So, coronavirus...

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
Plato’sCave
Posts: 183
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:30 pm

Dinsdale Piranha wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 2:18 pm
robmatic wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:20 pm
Lemoentjie wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:08 pm The main problem with sorting by jobs is it can be hard to check who actually works where.

In a small country with good social cohesion (Iceland) it's definitely possible, but in SA or USA or UK it can be very difficult. And because a large minority people are scumbags, they will lie about their job so they can skip the normal order of vaccinations.
You can almost guarantee that whatever the sector, it would be the folk in offices with relatively little risk or exposure to the public who would be getting vaccinated first.
A friend works for a large defence contractor in the UK. Apparently a few staff were agitating to be declared 'critical workers' which technically defence companies can do. The company, to its credit, said they weren't critical as they are just regular office staff.
What company?
tc27
Posts: 2559
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Cant get through the FT paywall but have read that a few days ago.

Not sure really - difference between England and Scotland less than variation between worst and best English region with same or greater pops - to put it another way if Scotland was recorded as an English region it would be a well performing (2nd best) but not exceptional one. The second point is the new variant (which is thought to have come from a single person) really hammered England in particular. Anyway NI appears to be the best performing UK nation so thats surely the model?

My basic analysis is their is a fag paper between policy in different parts of the UK but that the timing was better for Scotland and NI (earlier in the cycle).

Secondly seems to be repeating the error Devi Shridar et al made in the summer in claiming the virus was eliminated in the summer which was based on ignoring deaths recorded every day by NRS. It clear (and has being admitted) that the SGs epidemiological modelling was significantly underestimated the prevalence of COVID-19 in Scotland over the summer.

Prof Woolhouse had some interesting thoughts on this : https://inews.co.uk/news/scotland/scotl ... ser-887986
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

Saint wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 9:46 pm
Raggs wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 9:07 pm
Saint wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 6:52 pm As an aside, 535k doses delivered yesterday
Supply improving again?
Looking that way
Only 430k doses delivered yesterday, so supply still seems to be an issue. We need to hit around twice the current daily average to hit the long term targets
tc27
Posts: 2559
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Saint wrote: Sun Feb 28, 2021 5:34 pm
Saint wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 9:46 pm
Raggs wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 9:07 pm

Supply improving again?
Looking that way
Only 430k doses delivered yesterday, so supply still seems to be an issue. We need to hit around twice the current daily average to hit the long term targets
The official targets till look like being hit with ease:



Unless you referring to the mooted idea that all adults with have at least one dose by May?

The next two weeks are supposed to see a massive increase in supply so I would expect the daily average to shoot up.
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

tc27 wrote: Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:27 pm
Saint wrote: Sun Feb 28, 2021 5:34 pm
Saint wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 9:46 pm

Looking that way
Only 430k doses delivered yesterday, so supply still seems to be an issue. We need to hit around twice the current daily average to hit the long term targets
The official targets till look like being hit with ease:



Unless you referring to the mooted idea that all adults with have at least one dose by May?

The next two weeks are supposed to see a massive increase in supply so I would expect the daily average to shoot up.
Those look like the very original targets, which assumed 2 million doses per day. Obviously we're ahead of that stilk, but the revised target was to be a long way ahead of that.
Ovals
Posts: 1573
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:52 pm

Pretty good improvement in numbers today, lowest since the end of Sept. Hope we see similar improvements over the next 8 days, prior to the kids going back to school on the 8th March. The benefits of the vaccine programme should, increasingly, be kicking in by then, to help compensate for the increased mixing.
Dinsdale Piranha
Posts: 1021
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:08 pm

Ovals wrote: Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:25 pm Pretty good improvement in numbers today, lowest since the end of Sept. Hope we see similar improvements over the next 8 days, prior to the kids going back to school on the 8th March. The benefits of the vaccine programme should, increasingly, be kicking in by then, to help compensate for the increased mixing.
Cases in my area have halved in a week. Just in time for schools to drive it up again no doubt. Having said that, a load of my friends have been vaccinated in the last week - all mid 50s - so that's progressing well.
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2803
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

Well If the schools don't go back next week I'm going to murder someone, so we'll at least avoid that death if all goes to plan.
tc27
Posts: 2559
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Brazil variant is here just in time for the first lockdown easing.
The unidentified England case is not linked to five other UK cases.

