I wasn’t saying either. I was just posting that video of the peaceful protestors so others can make their own assessment.
Peaceful protests…
I would suggest if you post videos from racist and fascists and neo-nazi groups then you are a fucking nut job.
I did it as a poke to TH.C69 wrote: Wed Mar 13, 2024 8:04 pmI would suggest if you post videos from racist and fascists and neo-nazi groups then you are a fucking nut job.
Do you know what Britain First stand for?
Ymx wrote: Wed Mar 13, 2024 9:40 pmI did it as a poke to TH.C69 wrote: Wed Mar 13, 2024 8:04 pmI would suggest if you post videos from racist and fascists and neo-nazi groups then you are a fucking nut job.Ymx wrote: Wed Mar 13, 2024 6:49 pm
I wasn’t saying either. I was just posting that video of the peaceful protestors so others can make their own assessment.
Peaceful protests…
Do you know what Britain First stand for?
Extremist thick twats can find other extremist thick twats and post it on a social media site that normal people now mostly avoid due to it being dominated by extremist thick twats that algorithms on it promote content posted by extremist thick twats. With a population of 70million odd even if extremist thick twats are 1% of the population that is still 700,000 people.Ymx wrote: Wed Mar 13, 2024 4:26 pm I managed to find this video, and it’s posted by Britain First.
Peaceful protestors.
“Hamas is my brother “
So let me get this right, you have no issue in posting videos from this organisation. Is that correct?Ymx wrote: Wed Mar 13, 2024 9:40 pmI did it as a poke to TH.C69 wrote: Wed Mar 13, 2024 8:04 pmI would suggest if you post videos from racist and fascists and neo-nazi groups then you are a fucking nut job.Ymx wrote: Wed Mar 13, 2024 6:49 pm
I wasn’t saying either. I was just posting that video of the peaceful protestors so others can make their own assessment.
Peaceful protests…
Do you know what Britain First stand for?
Although I’d suggest the video is real enough, irrespective of who recorded and posted it.
That was the main point.
What did you think of the video ?
OK. If we are seeking to have an honest discussion, I'll provide my views. Sinking feeling as I type that I'm falling into a trap.Ymx wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:02 am I meant what do you think about guys like him in protests around European cities?
Putting all trolling aside …
You think the IDF should be eradicated? Do you think the IDF are deliberately trying to kill civilians?
I don’t. I think they have an extremely difficult job to avoid civilian casualties. Hamas dressing and attacking dressed as civilians. Hamas embedding themselves. Palestinian people hiding Hamas and weapons, cheering them on. Hamas sending volumes of fake atrocities, silicone dolls, dead people who blink, fake blood. I mean, Mr fafo. And I see many lapping it up.
It’s been called a genocide as a norm now. The lie repeated so many times that people don’t even get pulled up on it anymore.
The numbers being published are from Hamas. They don’t recognise Hamas deaths.
So that’s what I think.
There's a lot of decency in this post, though I cant say it's exactly how I'd choose to sum up a situation in which an imprisoned and brutalised population are now being killed in the tens of thousands by the army of the occupying power.C T wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 10:25 amOK. If we are seeking to have an honest discussion, I'll provide my views. Sinking feeling as I type that I'm falling into a trap.Ymx wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:02 am I meant what do you think about guys like him in protests around European cities?
Putting all trolling aside …
You think the IDF should be eradicated? Do you think the IDF are deliberately trying to kill civilians?
I don’t. I think they have an extremely difficult job to avoid civilian casualties. Hamas dressing and attacking dressed as civilians. Hamas embedding themselves. Palestinian people hiding Hamas and weapons, cheering them on. Hamas sending volumes of fake atrocities, silicone dolls, dead people who blink, fake blood. I mean, Mr fafo. And I see many lapping it up.
It’s been called a genocide as a norm now. The lie repeated so many times that people don’t even get pulled up on it anymore.
The numbers being published are from Hamas. They don’t recognise Hamas deaths.
So that’s what I think.
Hamas may be terrorists to us, however they do have support from a fair amount of Palestinians. I accept I'm no expert, but Israel have to take some responsibility for this. Prior to the 7th of Oct they've been doing some stuff that at best could be considered unkind, surely driving support to Hamas?
In terms of civilian deaths, I think the IDF are trying to do the bare minimum to keep on the right side of their important allies, and they're failing at that.
Hamas are horrendous, they can't hide amongst civilians and scream about genocide when civilians die. However, and I might be being a bit flippant here, but I'm pretty sure all the women and children that are dying aren't Hamas.
So in summary I've got very mixed views on this.
Israel can't pretend that this only started on the 7th of Oct, Hamas can't pretend that their tactics are not causing civilian deaths.
Further to this I can't shake the feeling that the IDF are using a much more scattergun approach than is needed, safe in the knowledge that they can just say it's Hamas' fault.
