So, coronavirus...

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 10127
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Yeah, he explicitly states his assumptions in the tweet. It's not direct evidence for the efficacy of masks.
User avatar
Enzedder
Posts: 4010
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:55 pm
Location: Hamilton NZ

Well this is good - I reckon it's the type of bastard thing waiting to line me up
💥DELTACRON:
A scientist in Cyprus recently reported a variant in 25 patients that looked like a genetic combination of both Omicron and Delta. While it is possible for different variants to “recombine,” scientists looking at the data believe that this is a case of contamination in the lab where the sequencing took place. Evaluation is on-going, but while “deltacron” sounds like another cool transformer name it is likely NOT something you need to worry about (yet 😉)
https://qz.com/.../deltacron-variant-is ... -a-lab.../
I drink and I forget things.
User avatar
laurent
Posts: 2276
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:36 am

Enzedder wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 9:59 pm Well this is good - I reckon it's the type of bastard thing waiting to line me up
💥DELTACRON:
A scientist in Cyprus recently reported a variant in 25 patients that looked like a genetic combination of both Omicron and Delta. While it is possible for different variants to “recombine,” scientists looking at the data believe that this is a case of contamination in the lab where the sequencing took place. Evaluation is on-going, but while “deltacron” sounds like another cool transformer name it is likely NOT something you need to worry about (yet 😉)
https://qz.com/.../deltacron-variant-is ... -a-lab.../
Thankfully most likely a lab error
User avatar
Calculon
Posts: 1820
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:25 pm

Is the focus on modelling a uniquely UK thing? Haven't noticed it to nowhere near the same level in any other country.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how ... -an-update
Biffer
Posts: 10016
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Calculon wrote: Sun Jan 16, 2022 11:53 am Is the focus on modelling a uniquely UK thing? Haven't noticed it to nowhere near the same level in any other country.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how ... -an-update
There aren't that many countries in the world that have the academic base around epidemic modelling that we have. So it's proba ly more prominent here than in most places.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
Enzedder
Posts: 4010
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:55 pm
Location: Hamilton NZ

Aren't those scenarios based on what could happen if no action is taken?
I drink and I forget things.
dpedin
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

Modelling isn't about predictions, it all depends on what assumptions you make and model, usually based on what is known at the time. So if a new variant comes along and you don't know much about it then you might base modelling assumptions on what you know of existing/previous variants and if then if more info becomes available then you change your assumptions accordingly. Models all say 'here are the assumptions on which this model is based' and usually they can be refined, changed and adapted as more info comes to light. Trying to diminish the role of modelling because folk think they are wrong is just plain stupid and I wouldn't expect anything less from the Spectator to be honest.

As said above the UK has a very strong history in epidemiology, public health medicine and in associated modelling capability, let's celebrate it and not diminish it because a few right wing populists don't understand it and don't like it for political reasons..
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

What’s the opinion on SAGE?
petej
Posts: 2506
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:41 am
Location: Gwent

Calculon wrote: Sun Jan 16, 2022 11:53 am Is the focus on modelling a uniquely UK thing? Haven't noticed it to nowhere near the same level in any other country.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how ... -an-update
they've been prominent in influencing UK policy. Essentially, because Johnson is such a moron they have had to consistently use worse case scenarios to get him to act. With a competent leader they wouldn't have been so noticeable. Spectator has zero integrity and a lot of the time forgets to note a change of policy on a model that assumes no change in policy.
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

Ymx wrote: Sun Jan 16, 2022 6:04 pm What’s the opinion on SAGE?
Doh. I should have opened Calculons link. :oops:
Biffer
Posts: 10016
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Ymx wrote: Sun Jan 16, 2022 6:04 pm What’s the opinion on SAGE?
All very good scientists but I'm not certain that all the individual Sage panels (there are multiple Sage groups) have a broad enough range of opinion to fully reflect that genuine range of scientific opinion in that area. Not saying every opinion needs represented, but I think some panels may have a certain level of groupthink.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

Speaking of stats.

Here is the UK deaths daily with covid looking worrying.