Three of those cases are Scottish residents who flew to Aberdeen from Brazil via Paris and London, the Scottish government said.

Holyrood said the three people tested positive while self-isolating. Other passengers who were on the same flight to Aberdeen are now being contacted.

The other two cases in England are from the same household in South Gloucestershire after someone returned from Brazil on 10 February - five days before the government's hotel quarantine rule came into force.

Two other people in the same household have also since tested positive for Covid - but tests are still ongoing to check if it is the same variant, so they are not included in the overall UK total of six.
Obviously the need to allow people to fly in from Brazil in February was more important than attempting to keep the variant out.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 11712
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

tc27 wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:53 am Brazil variant is here just in time for the first lockdown easing.
The unidentified England case is not linked to five other UK cases.

Three of those cases are Scottish residents who flew to Aberdeen from Brazil via Paris and London, the Scottish government said.

Holyrood said the three people tested positive while self-isolating. Other passengers who were on the same flight to Aberdeen are now being contacted.

The other two cases in England are from the same household in South Gloucestershire after someone returned from Brazil on 10 February - five days before the government's hotel quarantine rule came into force.

Two other people in the same household have also since tested positive for Covid - but tests are still ongoing to check if it is the same variant, so they are not included in the overall UK total of six.
Obviously the need to allow people to fly in from Brazil in February was more important than attempting to keep the variant out.
Some people have also avoided being "tagged as flying in from Brazil" by going Rio - JFK - Heathrow. They bragged about it on Twitter.
Someone else suspected they had Covid, travelled anyway, landed in UK, had a test and then gave false address info, so UK Police can't find them.

The border control in the UK is a fucking farce!
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7323
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

Sandstorm wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:13 am
tc27 wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:53 am Brazil variant is here just in time for the first lockdown easing.
The unidentified England case is not linked to five other UK cases.

Three of those cases are Scottish residents who flew to Aberdeen from Brazil via Paris and London, the Scottish government said.

Holyrood said the three people tested positive while self-isolating. Other passengers who were on the same flight to Aberdeen are now being contacted.

The other two cases in England are from the same household in South Gloucestershire after someone returned from Brazil on 10 February - five days before the government's hotel quarantine rule came into force.

Two other people in the same household have also since tested positive for Covid - but tests are still ongoing to check if it is the same variant, so they are not included in the overall UK total of six.
Obviously the need to allow people to fly in from Brazil in February was more important than attempting to keep the variant out.
Some people have also avoided being "tagged as flying in from Brazil" by going Rio - JFK - Heathrow. They bragged about it on Twitter.
Someone else suspected they had Covid, travelled anyway, landed in UK, had a test and then gave false address info, so UK Police can't find them.

The border control in the UK is a fucking farce!
So who is correct?
The politicians
Zahawi rejected claims the government had dithered when it came to imposing hotel quarantine for arrivals from high-risk countries. He said:
I would say to you that the border controls that we have are pretty stringent. Even countries that had hotel quarantine, like Australia, still have to deal with the variants actually challenging them in the same way they challenge us.
Or the scientists?
Dr Deepti Gurdasani, an epidemiologist at Queen Mary University of London, told BBC Breakfast this morning that the discovery of the P1 Brazil variant in England highlighted the “failures in quarantine policy”. She said:
Sage has advised that, unless we had a comprehensive, managed quarantine policy at our borders, something like this would happen. But unfortunately it’s something that we’ve been quite complacent about; now we’re just seeing the consequences of that.
tc27
Posts: 2559
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Just in case UK posters are not aware anyone over 60 should now be able to get an appointment and you don't need to wait to be asked:

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavir ... ccination/
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7323
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

tc27 wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:46 am Just in case UK posters are not aware anyone over 60 should now be able to get an appointment and you don't need to wait to be asked:

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavir ... ccination/
Yep! Booked my wife an appointment for this Thursday. Plenty of dates available.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 11712
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

SaintK wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:32 am
So who is correct?
The politicians
About once a decade....
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 11712
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

