Suez canal blocked

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 5058
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

Has anyone tried giving it a good hard flush?

User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6884
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

Did wonder if this was a euphemism...
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12063
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Giant container ship emblazoned with "Evergreen". You couldn't make it up.
Brazil
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2021 8:49 pm

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Wed Mar 24, 2021 8:42 am Giant container ship emblazoned with "Evergreen". You couldn't make it up.
Would you rather it was being flown or carried by truck?
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12063
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Brazil wrote: Wed Mar 24, 2021 8:47 am
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Wed Mar 24, 2021 8:42 am Giant container ship emblazoned with "Evergreen". You couldn't make it up.
Would you rather it was being flown or carried by truck?
:lol: You know, when I posted it I thought "if Braz were here, he'd be over this like a rash".

I'd prefer unnecessary stuff not to be transported at all e.g. asparagus from Peru and refugees from Iran. You know, better than anyone here, that that comment is overly simplistic. Using a weight per distance is always going to result in being more efficient than planes (see end of budget flying thread) or truck........ but maybe not rail. Maybe passenger per miles per rate of speed would make the space shuttle the safest form of travel?

It doesn't alter the fact that the size of global shipping means the aggregate pollution is huge. And planes & trucks don't result in other pollutions e.g. marine sound, bilge........

So, I think the point is fair. Whether shipping is less polluting than other methods just makes it potentially a lesser of evils but does not make it green!

BTW Hi and hope you and the boss and tribe are all well.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5529
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Image

“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
troglodiet
Posts: 401
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:12 pm
Location: South Africa

The person who steered that ship had one job to do - parallel park it.

I bet she's feeling bad about the incident.
User avatar
Lobby
Posts: 1880
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2020 7:34 pm

Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

Glibtor wrote: Wed Mar 24, 2021 4:00 pm The person who steered that ship had one job to do - parallel park it.

I bet she's feeling bad about the incident.
Ow!

:lolno:
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6884
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

dkm57
Posts: 657
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:08 pm

Someone call Dynorod
User avatar
Niegs
Posts: 3743
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 3:20 pm

Too bad they didn't have this plucky chap to save the day!
Image
User avatar
mat the expat
Posts: 1571
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:12 pm

I Lol'd

Image
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12063
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Layman's questions

1) Why no ground base winching? Bring in, anchor them and pull?
2) Skycrane the load off to lighten the ship? Or are freight containers too heavy for that?
User avatar
Kawazaki
Posts: 5281
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:25 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 2:25 pm Layman's questions

1) Why no ground base winching? Bring in, anchor them and pull?
2) Skycrane the load off to lighten the ship? Or are freight containers too heavy for that?



I guess they'd need a very well dug in anchor to winch off 200,000 tonnes - even using a series of pulleys. And that's assuming they could pull from an angle that would work. Surely it can't just be that bulbous nose that's causing the problem though, it must be beached under the beam as well isn't it?
User avatar
laurent
Posts: 2297
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:36 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 2:25 pm Layman's questions

1) Why no ground base winching? Bring in, anchor them and pull?
2) Skycrane the load off to lighten the ship? Or are freight containers too heavy for that?
The Bulge of the Boat is dug in on the side
Image
User avatar
ScarfaceClaw
Posts: 2824
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm

laurent wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 2:56 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 2:25 pm Layman's questions

1) Why no ground base winching? Bring in, anchor them and pull?
2) Skycrane the load off to lighten the ship? Or are freight containers too heavy for that?
The Bulge of the Boat is dug in on the side
Image
What a plucky little digger that one is.
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 5058
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 2:25 pm Layman's questions

1) Why no ground base winching? Bring in, anchor them and pull?
2) Skycrane the load off to lighten the ship? Or are freight containers too heavy for that?
Ships are not designed for those kind of stresses. Good chance it'll rupture of you try to haul it like that.

The thing is the same length as the empire state building. Would take too long to get the load off but they might have to do it if the wee digger can't do the job.
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6884
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

Glibtor wrote: Wed Mar 24, 2021 4:00 pm The person who steered that ship had one job to do - parallel park it.

I bet she's feeling bad about the incident.
Do we know if the ship slewing was due to some sort of mechanical malfunction, or simple human fuck up?
User avatar
laurent
Posts: 2297
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:36 am

tabascoboy wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 9:05 pm
Glibtor wrote: Wed Mar 24, 2021 4:00 pm The person who steered that ship had one job to do - parallel park it.

I bet she's feeling bad about the incident.
Do we know if the ship slewing was due to some sort of mechanical malfunction, or simple human fuck up?
Apparently High Wind
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

Can they not just drop a load of laxative in the canal? Should sort it out in 12 hours
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8866
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

laurent wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 9:23 pm
tabascoboy wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 9:05 pm
Glibtor wrote: Wed Mar 24, 2021 4:00 pm The person who steered that ship had one job to do - parallel park it.

I bet she's feeling bad about the incident.
Do we know if the ship slewing was due to some sort of mechanical malfunction, or simple human fuck up?
Apparently High Wind
Saint wrote: Can they not just drop a load of laxative in the canal? Should sort it out in 12 hours
With that combination, there'd better not be any exposed flames in the area.
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

laurent wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 9:23 pm
tabascoboy wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 9:05 pm
Glibtor wrote: Wed Mar 24, 2021 4:00 pm The person who steered that ship had one job to do - parallel park it.