I'm starting to find myself thinking that both sides deserve each other.
Not sure we should be trusting numbers coming from either side though.
Be interesting for someone knowledgeable to rate the current generation of IDF soldiers against previous ones. Are the current crop of kids with guns as well-trained and battle hardened as their older brothers and sisters? Are they more trigger-happy, etc? Are more civilians dying as a result?C T wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 10:25 am
Further to this I can't shake the feeling that the IDF are using a much more scattergun approach than is needed, safe in the knowledge that they can just say it's Hamas' fault.
It is a tiny number of people protesting and they are allowed to protest.Ymx wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:02 am I meant what do you think about guys like him in protests around European cities?
Putting all trolling aside …
You think the IDF should be eradicated? Do you think the IDF are deliberately trying to kill civilians?
I don’t. I think they have an extremely difficult job to avoid civilian casualties. Hamas dressing and attacking dressed as civilians. Hamas embedding themselves. Palestinian people hiding Hamas and weapons, cheering them on. Hamas sending volumes of fake atrocities, silicone dolls, dead people who blink, fake blood. I mean, Mr fafo. And I see many lapping it up.
It’s been called a genocide as a norm now. The lie repeated so many times that people don’t even get pulled up on it anymore.
The numbers being published are from Hamas. They don’t recognise Hamas deaths.
So that’s what I think.
Rubbish, it is a toxic racist genocidal institutonally racist organisation.Calculon wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 10:09 am If the IDF is eradicated it means the end of Israel and Jews being ethnically cleansed from the Middle East. A repeat of October 7th, without the Israelis being able to defend themselves, and until none of them are left. C69 is fully aware of that
Actually, I’m pleased you posted. We could do with more open posts like thisC T wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 10:25 amOK. If we are seeking to have an honest discussion, I'll provide my views. Sinking feeling as I type that I'm falling into a trap.Ymx wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:02 am I meant what do you think about guys like him in protests around European cities?
Putting all trolling aside …
You think the IDF should be eradicated? Do you think the IDF are deliberately trying to kill civilians?
I don’t. I think they have an extremely difficult job to avoid civilian casualties. Hamas dressing and attacking dressed as civilians. Hamas embedding themselves. Palestinian people hiding Hamas and weapons, cheering them on. Hamas sending volumes of fake atrocities, silicone dolls, dead people who blink, fake blood. I mean, Mr fafo. And I see many lapping it up.
It’s been called a genocide as a norm now. The lie repeated so many times that people don’t even get pulled up on it anymore.
The numbers being published are from Hamas. They don’t recognise Hamas deaths.
So that’s what I think.
Hamas may be terrorists to us, however they do have support from a fair amount of Palestinians. I accept I'm no expert, but Israel have to take some responsibility for this. Prior to the 7th of Oct they've been doing some stuff that at best could be considered unkind, surely driving support to Hamas?
In terms of civilian deaths, I think the IDF are trying to do the bare minimum to keep on the right side of their important allies, and they're failing at that.
Hamas are horrendous, they can't hide amongst civilians and scream about genocide when civilians die. However, and I might be being a bit flippant here, but I'm pretty sure all the women and children that are dying aren't Hamas.
So in summary I've got very mixed views on this.
Israel can't pretend that this only started on the 7th of Oct, Hamas can't pretend that their tactics are not causing civilian deaths.
Further to this I can't shake the feeling that the IDF are using a much more scattergun approach than is needed, safe in the knowledge that they can just say it's Hamas' fault.
I'm starting to find myself thinking that both sides deserve each other.
Not sure we should be trusting numbers coming from either side though.
This iteration of it isn't.petej wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 11:04 amIt is a tiny number of people protesting and they are allowed to protest.Ymx wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:02 am I meant what do you think about guys like him in protests around European cities?
Putting all trolling aside …
You think the IDF should be eradicated? Do you think the IDF are deliberately trying to kill civilians?
I don’t. I think they have an extremely difficult job to avoid civilian casualties. Hamas dressing and attacking dressed as civilians. Hamas embedding themselves. Palestinian people hiding Hamas and weapons, cheering them on. Hamas sending volumes of fake atrocities, silicone dolls, dead people who blink, fake blood. I mean, Mr fafo. And I see many lapping it up.
It’s been called a genocide as a norm now. The lie repeated so many times that people don’t even get pulled up on it anymore.
The numbers being published are from Hamas. They don’t recognise Hamas deaths.
So that’s what I think.
It is a millenia old conflict and unfortunately and many people on both sides will be dragged into it. It is very sad and depressing and there is no obvious solution when you look at the region and see the leadership and role of religion
Are Israelis marching in the streets calling for a cease-fire? Is there evidence that a different Cabinet will withdraw their troops?C69 wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 3:17 pm The well known anti Semite Chuck Schumer stated earlier today that Israel is becoming a pariah state and calls for an election in Israel.