More people died from Covid each day in UK in January than did in the last 14 months in Australia. Same issues says Mr Zahawi..... :crazy:
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6815
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

tc27 wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:46 am Just in case UK posters are not aware anyone over 60 should now be able to get an appointment and you don't need to wait to be asked:

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavir ... ccination/
Over 55's soon I hope!
tc27
Posts: 2559
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

tabascoboy wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 11:43 am
tc27 wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:46 am Just in case UK posters are not aware anyone over 60 should now be able to get an appointment and you don't need to wait to be asked:

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavir ... ccination/
Over 55's soon I hope!
Very soon - government sources saying they expect the rate to double in March!
Biffer
Posts: 10039
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

tc27 wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 11:50 am
tabascoboy wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 11:43 am
tc27 wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:46 am Just in case UK posters are not aware anyone over 60 should now be able to get an appointment and you don't need to wait to be asked:

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavir ... ccination/
Over 55's soon I hope!
Very soon - government sources saying they expect the rate to double in March!
and to be clear, that's double the rate we were going earlier, not the reduced rate of the last week or two.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
walletoraccess
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 6:26 am

at the grand old age of 63 I had my first AZ injection yesterday late afternoon
Other than a sore are around the injection site , no side effects
The last 24 hour numbers they use - up to what time do they include?
Ovals
Posts: 1573
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:52 pm

walletoraccess wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:21 pm at the grand old age of 63 I had my first AZ injection yesterday late afternoon
Other than a sore are around the injection site , no side effects
The last 24 hour numbers they use - up to what time do they include?
I had mine 20 days ago - so just coming up to the point where it becomes very effective. :cool: Mrs Ovals is a week behind.

Hope they can get the vax rate up - they'll need to start doing mass 2nd jabs soon - so we'll need to double the rate to continue the brilliant progress of getting the next groups vaxxed - and those groups are probably more likely spread the virus than the older groups.
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

Only 205K doses yesterday, but that's actually an increase on last week
dpedin
Posts: 3338
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

SaintK wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:32 am
Sandstorm wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:13 am
tc27 wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:53 am Brazil variant is here just in time for the first lockdown easing.



Obviously the need to allow people to fly in from Brazil in February was more important than attempting to keep the variant out.
Some people have also avoided being "tagged as flying in from Brazil" by going Rio - JFK - Heathrow. They bragged about it on Twitter.
Someone else suspected they had Covid, travelled anyway, landed in UK, had a test and then gave false address info, so UK Police can't find them.

The border control in the UK is a fucking farce!
So who is correct?
The politicians
Zahawi rejected claims the government had dithered when it came to imposing hotel quarantine for arrivals from high-risk countries. He said:
I would say to you that the border controls that we have are pretty stringent. Even countries that had hotel quarantine, like Australia, still have to deal with the variants actually challenging them in the same way they challenge us.
Or the scientists?
Dr Deepti Gurdasani, an epidemiologist at Queen Mary University of London, told BBC Breakfast this morning that the discovery of the P1 Brazil variant in England highlighted the “failures in quarantine policy”. She said:
Sage has advised that, unless we had a comprehensive, managed quarantine policy at our borders, something like this would happen. But unfortunately it’s something that we’ve been quite complacent about; now we’re just seeing the consequences of that.
Only 1% of everyone who flies into the UK are put into a Quarantine Hotel, the rest 99%, are free to travel by public transport to wherever they are going. They are all supposed to self isolate but who knows if they do, many are not checked on. Watch the Home Affairs Committee session chaired by Yvette Cooper, it is very illuminating and somewhat worrying.
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

Empirical data continues to flow in from the UK. By definition, this does almost exclusively from the highest at risk groups, so far and it's very encouraging. A single shot of either AZ or PF reduces Covid hospitalisation by 80% in over 80s

A single shot of PF reduces deaths from Covid in over 80s by 83% (not enough data yet from AZ as it started a month later)

In over 70s, a single shot reduces symptomatic Covid by over 60%

Within a percentage point or 2, both vaccines appear to perform the same - and ahead of the trial results.
dpedin
Posts: 3338
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

