I posted just about all of that in a long post on this thread a year ago:dpedin wrote: Fri Sep 23, 2022 10:38 am OK some folk will not agree with him but this is a pretty realistic scenario we face after this 'budget'. Scary stuff!
Murphy proposes tiered rates to pump the debt, which I predicted would be the move. But there are some real issues with this I think (I'm not sure, it's off the map), it could maybe risk a sterling crisis if it's not seen as credible by the market._Os_ wrote: Thu Oct 07, 2021 3:51 pm Any target to return a budget surplus through cuts was abandoned by Osborne as long ago as 2016, but without any credible plan to achieve growth and eliminate the deficit that way. Much of the UK's debt is held by the Bank of England (BoE purchases gilts from banks in return for interest-bearing reserves, about a third of UK government debt now takes this form, this makes servicing the debt much cheaper as long as the Bank Rate is at the historically low 0.1%), but if the Bank Rate increases servicing that debt will rise too and further expand the deficit. Independent monetary institutions don't last long in a full on banana republic for reasons like this; if there's no GDP growth the UK government will end up having a more or less existential political stake in the Bank Rate. A good trick will be having tiered rates to pump the debt even higher (probably all sorts of downsides in that, but if you're shameless it doesn't matter and is a good enough quick fix).
Without a credible growth path all the economic unicorns hit the wall eventually, that's the usual way a nationalist/populist mess of the type the Tories are gets removed from power. Until then money machine goes bburrrrrrrr, and the Tories will be in power for this entire decade.
There were ways of not ending up in this mess, but the politics weren't and still aren't favourable for those softer landings (Tories are polling above 30% again). They should've been voted out and replaced with anyone, but weren't.