Image

Spoiler
Show

And here is the UK deaths daily from covid

Image
Wrinkles
Posts: 351
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2021 6:01 pm

Ymx wrote: Sun Jan 16, 2022 8:54 pm Speaking of stats.

Here is the UK deaths daily with covid looking worrying.

Image

Spoiler
Show

And here is the UK deaths daily from covid

Image
Not sure why that’s worrying. Given 1:15 are estimated to have Covid, deaths are barely above the average infection level. SAGE predicted between 600 and 6,000 deaths a day at this stage, but even the BBC are now talking down the numbers - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-60000391
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

Wrinkles wrote: Sun Jan 16, 2022 9:12 pm
Ymx wrote: Sun Jan 16, 2022 8:54 pm Speaking of stats.

Here is the UK deaths daily with covid looking worrying.

Image

Spoiler
Show

And here is the UK deaths daily from covid

Image
Not sure why that’s worrying. Given 1:15 are estimated to have Covid, deaths are barely above the average infection level. SAGE predicted between 600 and 6,000 deaths a day at this stage, but even the BBC are now talking down the numbers - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-60000391
Did you click my spoiler? Was making a point of the reality of it vs published.
Biffer
Posts: 10016
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

dpedin wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:34 pm
Biffer wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 2:38 pm
dpedin wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 2:00 pm

We don't have 20,000 deaths due to flu. These are the numbers for deaths from flu and pneumonia - they are coded together in the death stats. Flu deaths are actually a lot smaller. Pneumonia can be caused by flu, lots will be but there are lots of other reasons why folk get pneumonia and die from it. See https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transpar ... 019and2020
Yeah, but that’s where the three hundred deaths a day figure comes from, flu and pneumonia.
Yeh but the 20k+ deaths are for both flu and pneumonia and pneumonia can be caused by a range of viral, bacterial and fungal infections. There will be a number of medical conditions for which patients will go on to develop pneumonia and possibly die from it.

The notes to the data also say that the numbers are for where flu and pneumonia were mentioned anywhere on the death certificate and not just the underlying cause of death. This will inflate the numbers - many of the number will include patients who died with pneumonia not because of it.

The true figure of death due to influenza in 2019 is probably somewhere between the 1,223 who were coded as for dying with flu and the 26,342 who died from either flu and pneumonia.
This is an interesting analysis

https://t.co/ewlOoqAHav
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Wrinkles
Posts: 351
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2021 6:01 pm

Ymx wrote: Sun Jan 16, 2022 9:32 pm
Wrinkles wrote: Sun Jan 16, 2022 9:12 pm
Ymx wrote: Sun Jan 16, 2022 8:54 pm Speaking of stats.

Here is the UK deaths daily with covid looking worrying.

Image

Spoiler
Show

And here is the UK deaths daily from covid

Image
Not sure why that’s worrying. Given 1:15 are estimated to have Covid, deaths are barely above the average infection level. SAGE predicted between 600 and 6,000 deaths a day at this stage, but even the BBC are now talking down the numbers - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-60000391
Did you click my spoiler? Was making a point of the reality of it vs published.
Bugger. No, I hadn’t noticed it! As you were.
Last edited by Wrinkles on Mon Jan 17, 2022 7:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

😂😂👍
User avatar
C69
Posts: 3412
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:42 pm

Well with regards to vaccines and work in the NHS, I recieved a list of all the staff in my dept that I have to discuss Vaccine as a Condition of Deployment (VCOD).
Give all the staff are patient facing and the opportunities of non patient facing activities are scarce/non existent then this is going to be challenging to say the least.

I suspect the shit is about to hot the fan actoss the NHS. I for one am not looking forward to having these discussions and will ensure I have a box of tears for the staff and a flack jacket and armour for me.
petej
Posts: 2506
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:41 am
Location: Gwent

C69 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 9:39 am Well with regards to vaccines and work in the NHS, I recieved a list of all the staff in my dept that I have to discuss Vaccine as a Condition of Deployment (VCOD).
Give all the staff are patient facing and the opportunities of non patient facing activities are scarce/non existent then this is going to be challenging to say the least.

