Twitter has found itself in the position that it's multiple different apps at the same time, and that leads to an impossible monetising model. You have content creators who provide entertaining and interesting output - if anything these people should be paid for their content, by those consuming it. Then you have companies using it as a customer service tool - in that case you can argue the companies should be paying. You have people using it as a social network - you might argue this should be advertising revenue based. There are groups using it for campaigning, it might be argued they should pay a fee for this. And many, many more. The monetisation of such a jumble is impossible, so either you have to accept it and crash or carve out the one or two sets of things that will make money, and damn the rest.JM2K6 wrote: Wed May 10, 2023 8:26 amBecause the secret of twitter is the ease of use, the huge userbase, and the fact that it's not the underlying tech that made it popular. Twitter is incredibly poorly designed and only getting worse, yet is better than all the alternatives currently.EnergiseR2 wrote: Wed May 10, 2023 7:22 am Very droll.
https://www.thejournal.ie/tucker-carlso ... 2-May2023/
Can't say I understand why anyone has stayed on Twitter at this stage and how someone hasn't made a viable alternative. Mastodon seems way over engineered
It's almost unusable at the moment though, the "blue check replies get priority" thing is an absolute shitshow. Just reams and reams of the worst possible takes known to mankind. It's like being back on PR.
You could split the app, into things like Twitter News, Twitter business service, Twitter creator, and some of these would be free to subscribe to, some of them paid. In some os them the creators get paid for their content, in others, they pay to provide content (E.g. customer service use). But you have to break it up and make it radically different.