I bet she's feeling bad about the incident.
Do we know if the ship slewing was due to some sort of mechanical malfunction, or simple human fuck up?
Apparently High Wind
And limited visibility.

I'm not sure her parallel parking abilities are entirely to blame.

(emphasis to point out Glibtor's subtle sexist joke, which may have been missed by some)
shaggy
Posts: 458
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:11 am

Uncle fester wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 9:03 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 2:25 pm Layman's questions

1) Why no ground base winching? Bring in, anchor them and pull?
2) Skycrane the load off to lighten the ship? Or are freight containers too heavy for that?
Ships are not designed for those kind of stresses. Good chance it'll rupture of you try to haul it like that.

The thing is the same length as the empire state building. Would take too long to get the load off but they might have to do it if the wee digger can't do the job.
The issue is the required foundations for any land based winch system, just not possible in short term and sourcing those winches would be tricky.

The vessel will have adequate strength for towing off, I don’t see any structural concerns even if the bow is no longer water tight.

Basically, more tugs are needed once the bow section is cleared but it is likely aground too so they will be looking at how to lighten the load.

Salvage companies will be making a killing.
User avatar
TB63
Posts: 4346
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:11 pm
Location: Tinopolis

They're going to try on Monday as it's a spring tide, all, of 2 metres of it... Be 8.4 metres for us locally...
I love watching little children running and screaming, playing hide and seek in the playground.
They don't know I'm using blanks..
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6884
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

Pfft, they need to use the American way: just bomb the shit out of it.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12063
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Do wonder if this will result in a size restriction henceforth.

I assume boats of that size don't have bow thrusters?
shaggy
Posts: 458
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:11 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 9:10 am Do wonder if this will result in a size restriction henceforth.

I assume boats of that size don't have bow thrusters?
Pictures show 2 bow thrusters.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12063
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

shaggy wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 9:18 am
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 9:10 am Do wonder if this will result in a size restriction henceforth.

I assume boats of that size don't have bow thrusters?
Pictures show 2 bow thrusters.
Where? No matter, will take your word for it.

In which case, makes we question just WTF the pilot was doing.
GogLais
Posts: 2472
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 7:06 pm
Location: Wirral/Cilgwri

tabascoboy wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 9:08 am Pfft, they need to use the American way: just bomb the shit out of it.
Who remembers Torrey Canyon then?
Rhubarb & Custard
Posts: 2443
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm

Uncle fester wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 9:03 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 2:25 pm Layman's questions

1) Why no ground base winching? Bring in, anchor them and pull?
2) Skycrane the load off to lighten the ship? Or are freight containers too heavy for that?
Ships are not designed for those kind of stresses. Good chance it'll rupture of you try to haul it like that.

The thing is the same length as the empire state building. Would take too long to get the load off but they might have to do it if the wee digger can't do the job.
It might not take too long to lighten the load if they've got the right equipment, but the right equipment could easily be in another part of the world and just getting it there could be the slow part.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7414
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

GogLais wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 9:24 am
tabascoboy wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 9:08 am Pfft, they need to use the American way: just bomb the shit out of it.
Who remembers Torrey Canyon then?
Yep :thumbup:
Kabooooom!!!
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12063
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

GogLais wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 9:24 am
tabascoboy wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 9:08 am Pfft, they need to use the American way: just bomb the shit out of it.
Who remembers Torrey Canyon then?
Child's play cw with Exxon Valdez :thumbdown:
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6884
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

GogLais wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 9:24 am
tabascoboy wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 9:08 am Pfft, they need to use the American way: just bomb the shit out of it.
Who remembers Torrey Canyon then?
Bomb first, unforeseen consequences later - it's the manly way.
shaggy
Posts: 458
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:11 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 9:23 am
shaggy wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 9:18 am
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 9:10 am Do wonder if this will result in a size restriction henceforth.

I assume boats of that size don't have bow thrusters?
Pictures show 2 bow thrusters.
Where? No matter, will take your word for it.

In which case, makes we question just WTF the pilot was doing.
Actually, poor picture and the hull markings are not clear so it might be just the one bow tunnel thruster and the bulbous bow.
dkm57
Posts: 657
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:08 pm

A main route canal blocked, need some serious dentistry for this one.
shaggy
Posts: 458
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:11 am

shaggy wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 10:09 am
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 9:23 am
shaggy wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 9:18 am

Pictures show 2 bow thrusters.
Where? No matter, will take your word for it.

In which case, makes we question just WTF the pilot was doing.
Actually, poor picture and the hull markings are not clear so it might be just the one bow tunnel thruster and the bulbous bow.
Also, the Pilot will take no accountability whatsoever, the Master is still in charge of the vessel and its safe navigation. He/she might be looking for new employment once it is anchored off Port Said and surveyors attend.
User avatar
Blake
Posts: 2682
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:28 pm
Location: Republic of Western Cape

Creating a shit ton of maritime traffic around Saffer land...as would be expected.
Suez.png
Suez.png (519.08 KiB) Viewed 1741 times
User avatar
vball
Posts: 341
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:36 am
Location: The Highlands of Scotland

What would the difference be in journey time from say Gibraltar to Mumbai going around the Cape compared to going via Suez?
I just wondered when the ships started using that route.
Romans said ....Illegitimi non carborundum --- Today we say .. WTF
User avatar
Kawazaki
Posts: 5281
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:25 am

Can anyone in the know explain how tugs work? Do they just have more/bigger blades on their propeller(s) attached to a bigger engine(s) or is there more science and engineering in play?
Post Reply