I suspect the shit is about to hot the fan actoss the NHS. I for one am not looking forward to having these discussions and will ensure I have a box of tears for the staff and a flack jacket and armour for me.
I would be surprised if any one who works in a hospital hasn't been exposed to COVID. Considering where we are isn't this is increasingly pointless? Some point soon ie in the next 6 months we are going to give up on the isolation and separation of COVID patients.
tc27
Posts: 2559
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/

Case numbers imply we are well past the peak of this wave.

It also looks like deaths and hospital admissions are starting to follow cases albeit with the usual lag.
petej
Posts: 2506
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:41 am
Location: Gwent

tc27 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 9:58 am https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/

Case numbers imply we are well past the peak of this wave.

It also looks like deaths and hospital admissions are starting to follow cases albeit with the usual lag.
Not sure deaths even went up at all. Perhaps because Omicron displaced delta (and booster role out +increased immunity) deaths actually fell. There is a downward trend since the beginning November.
Screenshot_20220117-101459.png
Screenshot_20220117-101459.png (259.94 KiB) Viewed 1215 times
dpedin
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

tc27 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 9:58 am https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/

Case numbers imply we are well past the peak of this wave.

It also looks like deaths and hospital admissions are starting to follow cases albeit with the usual lag.
Hopefully this is the end of this wave. This is the third/fourth wave of cases and deaths we have had with covid and although the number of cases has been high the number of deaths with this wave has been greatly reduced thanks to the vaccination programme. It seems to be the unvaccinated who are disproportionately dying with omicron. Will this be the last wave of cases and will another variant emerge, we don't know yet. From what I have been told there is likely to be another wave of omicron later in the spring so this is a good time to really push the vaccination programme amongst those reluctant to have it and within the younger age groups. This would save guard us against future variants which hopefully the vaccines will still protect us against. Hopefully first world countries will also now push the vaccination programme world wide and protect us by protecting the world poorest from this virus.
dpedin
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

petej wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:18 am
tc27 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 9:58 am https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/

Case numbers imply we are well past the peak of this wave.

It also looks like deaths and hospital admissions are starting to follow cases albeit with the usual lag.
Not sure deaths even went up at all. Perhaps because Omicron displaced delta (and booster role out +increased immunity) deaths actually fell. There is a downward trend since the beginning November.
Screenshot_20220117-101459.png
Excess deaths in UK have been higher than 5 year average pre pandemic since end of July 2021. Whilst I understand the debate about underlying cause/cause of death data the reality is that the covid pandemic has directly resulted in more folk dying, about c1,500 folk per week on average (guesstimate from eyeballing data) since July 2021. One small glimmer of hope is that the excess deaths number is getting smaller.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 10127
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

petej wrote: Sun Jan 16, 2022 6:11 pm
Calculon wrote: Sun Jan 16, 2022 11:53 am Is the focus on modelling a uniquely UK thing? Haven't noticed it to nowhere near the same level in any other country.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how ... -an-update
they've been prominent in influencing UK policy. Essentially, because Johnson is such a moron they have had to consistently use worse case scenarios to get him to act. With a competent leader they wouldn't have been so noticeable. Spectator has zero integrity and a lot of the time forgets to note a change of policy on a model that assumes no change in policy.
Yeah, it cannot be stated strongly enough that the Spectator has form for this - they are not an unbiased source. As I mentioned here: http://notplanetrugby.com/viewtopic.php ... 45#p164679 their attempt at a 'dashboard' tracking reality vs SAGE was deeply disingenuous

User avatar
mat the expat
Posts: 1552
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:12 pm

C69 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 9:39 am Well with regards to vaccines and work in the NHS, I recieved a list of all the staff in my dept that I have to discuss Vaccine as a Condition of Deployment (VCOD).
Give all the staff are patient facing and the opportunities of non patient facing activities are scarce/non existent then this is going to be challenging to say the least.

