push the Russian back.
Post Reply