There have been several protests, one ongoing. The narrative being so tightly controlled, you don’t hear about the dissenting views but there is no shortage of them.Sandstorm wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 4:47 pmAre Israelis marching in the streets calling for a cease-fire? Is there evidence that a different Cabinet will withdraw their troops?C69 wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 3:17 pm The well known anti Semite Chuck Schumer stated earlier today that Israel is becoming a pariah state and calls for an election in Israel.
The IDF claim everything is false when civilians are killedYmx wrote: Fri Mar 15, 2024 7:34 am Look at the way sky have framed this, where there are two conflicting sources.
One Hamas (headlines), the other IDF in small with the word false quoted.
Hamas only mentioned as the source the second time.
Immediately after the IDF statement, it throws in a paragraph to discredit it.
![]()
C69 wrote: Fri Mar 15, 2024 7:39 amThe IDF claim everything is false when civilians are killedYmx wrote: Fri Mar 15, 2024 7:34 am Look at the way sky have framed this, where there are two conflicting sources.
One Hamas (headlines), the other IDF in small with the word false quoted.
Hamas only mentioned as the source the second time.
Immediately after the IDF statement, it throws in a paragraph to discredit it.
![]()
Hamas and the IDF sources should be treated with some scepticism.
N
That might be the case, but look at the way it’s already been framed by sky.C69 wrote: Fri Mar 15, 2024 7:39 amThe IDF claim everything is false when civilians are killedYmx wrote: Fri Mar 15, 2024 7:34 am Look at the way sky have framed this, where there are two conflicting sources.
One Hamas (headlines), the other IDF in small with the word false quoted.
Hamas only mentioned as the source the second time.
Immediately after the IDF statement, it throws in a paragraph to discredit it.
![]()
Hamas and the IDF sources should be treated with some scepticism.
N
I'll take this one. We're subjected to a barrage of propaganda followed by bullying if we dare stray from the thought that Israel is perfectly entitled to be carrying on this way.Sandstorm wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 4:47 pmAre Israelis marching in the streets calling for a cease-fire? Is there evidence that a different Cabinet will withdraw their troops?C69 wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 3:17 pm The well known anti Semite Chuck Schumer stated earlier today that Israel is becoming a pariah state and calls for an election in Israel.
Poimt of order! Comcast own Sky Media not the Aussie/American cunt.Uncle fester wrote: Fri Mar 15, 2024 10:17 am If Sky are "leaning left", there are two options.
1. Palestinians have "won" the propaganda war.
Or
2. Israeli behaviour is so reprehensible that even Murdoch owned media can't excuse it anymore.
They have access to International media too though I presume. There is not real excuse for not really knowing what's going on. Ignorance is as an excuse isn't credible therefore.Uncle fester wrote: Fri Mar 15, 2024 12:37 pm Noted.
Also with Israeli domestic media, their coverage is very different to what we get. Civilian casualties are downplayed. Any coverage showing Palestinians focuses on combatants or potential combatants, i.e. no women and children. IDF spokespersons feature VERY heavily.
Easy to dismiss it as anti you-know-what or with a generous sprinkling of whataboutery.Jockaline wrote: Fri Mar 15, 2024 12:45 pmThey have access to International media too though I presume. There is not real excuse for not really knowing what's going on. Ignorance is as an excuse isn't credible therefore.Uncle fester wrote: Fri Mar 15, 2024 12:37 pm Noted.
Also with Israeli domestic media, their coverage is very different to what we get. Civilian casualties are downplayed. Any coverage showing Palestinians focuses on combatants or potential combatants, i.e. no women and children. IDF spokespersons feature VERY heavily.
Beyond the human lives lost it is incredibly sad to think of all the damage done to the architecture and buildings and such that have been around forever and that gave the place its character.C69 wrote: Fri Mar 15, 2024 3:04 pm The state of Khan Younis after the surgical strikes of Israel.
Not targetting civilians or civilian areas at all
![]()
Calculon wrote: Fri Mar 15, 2024 10:06 pm I thought Gaza was supposed to have been a concentration camp
So presumably you've found at least one post or sentence - I'm not asking for the "always" that you said there, just the one.
Indeed
Open air prison was the phrase.Sandstorm wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2023 8:14 amYupMuttonbird wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2023 8:13 am What was this "music festival for peace held near the Gaza border fence"?
Unless they had actively engaged Palestinian representatives, it just looks like Israeli settlers partying outside the doors of an open air prison.