Saint wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:31 pm Empirical data continues to flow in from the UK. By definition, this does almost exclusively from the highest at risk groups, so far and it's very encouraging. A single shot of either AZ or PF reduces Covid hospitalisation by 80% in over 80s

A single shot of PF reduces deaths from Covid in over 80s by 83% (not enough data yet from AZ as it started a month later)

In over 70s, a single shot reduces symptomatic Covid by over 60%

Within a percentage point or 2, both vaccines appear to perform the same - and ahead of the trial results.
Excellent news!
dkm57
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:08 pm

Got my appointment for 1st jab on Friday
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 11712
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

dkm57 wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 11:24 pm Got my appointment for 1st jab on Friday
:clap:
User avatar
Denny Crane
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:29 pm

Ex BBC & ITV reporter Anna Brees talking to Daily Mail Journalist David Rose about breaking the media protocols of silence on Ivermectin. With Dr Tess Lawrie and Dr Pierre Kory

As a rule we disbelieve all the facts and theories for which we have no use.”
― William James
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

dpedin wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:58 pm
Saint wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:31 pm Empirical data continues to flow in from the UK. By definition, this does almost exclusively from the highest at risk groups, so far and it's very encouraging. A single shot of either AZ or PF reduces Covid hospitalisation by 80% in over 80s

A single shot of PF reduces deaths from Covid in over 80s by 83% (not enough data yet from AZ as it started a month later)

In over 70s, a single shot reduces symptomatic Covid by over 60%

Within a percentage point or 2, both vaccines appear to perform the same - and ahead of the trial results.
Excellent news!
It;s all highly suggestive that the J&J vaccine probably needs to be delivered as a double dose as well for long term efficacy. J&J are still running trials as to the efficacy on a double dose regime
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5506
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Anyone remember how Boris saved Christmas...

Image
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
tc27
Posts: 2559
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Seems little justification for not approving AZ for over 65s now surely? The mass data from the UK now surely answering any concerns over the lack of data from the trials?

France has in fact just approved it.
Last edited by tc27 on Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
tc27
Posts: 2559
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Insane_Homer wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:14 am Anyone remember how Boris saved Christmas...

Image
Again not defending the bungling of the winter lockdown boggoloo but for context the UK variant needs to be considered - seems to be far more transmittable
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

tc27 wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:14 am Seems little justification for not approving AZ for over 65s now surely? The mass data from the UK now surely answering any concerns over the lack of data from the trials?

France has in fact just approved it.
No peer review yet - so form a German or French perspective it's not really changed until they analyse the data fully. They're being ultra-cautious, and have made a bit of a rod for their own back now - even if they were to approve I think it likely many people will actually refuse an AZ jab
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

tc27 wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:16 am
Insane_Homer wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:14 am Anyone remember how Boris saved Christmas...

Image
Again not defending the bungling of the winter lockdown boggoloo but for context the UK variant needs to be considered - seems to be far more transmittable
Agreed. The appearance and spread of the Kent variant caught everyone out a bit and certainly impact that graph, although the Christmas plans were optimistic regardless
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5506
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

tc27 wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:16 am
Insane_Homer wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:14 am Anyone remember how Boris saved Christmas...
Spoiler
Show
Image
Again not defending the bungling of the winter lockdown boggoloo but for context the UK variant needs to be considered - seems to be far more transmittable
The H69/V70 started detectable growth in Aug 2020. Strangely Demark seemed to get it under control in Nov, we didn't.
uk variant.JPG
uk variant.JPG (37.27 KiB) Viewed 1441 times
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... 2.full.pdf
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Dogbert
Posts: 791
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2020 7:32 am

tc27 wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:16 am
Insane_Homer wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:14 am Anyone remember how Boris saved Christmas...