I suspect the shit is about to hot the fan actoss the NHS. I for one am not looking forward to having these discussions and will ensure I have a box of tears for the staff and a flack jacket and armour for me.
We have to supply proof of vaccination to our workplaces here to be allowed in the building.

Don't have a problem with it
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 10127
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Christ, just chatting to a mate and he tells me his youngest daughter caught Covid 6 weeks ago and has tested positive again today...
Biffer
Posts: 10016
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Cases really tumbled in the last week in Scotland. Less than 3,000 positive PCR tests reported today, compared to 17,000 a fortnight ago.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
Marylandolorian
Posts: 1328
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 2:47 pm
Location: Amerikanuak

JM2K6 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:47 pm Christ, just chatting to a mate and he tells me his youngest daughter caught Covid 6 weeks ago and has tested positive again today...
If it was a PCR test , it can remain positive for up to 12 weeks after infection, CDC recommends antigens test instead.
User avatar
Mahoney
Posts: 640
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

petej wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:18 am
tc27 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 9:58 am https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/

Case numbers imply we are well past the peak of this wave.

It also looks like deaths and hospital admissions are starting to follow cases albeit with the usual lag.
Not sure deaths even went up at all. Perhaps because Omicron displaced delta (and booster role out +increased immunity) deaths actually fell. There is a downward trend since the beginning November.
Screenshot_20220117-101459.png
Don't think you can make that call yet - the data on deaths with COVID-19 on the death certificate is only robust up to 20th December and only even present up to 31st December. Deaths within 28 days of positive test only began to rise on 26th December. So there's every chance it just hasn't filtered through yet. Until this wave deaths with COVID-19 on the death certificate have generally been marginally higher for the same date than deaths within 28 days of positive test.
Wha daur meddle wi' me?
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 10127
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Marylandolorian wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:32 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:47 pm Christ, just chatting to a mate and he tells me his youngest daughter caught Covid 6 weeks ago and has tested positive again today...
If it was a PCR test , it can remain positive for up to 12 weeks after infection, CDC recommends antigens test instead.
Tested negative repeatedly in-between. Looks like a genuine re-infection (presumably Delta then Omicron)
Slick
Posts: 13226
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Biffer wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:25 pm Cases really tumbled in the last week in Scotland. Less than 3,000 positive PCR tests reported today, compared to 17,000 a fortnight ago.
That's very good. Although, I think a lot of people are not bothering with PCR tests/ Can't get one etc. Not nearly enough to discount those figures mind.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Biffer
Posts: 10016
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Slick wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:47 pm
Biffer wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:25 pm Cases really tumbled in the last week in Scotland. Less than 3,000 positive PCR tests reported today, compared to 17,000 a fortnight ago.
That's very good. Although, I think a lot of people are not bothering with PCR tests/ Can't get one etc. Not nearly enough to discount those figures mind.
They're much easier to get than they were a fortnight ago tbh. Think it's back to them being available in the next hour in Edinburgh. Scottish government now also reporting on lateral flow tests, which they hadn't been doing previously. Hospital bed occupation seems to have levelled off and ICU numbers have fallen back (qlthough they didn't go up that much)
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
petej
Posts: 2506
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:41 am
Location: Gwent

Slick wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:47 pm
Biffer wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:25 pm Cases really tumbled in the last week in Scotland. Less than 3,000 positive PCR tests reported today, compared to 17,000 a fortnight ago.
That's very good. Although, I think a lot of people are not bothering with PCR tests/ Can't get one etc. Not nearly enough to discount those figures mind.
But when the positivity is also heading downwards you definitely can't discount them. I do find the map funny today. Perhaps Devon and Cornwall should join Wales.
Screenshot_20220117-164216.png
Screenshot_20220117-164216.png (299.19 KiB) Viewed 1020 times
shaggy
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:11 am