This could be the devastating proof that Hamas is faking its death figures
But too many won’t believe anything other than that Israel is deliberately targeting women and children
JAKE WALLIS SIMONS
16 March 2024 • 9:00pm
Jake Wallis Simons
2334
One of the marks of anti-Semitism, George Orwell observed in 1945, is “an ability to believe stories that could not possibly be true”. Which brings us smartly to Hamas and how the broadcast media, aid organisations, international bodies and world leaders take its disinformation as gospel. Last week it became clear that this gullibility may have led to a crime against reality.
A new analysis of the group’s casualty statistics indicates that the rag-tag terror army may have pulled off one of the biggest propaganda coups of modern times. The figures, repeated by everyone from the White House to the BBC, are freighted with familiarity: 30,000 dead in Gaza, 70 per cent of whom are women and children. Yet it now seems overwhelmingly likely that these statistics are fabricated.
Professor Abraham Wyner, a data scientist at the University of Pennsylvania, has conducted a thorough analysis. He found that Hamas’s official civilian death toll was statistically impossible. “Most likely, the Hamas ministry settled on a daily total arbitrarily,” he wrote in an incendiary essay in Tablet. “We know this because the daily totals increase too consistently to be real. Then they assigned about 70 per cent of the total to be women and children, splitting that amount randomly from day to day. Then they in-filled the number of men as set by the predetermined total. This explains all the data observed.”
The giveaways were many. For example, the reported death toll mounted “with almost metronomical linearity”, Prof Wyner found, showing little daily variation. Obviously, this bore no resemblance to any plausible version of reality. Then there was the fact that, according to Hamas data from 29 October, 26 men came back to life; and the fact that on several days, no men were apparently killed at all, but only women. Were we really supposed to believe any of this?
In February, Hamas admitted to losing 6,000 of its fighters, representing more than 20 per cent of the total casualties reported. Given its claims that 70 per cent of the dead were women and children, there were two possible conclusions: either almost no male civilians had died, or almost all the men in Gaza were fighting for Hamas. Both were obviously absurd.
Therefore, the number of women and children killed was likely grossly exaggerated. If that is the case – if, as Prof Wyner suggests, “the casualties are not overwhelmingly women and children, and the majority may be Hamas fighters” – where does that leave western outrage? Has the West fallen victim to a monstrous con?
The true ratio of civilian casualties to combatants is likely to be exceptionally low, “at most 1.4 to 1 and perhaps as low as 1 to 1”. This, Prof Wyner says, is a “successful effort to prevent unnecessary loss of life while fighting an implacable enemy that protects itself with civilians”.
By rights, if the central pillar of the anti-Israel edifice has been discredited, the whole structure should come tumbling down. But don’t hold your breath. The reason why Hamas’s dodgy data is so easily believed is confirmation bias. The drip-drip of Israelophobic propaganda over the years has created a powerful tendency to view the Jewish state, Britain’s democratic ally, as a colonialist aggressor and the Palestinians – even as they butcher children – as the “freedom fighters”. Regardless of the evidence, to many people this has become second nature.
It speaks of millennia of inherited anti-Semitism. A 2012 study by economists Nico Voigtländer and Hans-Joachim Voth found that Germans from towns where Jews were blamed for the Black Death and burnt alive in the 14th century were significantly more likely to vote for the Nazis 600 years later. In his 1945 essay, Orwell recalls a “young intellectual, communist or near-communist” remarking: “No, I do not like Jews. I’ve never made any secret of that. I can’t stick them. Mind you, I’m not anti-Semitic, of course.” Depressingly little has changed.
That is the advantage enjoyed by the jihadis of Gaza. They didn’t even need to keep their strategy a secret. Everyone knows they try to get civilians killed for propaganda gains, aiming to curtail Israeli operations with international outrage. Everyone knows that their censors keep dead terrorists away from the cameras, giving the world the impression that Israel is only attacking civilians (look up former AP reporter Matti Friedman’s seminal 2014 essay, “What the media gets wrong about Israel”, for a sense of how long such games have been played). A gang that murdered and mutilated babies may also, on occasion, be tempted to lie. So much should be obvious. But all this is smoothly eclipsed when a greater narrative is at work.
It’s not that there is a lack of journalistic curiosity in large parts of the media. It’s just that, when it comes to Israel, facts are subordinated to assumptions. In February, BBC Verify quoted a World Health Organisation official: The [Hamas] ministry has “‘good capacity in data collection’ and its previous reporting has been credible and ‘well developed’”. This was the same WHO that had singled out Israel for condemnation at an international assembly largely devoted to Covid. And this was the same BBC Verify that had partly based a story on an eyewitness who had reportedly worked for an Iranian state news outlet and celebrated the deaths of Jews on social media.
It is time for us to say: J’Accuse. Just as Emile Zola laid the charge of anti-Semitism at the feet of the French establishment during the Dreyfus Affair in 1898, we must do so to the international establishment today.