Image
Again not defending the bungling of the winter lockdown boggoloo but for context the UK variant needs to be considered - seems to be far more transmittable
Scotland reaps dividend of Covid response that diverged from England’s
Imposing a winter lockdown earlier and prioritising care home vaccinations have kept death rate lower

https://www.ft.com/content/e1eddd2f-cb0 ... 83810fae8d
Lager & Lime - we don't do cocktails
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

Insane_Homer wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:28 am
tc27 wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:16 am
Insane_Homer wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:14 am Anyone remember how Boris saved Christmas...
Spoiler
Show
Image
Again not defending the bungling of the winter lockdown boggoloo but for context the UK variant needs to be considered - seems to be far more transmittable
The H69/V70 started detectable growth in Aug 2020. Strangely Demark seemed to get it under control in Nov, we didn't.
uk variant.JPG
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... 2.full.pdf
We were in lockdown 2 when it became very apparent what this was - as while Covid numbers were dropping everywhere else, they didn't drop in Kent. I don;t think continuing lockdown 2 would have been all that viable as people would have simply ignored it. It was already falling apart as it was
dpedin
Posts: 3338
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

Saint wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:24 am
tc27 wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:16 am
Insane_Homer wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:14 am Anyone remember how Boris saved Christmas...

Image
Again not defending the bungling of the winter lockdown boggoloo but for context the UK variant needs to be considered - seems to be far more transmittable
Agreed. The appearance and spread of the Kent variant caught everyone out a bit and certainly impact that graph, although the Christmas plans were optimistic regardless
They knew about the Kent variant in early/mid December and the modelling had been done to show the impact of it by then but the Blonde Bumblecunt delayed changing the Xmas message until the last minute and by that time it was too late. Folk had booked their train tickets and ordered the large turkey, and went ahead with their plans anyway. To compound matters he then decided to have a Gov sponsored super spreader event by getting kids to go back to school for a single day in early January. The more cynical of us would suggest that this was driven more by political motivation, to keep to their commitment to get kids back to school, than it was to prevent the spread of the virus. This was over a month after they knew about the Kent variant. By the end of January the death rate in England (20 per million) was double that in Wales, NI and Scotland. Despite all the new info and experience built up since March and the modelling that clearly demonstrated there would be a significant peak in January the BB still managed to feck it up and preside over a disastrous winter death toll.
tc27
Posts: 2559
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Dogbert wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 11:05 am
tc27 wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:16 am
Insane_Homer wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:14 am Anyone remember how Boris saved Christmas...

Image
Again not defending the bungling of the winter lockdown boggoloo but for context the UK variant needs to be considered - seems to be far more transmittable
Scotland reaps dividend of Covid response that diverged from England’s
Imposing a winter lockdown earlier and prioritising care home vaccinations have kept death rate lower

https://www.ft.com/content/e1eddd2f-cb0 ... 83810fae8d
Cant get through the FT paywall but have read that a few days ago.

Not sure really - difference between England and Scotland less than variation between worst and best English region with same or greater pops - to put it another way if Scotland was recorded as an English region it would be a well performing (2nd best) but not exceptional one. The second point is the new variant (which is thought to have come from a single person) really hammered England in particular. Anyway NI appears to be the best performing UK nation so thats surely the model?

My basic analysis is their is a fag paper between policy in different parts of the UK but that the timing was better for Scotland and NI (earlier in the cycle).

Secondly seems to be repeating the error Devi Shridar et al made in the summer in claiming the virus was eliminated in the summer which was based on ignoring deaths recorded every day by NRS. It clear (and has being admitted) that the SGs epidemiological modelling was significantly underestimated the prevalence of COVID-19 in Scotland over the summer.

Prof Woolhouse had some interesting thoughts on this : https://inews.co.uk/news/scotland/scotl ... ser-887986
Top
User avatar
Calculon
Posts: 1820
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:25 pm

Insane_Homer wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:28 am
tc27 wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:16 am
Insane_Homer wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:14 am Anyone remember how Boris saved Christmas...
Spoiler
Show
Image
Again not defending the bungling of the winter lockdown boggoloo but for context the UK variant needs to be considered - seems to be far more transmittable
The H69/V70 started detectable growth in Aug 2020. Strangely Demark seemed to get it under control in Nov, we didn't.
uk variant.JPG
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... 2.full.pdf
From that article it looks like the so called “UK or Kent” variant independently arose in many different countries, some countries had it before the UK. Which does lead to the question: why did it become the dominant variant in the UK but not the other countries?
Post Reply