petej wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 4:45 pm
Slick wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:47 pm
Biffer wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:25 pm Cases really tumbled in the last week in Scotland. Less than 3,000 positive PCR tests reported today, compared to 17,000 a fortnight ago.
That's very good. Although, I think a lot of people are not bothering with PCR tests/ Can't get one etc. Not nearly enough to discount those figures mind.
But when the positivity is also heading downwards you definitely can't discount them. I do find the map funny today. Perhaps Devon and Cornwall should join Wales.
Screenshot_20220117-164216.png
Fuck off. You can have Cornwall as they are weird buggers but Devon stays in England!
dpedin
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

petej wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 4:45 pm
Slick wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:47 pm
Biffer wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:25 pm Cases really tumbled in the last week in Scotland. Less than 3,000 positive PCR tests reported today, compared to 17,000 a fortnight ago.
That's very good. Although, I think a lot of people are not bothering with PCR tests/ Can't get one etc. Not nearly enough to discount those figures mind.
But when the positivity is also heading downwards you definitely can't discount them. I do find the map funny today. Perhaps Devon and Cornwall should join Wales.
Screenshot_20220117-164216.png
Scotland reported on 16,208 new tests yesterday of which 21.3% were positive the highest rate since last Tuesday. Yesterday 27,243 tests were reported so a drop in test reported by 45%. 7 day average for positive reports was 19.4%. You have to go back over a year to find as low a number of tests reported. To me, unless this is a reporting hiccup which is a distinct possibility, it looks like there is a significant drop off in tests, and therefore cases, being reported which can't be explained completely by a drop in actual covid cases. I suspect most folk are not bothering to report on LFTs or even getting tested now? The impact of this is that number of cases is now a different measure - we are not comparing like with like now so any trend info is not worth looking at. Hospitalisations and deaths remain the key indicators.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7296
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

shaggy wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 5:02 pm
petej wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 4:45 pm
Slick wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:47 pm

That's very good. Although, I think a lot of people are not bothering with PCR tests/ Can't get one etc. Not nearly enough to discount those figures mind.
But when the positivity is also heading downwards you definitely can't discount them. I do find the map funny today. Perhaps Devon and Cornwall should join Wales.
Screenshot_20220117-164216.png
Fuck off. You can have Cornwall as they are weird buggers but Devon stays in England!
Aren't most of them second home owners from Notting Hill and Islington?
shaggy
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:11 am

SaintK wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 5:31 pm
shaggy wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 5:02 pm
petej wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 4:45 pm
But when the positivity is also heading downwards you definitely can't discount them. I do find the map funny today. Perhaps Devon and Cornwall should join Wales.
Screenshot_20220117-164216.png
Fuck off. You can have Cornwall as they are weird buggers but Devon stays in England!
Aren't most of them second home owners from Notting Hill and Islington?
Devon is not much different, locals are priced out by Home Counties dwellers dropping 7 figure sums on properties. No, the Cornish are proper weird.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8729
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

SaintK wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 5:31 pm
shaggy wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 5:02 pm
petej wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 4:45 pm
But when the positivity is also heading downwards you definitely can't discount them. I do find the map funny today. Perhaps Devon and Cornwall should join Wales.
Screenshot_20220117-164216.png
Fuck off. You can have Cornwall as they are weird buggers but Devon stays in England!
Aren't most of them second home owners from Notting Hill and Islington?
and Rick Stein owns the rest...
User avatar
CM11
Posts: 981
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:24 am

Going to be very odd being able to have a normal conversation about covid on here!

Anyway, read this initially as a young child and was wondering about repeated tests but am I right to assume the reason for that was that she works in healthcare or some area with high exposure?
JM2K6 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:58 pm
Marylandolorian wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:32 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:47 pm Christ, just chatting to a mate and he tells me his youngest daughter caught Covid 6 weeks ago and has tested positive again today...
If it was a PCR test , it can remain positive for up to 12 weeks after infection, CDC recommends antigens test instead.
Tested negative repeatedly in-between. Looks like a genuine re-infection (presumably Delta then Omicron)
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

Makes sense.

6 weeks ago was 6th Dec.

Image

So I guess 6 weeks ago it was 95% likely delta, and now it’s probably 99.9% likely omicron.
Post Reply